It is not cheap.
Pricing and licensing is quite expensive. But for the value the product provides, it seems at par in the market.
It is not cheap.
Pricing and licensing is quite expensive. But for the value the product provides, it seems at par in the market.
It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing.
It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.
It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing.
It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.
Decodes on less used/popular protocols are available, but they should be included. Additional investment should not be required.
Pricing is based on the number of servers monitored, so for big applications, it is a bit expensive.
Decodes on less used/popular protocols are available, but they should be included. Additional investment should not be required.
Pricing is based on the number of servers monitored, so for big applications, it is a bit expensive.
If it’s the right tool, it doesn’t matter what it costs because you’re going to get it back many-fold from your productivity.
New Relic is either free with low retention and minimal functionalities, or expensive with full options and retention.
If it’s the right tool, it doesn’t matter what it costs because you’re going to get it back many-fold from your productivity.
New Relic is either free with low retention and minimal functionalities, or expensive with full options and retention.
Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects.
The price of the solution is reasonable.
Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects.
The price of the solution is reasonable.
The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate.
The cost is prohibitive.
The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate.
The cost is prohibitive.
Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay.
The price of Elastic Observability is expensive.
Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay.
The price of Elastic Observability is expensive.
The solutions are not the cheapest but are robust and stable. License model is rather complex and BMC do often change the model.
Pricing is very high.
The solutions are not the cheapest but are robust and stable. License model is rather complex and BMC do often change the model.
Pricing is very high.
I am currently using a self-hosted open version.
We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service.
I am currently using a self-hosted open version.
We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service.
The pricing for AWS X-Ray is a six out of ten.
The solution is a bit expensive.
The pricing for AWS X-Ray is a six out of ten.
The solution is a bit expensive.
The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage.
The cost could be lower.
The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage.
The cost could be lower.
Pricing and licensing is fair for what you get. It does have a great bang-for-the-buck appeal.
The product might cost you $30,000 USD to buy, but scaling this solution requires the purchase of additional polling engines at $20,000 USD each.
Pricing and licensing is fair for what you get. It does have a great bang-for-the-buck appeal.
The product might cost you $30,000 USD to buy, but scaling this solution requires the purchase of additional polling engines at $20,000 USD each.
Educational pricing is available for this solution.
We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.
Educational pricing is available for this solution.
We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.
You will get the best price if you get a single global deal.
Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements.
You will get the best price if you get a single global deal.
Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements.
This is an open-source solution.
The solution is not expensive.
This is an open-source solution.
The solution is not expensive.
Pricing is reasonable compared to other products.
I'm not sure, but it's expensive. We don't pay any additional fees.
Pricing is reasonable compared to other products.
I'm not sure, but it's expensive. We don't pay any additional fees.
The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors.
The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors.
The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors.
The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors.
I would prefer that the price be reduced, as it would be easier to implement it and to sell it.
Splunk pricing is high.
I would prefer that the price be reduced, as it would be easier to implement it and to sell it.
Splunk pricing is high.
If using eG for virtual desktops, carefully calculate whether per named user, per concurrent user, or per server
It'd be nice if the price was lower. That would be an improvement.
If using eG for virtual desktops, carefully calculate whether per named user, per concurrent user, or per server
It'd be nice if the price was lower. That would be an improvement.
We are paying roughly $5,000 a month.
The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested.
We are paying roughly $5,000 a month.
The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested.
It is a cost-effective solution.
The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price.
It is a cost-effective solution.
The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price.
The price of Slunk APM is less than some of its competitors.
The pricing is reasonable.
The price of Slunk APM is less than some of its competitors.
The pricing is reasonable.
The pricing for this solution could be improved, as it is a very expensive product.
There are different types of licenses available.
The pricing for this solution could be improved, as it is a very expensive product.
There are different types of licenses available.
This price of this solution is reasonable.
The license was paid yearly and included technical support.
This price of this solution is reasonable.
The license was paid yearly and included technical support.
This price of this product is expensive.
AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors.
This price of this product is expensive.
AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors.
