We performed a comparison between Grafana and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Grafana is the favored choice over Broadcom DX Application Performance Management due to its customizable dashboards, good integration with other tools, user-friendly monitoring tool, and helpful community and technical support. However, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is commended for its easy deployment and compatibility, but criticized for its lack of tool integration and poor customer service.
"The time it takes to track problems in applications is the most valuable return that we have from this solution."
"Standard available reports provide us with an automatic insight into the top ten situations to watch. It would have been extremely difficult to program such a report ourselves, and to my knowledge no other competitor can match this functionality."
"We are using the on-premise and cloud versions of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management."
"We are able to easily and quickly find some of the problems with the applications and coding, and some of the performance problems."
"It helps us prioritize application performance issues. It has assisted triage where we can drill down and see where exactly the problem lies."
"JVM memory monitoring and connection pool monitoring are valuable features."
"Service maturity when you can retrieve the normal metrics for every major aspect of each module and delivering this info to the correct eyes."
"Measurement of response time"
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"The installation process is easy. We have deployed it on the cloud. I have around 20 to 30 people using the solution in my company."
"It is a stable, reliable product."
"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable aspect is customization. There are many customizations possible, so I like that."
"Upgradability to it is a project instead of a patch. If it was actually an automated process to where it just fed updates to our product that would be great. Now, we have to spin up an effort to actually upgrade the solution."
"The interface is getting a little old."
"It doesn't have a proper database, and the configuration is very difficult."
"The upcoming changes for the deployment process of the agent will help a lot, in that others have gotten to that point first."
"Documentation needs to be centralized."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive and address support tickets more quickly."
"We need more capabilities to analyze the information that tools collects; for example, using artificial intelligence, or something like that."
"User Experience is a BIG one. Integration of all of APM components into one swift deployment."
"I have a problem with Grafana in the area of documentation."
"The formatting could be better."
"They should improve the functioning of its editing tool."
"The service dashboard is very hard and needs improvement."
"It can take a considerable amount of time to learn the graphs if a long duration is selected."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"If there was an issue on one node, we couldn't drill down and see all the issues on other nodes."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and New Relic, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.