Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo

Top 10 DX Unified Infrastructure Management Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
4.1 out of 5
3,648 followers
Start review

Top DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to DX Unified Infrastructure Management based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

DX Unified Infrastructure Management surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive monitoring, rapid issue detection, and seamless integration, ensuring optimal performance and reliability for IT environments by leveraging cutting-edge analytics and a user-friendly interface.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace provides efficient support and competitive pricing, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels in feature sets for those willing to invest. In comparison, Dynatrace offers AI-driven analytics and automated problem resolution. DX Unified Infrastructure Management is noted for extensive integration and customizable alerts.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Dynatrace Report
Dynatrace setup cost is reportedly high, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is noted for lower initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace setup cost is reportedly high, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management is noted for lower initial setup expenses.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
DX UIM offers network visibility and supports multi-tenancy, making it ideal for complex infrastructures. In comparison, Datadog's strength is in seamless cloud integration with real-time analytics, appealing to those needing simple, in-depth data insights.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Datadog Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers setup cost details that emphasize initial affordability, while Datadog's setup cost reviews suggest a simple yet potentially higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers setup cost details that emphasize initial affordability, while Datadog's setup cost reviews suggest a simple yet potentially higher initial investment.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels in comprehensive monitoring and integration, providing ease of use and detailed reporting. In comparison, Zabbix offers superior scalability, flexibility, and customization. DX Unified Infrastructure Management's straightforward deployment and robust customer service contrast with Zabbix's requirement for significant expertise and better out-of-the-box functionalities.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Zabbix Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has higher initial setup costs, while Zabbix offers a lower-cost setup option, distinguishing the two in pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has higher initial setup costs, while Zabbix offers a lower-cost setup option, distinguishing the two in pricing.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in areas like OS deployment but could enhance remote control features. In comparison, DX Unified Infrastructure Management supports extensive customization, though users note scalability issues. A tech buyer might choose Configuration Manager for integrations, while DX offers flexible deployment.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers a setup cost that may be lower, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management might have higher initial costs reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers a setup cost that may be lower, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management might have higher initial costs reflecting its advanced features.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers scalability and extensive monitoring, suitable for large enterprises. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for smaller environments with its intuitive setup and cost-effectiveness. DX UIM targets complex needs, while PRTG provides ease and affordability for straightforward monitoring.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management requires a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management requires a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective alternative.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ideal for scalable, stable environments with its versatile probes and robust technology. In comparison, ThousandEyes excels in network-centric monitoring and cloud visibility, making it appealing for businesses needing detailed network path analysis and end-user monitoring.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ThousandEyes Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a complex setup cost structure, while ThousandEyes offers a straightforward, all-inclusive fee, highlighting the difference in initial investment considerations between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a complex setup cost structure, while ThousandEyes offers a straightforward, all-inclusive fee, highlighting the difference in initial investment considerations between the two solutions.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
DX UIM offers comprehensive scalability and flexibility, making it suitable for heterogeneous environments. In comparison, CSNA excels in network visibility and threat detection within the Cisco ecosystem, appealing to enterprises prioritizing seamless security integration.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has lower setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Network Analytics, which entails higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has lower setup costs compared to Cisco Secure Network Analytics, which entails higher initial expenses.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI is known for a clear pricing model and excellent customer support, making it a straightforward choice for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels in feature set and user satisfaction, offering advanced capabilities worth the higher initial investment.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Nagios XI Report
Nagios XI's setup cost is often high, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management tends to offer more affordable initial setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI's setup cost is often high, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management tends to offer more affordable initial setup options.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM excels in monitoring Microsoft environments with strong integration and management packs. In comparison, DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers flexibility for heterogeneous systems, supporting multiple platforms, but both need improvements in cross-platform support and scalability to address varying organizational needs.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. SCOM Report
SCOM has a comparatively higher setup cost, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers a more budget-friendly option. The pricing variance highlights SCOM's focus on enterprise-level features, contrasting DX's approach towards accessibility and affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM has a comparatively higher setup cost, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers a more budget-friendly option. The pricing variance highlights SCOM's focus on enterprise-level features, contrasting DX's approach towards accessibility and affordability.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers extensive monitoring and reporting capabilities, providing insights into various infrastructure aspects. In comparison, Checkmk excels with robust monitoring, customizable checks, and dashboards. DX Unified Infrastructure Management has complex setup, while Checkmk provides cost-effective, straightforward deployment with responsive customer service.
Download Checkmk vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost, while Checkmk offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost, while Checkmk offers a more affordable initial setup.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is known for its extensive scope and automation options, while LogicMonitor offers advanced anomaly detection and in-depth insights. In comparison, LogicMonitor is easier to deploy and offers better pricing structures and faster ROI, making it a cost-effective solution.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. LogicMonitor Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to LogicMonitor. LogicMonitor offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to LogicMonitor. LogicMonitor offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers extensive scalability and monitoring customization supporting multi-tenancy. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time analytics and integrates well with third-party tools. Splunk's strengths lie in its robust dashboards and alert systems, appealing to enterprises favoring real-time monitoring.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management incurs moderate setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud is characterized by higher initial expenses. These differences highlight significant cost variations between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management incurs moderate setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud is characterized by higher initial expenses. These differences highlight significant cost variations between the two solutions.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers advanced monitoring and scalability for enterprises, ideal for those needing comprehensive support across multiple platforms. In comparison, Nagios Core provides cost-effective flexibility and simplicity, appealing to those with in-house expertise seeking open-source solutions.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Nagios Core Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Nagios Core, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This reflects DX’s broader feature set versus Nagios Core’s focus on essential monitoring functions.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management generally incurs a higher setup cost compared to Nagios Core, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup. This reflects DX’s broader feature set versus Nagios Core’s focus on essential monitoring functions.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers extensive scalability with various monitoring probes, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Centreon provides customizable monitoring with open-source benefits, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. A tech buyer may prefer DX for scalability or Centreon for affordability.
Download Centreon vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to Centreon, highlighting a significant initial financial commitment difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to Centreon, highlighting a significant initial financial commitment difference between the two solutions.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels in automation with its extensive integration range, real-time monitoring, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers superior scalability, robust analytics, and enhanced configurability. Tech buyers might choose ScienceLogic for exceptional support or DX Unified Infrastructure Management for advanced capabilities.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has lower setup costs compared to DX Unified Infrastructure Management, which tends to be more complex and expensive to implement.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has lower setup costs compared to DX Unified Infrastructure Management, which tends to be more complex and expensive to implement.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels in comprehensive functionality and proactive issue resolution. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is known for its simplicity and detailed performance insights. DX offers broader functionality, whereas SolarWinds provides ease of deployment and advanced features at a higher cost.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management setup cost is often noted as higher due to its comprehensive capabilities, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is seen as more cost-effective yet provides robust functionality for monitoring applications.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management setup cost is often noted as higher due to its comprehensive capabilities, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is seen as more cost-effective yet provides robust functionality for monitoring applications.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management offers predictive analytics and comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides broad infrastructure coverage and detailed reporting tools. BMC focuses on enhancing functionalities, whereas DX aims to improve scalability. BMC is noted for cost-effectiveness, while DX is valued for robust features.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher setup cost compared to DX Unified Infrastructure Management, making DX a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher setup cost compared to DX Unified Infrastructure Management, making DX a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
DX UIM offers broad scalability with a comprehensive probe library for detailed infrastructure monitoring, attractive for its modular design. In comparison, Google Cloud operations suite excels in cloud-centric capabilities, delivering strong analytics and visibility for effectively managing cloud resources.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite is known for a more economical initial setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite is known for a more economical initial setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers cost-efficient, all-in-one monitoring and easier deployment. In comparison, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management delivers advanced analytics and scalability, justifying higher setup costs. DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels in support, while IBM SevOne NPM needs simpler configuration.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a high setup cost compared to the relatively low setup cost of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM). DX offers more comprehensive features, while IBM SevOne focuses on affordability and efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a high setup cost compared to the relatively low setup cost of IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM). DX offers more comprehensive features, while IBM SevOne focuses on affordability and efficiency.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5

DX Unified Infrastructure Management provides extensive scalability and diverse probe offerings. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers robust cloud platform support with excellent Kubernetes integration. DX suits large enterprises; VMware appeals to those needing strong cloud consolidation and open-source frameworks.

Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management typically has a higher setup cost, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications is noted for its comparatively lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly option for organizations looking to manage infrastructure effectively.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management typically has a higher setup cost, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications is noted for its comparatively lower setup cost, offering a budget-friendly option for organizations looking to manage infrastructure effectively.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold offers features like real-time performance monitoring and customizable dashboards, appealing to those needing personalized insights. In comparison, DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels in scalability and comprehensive metric coverage. WhatsUp Gold's ease of deployment contrasts with DX's more complex setup and training requirements.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold is known for its lower setup costs, allowing for budget-friendly deployment, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management typically incurs higher initial expenses. These differences highlight the varying investment levels required to begin using each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold is known for its lower setup costs, allowing for budget-friendly deployment, while DX Unified Infrastructure Management typically incurs higher initial expenses. These differences highlight the varying investment levels required to begin using each solution.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers scalability through customizable probes and dashboards. In comparison, ManageEngine OpManager provides essential monitoring with stable pricing. DX UIM excels in deployment versatility, while ManageEngine prioritizes on-premises solutions with consistent support, although DX UIM presents a compelling ROI.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine OpManager, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine OpManager, which offers a more cost-effective initial investment.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers robust infrastructure monitoring, valuable for large IT setups. In comparison, Moogsoft emphasizes AI-driven automation for incident management. Tech buyers might choose DX UIM for monitoring needs or Moogsoft for automation and operational efficiency.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Moogsoft Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers a lower setup cost compared to Moogsoft. Moogsoft, however, provides more advanced features, justifying its higher setup price.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers a lower setup cost compared to Moogsoft. Moogsoft, however, provides more advanced features, justifying its higher setup price.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is favored for its ease of deployment and responsive customer service, offering comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities. In comparison, Opsview excels with its extensive plugins and flexibility, making it ideal for those needing advanced features and customization options.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Opsview Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers competitive setup costs, while Opsview is known for slightly higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers competitive setup costs, while Opsview is known for slightly higher initial expenses.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Ixia Hawkeye
4.6 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Ixia Hawkeye
4.6 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers versatile integrations and comprehensive infrastructure insights, making it user-friendly. In comparison, Ixia Hawkeye’s focused approach delivers detailed diagnostic capabilities ideal for specific network needs, appealing to users seeking targeted monitoring solutions with flexible deployment and specialized customer assistance.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher initial setup cost compared to Ixia Hawkeye, which offers a more budget-friendly setup fee, indicating a distinct difference in cost structures between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher initial setup cost compared to Ixia Hawkeye, which offers a more budget-friendly setup fee, indicating a distinct difference in cost structures between the two solutions.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
NetCrunch
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
NetCrunch
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers extensive monitoring capabilities, integrated analytics, and scalability. In comparison, NetCrunch provides real-time monitoring, sophisticated alerting systems, and detailed visualizations. DX Unified Infrastructure Management's moderate pricing and ROI are attractive, while NetCrunch's superior capabilities justify its higher costs.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. NetCrunch Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has higher setup costs compared to NetCrunch, making the latter more budget-friendly for initial deployment. NetCrunch's lower setup costs position it as a more accessible option.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has higher setup costs compared to NetCrunch, making the latter more budget-friendly for initial deployment. NetCrunch's lower setup costs position it as a more accessible option.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers comprehensive monitoring and advanced analytics for solid infrastructure coverage. In comparison, Loom Systems excels with AI-driven insights and predictive analytics. DX provides strong deployment and support, while Loom ensures easy integration. DX's higher initial costs contrast with Loom's proactive investment returns.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Loom Systems Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a moderate setup cost, while Loom Systems offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a moderate setup cost, while Loom Systems offers a more affordable setup.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Goliath Performance Monitor
3.8 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels with cost-effective pricing and comprehensive support. In comparison, Goliath Performance Monitor delivers superior performance features and efficient deployment, offering significant value despite higher costs. Tech buyers might consider DX for pricing or Goliath for advanced analytics capabilities.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management incurs higher setup costs, while Goliath Performance Monitor offers a more affordable initial setup. This distinction highlights budgetary considerations in choosing between these options.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management incurs higher setup costs, while Goliath Performance Monitor offers a more affordable initial setup. This distinction highlights budgetary considerations in choosing between these options.
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Fortra's Network Server Suite
1 out of 5

Network Server Suite provides comprehensive monitoring and automation for Windows, AIX/VIOS, and Linux servers and SNMP devices. It was designed to deliver smooth operations without increasing headcount by centralizing the monitoring and management of all network servers.

View comparison

Related categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Network Monitoring Software
Server Monitoring