Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

Broadcom and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #75, while ManageEngine is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Broadcom holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.
DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Read 120 DX Unified Infrastructure Management reviews
  • 747 Views
  • 446 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
ManageEngine OpManager
Read 51 ManageEngine OpManager reviews
  • 3,326 Views
  • 2,033 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Unified Infrastructure Management and ManageEngine OpManager compete in the infrastructure management tools category. DX Unified Infrastructure Management appears to have the upper hand for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features and scalability, while ManageEngine OpManager is preferred for its ease of use and cost-effectiveness in network monitoring.

Features: DX Unified Infrastructure Management shines with its scalable architecture, stable non-Java framework, and diverse monitoring probes. It integrates multiple monitoring needs, enabling large enterprises to customize extensively. ManageEngine OpManager focuses on network performance monitoring, provides an intuitive solution for managing network devices, and offers a user-friendly interface.

Room for Improvement: DX Unified Infrastructure Management could improve customer support, integration capabilities, and reporting features. ManageEngine OpManager could enhance its reporting capabilities, dashboard customization, and incorporate advanced features for non-network devices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers flexible deployment across hybrid cloud environments, though customer service has faced challenges post-acquisition by CA. ManageEngine OpManager provides straightforward on-premises deployment and strong customer support but lacks cloud integration flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: DX Unified Infrastructure Management is priced higher, reflecting its comprehensive enterprise capabilities, with ROI seen through automation and monitoring. ManageEngine OpManager offers competitive pricing, beneficial for smaller to mid-sized businesses focusing on network monitoring, requiring consideration of needs versus budget.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Unified Infrastructure M...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
75th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
Server Monitoring (24th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th), Cloud Monitoring Software (41st), AIOps (21st)
ManageEngine OpManager
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Q&A Highlights

SS
Oct 15, 2019
What Is The Biggest Difference Between CA UIM and Manage Engine?
UIM is a very old, expensive, conglomeration of tools all written by different companies. ManageEngine has moderate capabilities but largely developed for smaller companies. If you read their reviews there is a great deal of angst with their support and implementation services. Also, they are all separate products built to be standalone so there is not the integration you would find in a true AIOps platform. They are also far more expensive than our offering. Take a look https://ptdrv.linkedin.com/yajsbk6
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

Arunpandiyan M - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support
There are quite a few manual processes. We've had issues with pulling reports. Sometimes we have trouble or get errors. The reporting process should be easier. If you have a hub, you should be able to have an unlimited number of servers. For example, if you have 500 servers, and the limit is ten, you have to pull 50 reports. We'd like to just pull one report for all servers. This also increases the time to pull reports. If we have to pull more reports, it takes that much longer than just pulling one. The product can be expensive. Right now, they are updating and consolidating the dashboard. I'm expecting an update that will resolve a few glitches in the server.
Read full review
MUBDIUL ISLAM - PeerSpot reviewer
NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations
For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."
"It is the foundation for our monitoring solution."
"We are able to go in and actually leverage the thick client for a nice easy drag and drop solution."
"This solution allows us to have an overview of the infrastructure and identify areas where the performance isn't optimal, or where upgrades could be carried out."
"It provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for our open systems."
"The feature that we've found to be very helpful is the way the solution categorizes the devices to identify groups, groups of devices and clusters. This allows us to be aware of their position within the topology."
"It is very scalable."
"The ability to monitor any platform. We have Windows, Linux, AIX, and mainframe all being monitored with the same UIM infrastructure."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management pros
"The product provides intensive reports."
"The solution is scalable."
"Overall, I give the product a rating of ten."
"I am satisfied with ManageEngine OpManager's monitoring features."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."
"ManageEngine OpManager is user-friendly and easy to use. Additionally, useful for basic monitoring."
"We have found the solution to be stable."
"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."
More ManageEngine OpManager pros
 

Cons

"How we can get more native information from CA's solutions."
"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."
"I think it can be improved by a greater provision of specialized technical support, as there are very few trained personnel there."
"We have experienced challenges with finding a mechanism to deploy the agents, but it's only on the first deployment so it's not a big issue."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."
"The other element is that there are no real templates, out of the box. Let's go with an example where we do have the probe, which is great, and we do have a really nuanced customer with a small set of devices that maybe not a lot of other customers use. There might not be a template in place, so effectively we have the tool in front of us but we still need to develop a solution. So it would be really nice to see a little bit more of something like a central repository of templates that we could use. That would help us expedite our onboarding process."
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management cons
"The licensing model is confusing."
"The solution's reports need to include the number of applications consumed."
"The dashboard has some limitations and should be more user-friendly."
"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view."
"With regard to configurations, however, it would be nice to have more documentation on SNMP configurations. For example, if I want to add a new vendor, it would be great if ManageEngine provided the requirements for that vendor, such as the commands needed."
"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."
"We had some stability issues at the outset that have since been resolved."
"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."
More ManageEngine OpManager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is expensive compared to other vendors (SolarWinds, ManageEngine)."
"CAD $400,000 annually."
"Pricing for DX Unified Infrastructure Management isn't cheap at all. It's a complex tool, so you have to pay more. No one is happy with a large bill to pay, but if it's a complex product and you designed a complex solution to be monitored, it'll be your fault that you need to buy an expensive product, and that would be implicit in the design of DX Unified Infrastructure Management. Monitoring is just a small part of it. Sometimes you have to pay a significant amount of money for a complex yet very good solution."
"The license cost depends on the number of probes and robots."
"The product-price ratio is better than other brands such as Fortinet or SonicWall."
"Reasonable setup cost and licensing prices."
"ManageEngine OpManager is cheaper than SolarWinds."
"It is not really expensive; it is nominal licensing."
"The pricing is moderate."
"In terms of pricing, I would rate it a two out of five. It was expensive."
"Pricing for ManageEngine OpManager depends on the number of nodes you onboard and whatever pricing is reflected on the ManageEngine portal which offers discounts from ten percent to fifteen percent. It purely depends on the sales volume and the negotiation. In my organization, there are about one thousand two hundred nodes which cost around $29,000 per year. There's no additional support fee or maintenance fee from ManageEngine OpManager. Pricing for the solution is highly competitive and I would rate it five out of five. ManageEngine OpManager is one of the most competitive options out there."
"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."
"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."
"The product is not worth the money."
More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
6%
Educational Organization
31%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for DX Infrastructure Manager?
We are an integrating company that offers DX Unified Infrastructure Management to customers. We help them set it up, do the integration, and provide support. Our end customers include financial ins...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Infrastructure Manager?
I would recommend DX Unified Infrastructure Management to others as it is a good and reliable solution. I would rate it nine out of ten due to its robust functionality and capability to support inf...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Infrastructure Manager?
The pricing of DX Unified Infrastructure Management is high and often a concern for customers. The cost is higher compared to other Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs), which is feedback we hav...
See all answers
What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?
The product provides intensive reports.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?
The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?
For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am co...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Datadog vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 26% of the time
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Zabbix vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 22% of the time
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 19% of the time
Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Dynatrace vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 17% of the time
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager vs DX Unified Infrastructure Management
Compared 15% of the time
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Competitors
SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 25% of the time
Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 16% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 14% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 6% of the time
Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager Logo
Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager
Compared 5% of the time
More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
April 2025
DX Unified Infrastructure Management reportDownload DX Unified Infrastructure Management product report
Buyer's Guide
ManageEngine OpManager
April 2025
ManageEngine OpManager reportDownload ManageEngine OpManager product report
 

Also Known As

DX Infrastructure Manager, DX Infrastructure Manager for Z Systems and CA UIM for zSystems, CA UIM (DX Infrastructure Manager), CA Nimsoft Monitor, CA UIM, DX Infrastructure Manager
OpManager
 

Overview

DX Unified Infrastructure Management is the only solution that provides an open architecture, full-stack observability and zero-touch configuration for monitoring traditional data center, public cloud, and hybrid infrastructure environments.

Designed to ensure an optimal end-user experience, this solution provides a modern HTML5 operations console that makes it easy and fast for today’s IT teams to implement, use, and scale – leading to faster time to value.

Broadcom

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine
 

Sample Customers

CBNCloud, IIJ Global Singapore, AT&S, AXSOS, Aozora Bank, HCL Technologies, IntelliNet, Securex
Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC
Buyer's Guide
DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager
April 2025
Free Report: DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.