We performed a comparison between eG Enterprise and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The topology view which provides a visual representation of a service and quickly allows identification of errors or degraded performance."
"Single pane of glass to review status of the full environment."
"User session details"
"The auto-configuration or auto-Thresholding is very important because it saves a phenomenal amount of labor and setup costs and time."
"The algorithm is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"eG Enterprise has a single pane of glass for observability and monitoring."
"It gives good insight into inside of what's going on with Exchange."
"Enormous capability to monitor Citrix environments."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"Compatibility with Prometheus databases and the Spring Boot application make it the first choice when moving toward an SRE model."
"The dashboards are the most valuable features."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable."
"There are multiple kinds of models there to create dashboards, which is quite useful."
"Great capacity planning and the solution has a great GUI."
"I can understand why they designed the user interface (UI) the way they did, but sometimes in the management of the eG Manager, it can be a bit clunky."
"Dashboards are difficult to create, and not so useful."
"The solution should improve on the security side and include some more API integrations into wider application platforms."
"eG Enterprise's licensing could be cheaper. Even compared to Dynatrace, I think the price is quite expensive considering the APM functionalities, even though they have other benefits such as info monitoring."
"Application TCP latency is an area with room for improvement, but I believe this is already on the roadmap."
"Back-end configuration is not easy to implement."
"The integration must be improved."
"Needs to improve the networking monitor capabilities."
"Lacks in-depth graphs and sufficient AI."
"Writing queries can be a bit difficult because the syntax must be maintained."
"The product's configuration for saving files could be improved."
"The solution should include online support."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"It's difficult to see the trends on the graph when the range is too long."
"Grafana need to improve the logging functionality."
"Its interface could be more accessible."
eG Enterprise is ranked 40th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 21 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews. eG Enterprise is rated 8.2, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of eG Enterprise writes "Great visibility, easy to set up, and has very responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". eG Enterprise is most compared with ControlUp, Zabbix, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our Grafana vs. eG Enterprise report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.