Grafana vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Grafana Labs Logo
12,845 views|8,858 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Kovai.co Logo
256 views|102 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Grafana and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution has good features.""The most valuable thing was that it had a good visualization tool.""The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable.""It has good stability.""The dashboards are the most valuable features.""This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time.""Provides good dashboard visualization.""There are multiple kinds of models there to create dashboards, which is quite useful."

More Grafana Pros →

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.""Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Pros →

Cons
"If there was an issue on one node, we couldn't drill down and see all the issues on other nodes.""There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring.""It would be helpful if they simplified the data source.""The solution should include online support.""The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring.""One area for improvement in Grafana is that depending on your version, you have to pay for the features, making the license expensive. It would be great if the licensing model could be more flexible. In the next release of Grafana, I want cluster creation to be available, which would help in Grafana deployment and scaling. Currently, the scaling process for the solution is a bit complicated.""There are some areas of network drives that are not showing as expected based on server usage.""More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."

More Grafana Cons →

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications.""The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​Grafana is free and open source.​"
  • "I use the open source model so it is free."
  • "My company uses the open-source version of Grafana, so it's free."
  • "We use the open-source version of Grafana."
  • "We are using the open-source license."
  • "I give the price an eight out of ten."
  • "You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Grafana Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
    Top Answer:For me, Grafana is a cheap tool because I don't have to spend much time learning the product since it is a simple solution. I don't know if there are different paid versions of the product.
    Top Answer:I have a problem with Grafana in the area of documentation. There is a problem in the area of some graphs where you connect elements. With Grafana, there is only one name that can be included for ten… more »
    Top Answer:It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services.
    Top Answer:1) The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use. 2) The addition of management and monitoring features for Cognitive services, Power Automate, and… more »
    Top Answer:We used the product mainly to manage our more than five different Azure services that were in our production environment. Serverless360 also stands out with its ability to track the flow of messages… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    12,845
    Comparisons
    8,858
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    387
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    256
    Comparisons
    102
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Serverless360
    Learn More
    Grafana Labs
    Video Not Available
    Kovai.co
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Grafana is an open-source visualization and analytics platform that stands out in the field of monitoring solutions. Grafana is widely recognized for its powerful, easy-to-set-up dashboards and visualizations. Grafana supports integration with a wide array of data sources and tools, including Prometheus, InfluxDB, MySQL, Splunk, and Elasticsearch, enhancing its versatility. Grafana has open-source and cloud options; the open-source version is a good choice for organizations with the resources to manage their infrastructure and want more control over their deployment. The cloud service is a good choice if you want a fully managed solution that is easy to start with and scale.

    A key strength of Grafana lies in its ability to explore, visualize, query, and alert on the collected data through operational dashboards. These dashboards are highly customizable and visually appealing, making them a valuable asset for data analysis, performance tracking, trend spotting, and detecting irregularities.

    Grafana provides both an open-source solution with an active community and Grafana Cloud, a fully managed and composable observability offering that packages together metrics, logs, and traces with Grafana. The open-source version is licensed under the Affero General Public License version 3.0 (AGPLv3), being free and unlimited. Grafana Cloud and Grafana Enterprise are available for more advanced needs, catering to a wider range of organizational requirements. Grafana offers options for self-managed backend systems or fully managed services via Grafana Cloud. Grafana Cloud extends observability with a wide range of solutions for infrastructure monitoring, IRM, load testing, Kubernetes monitoring, continuous profiling, frontend observability, and more.

    The Grafana users we interviewed generally appreciate Grafana's ability to connect with various data sources, its straightforward usability, and its integration capabilities, especially in developer-oriented environments. The platform is noted for its practical alert configurations, ticketing backend integration, and as a powerful tool for developing dashboards. However, some users find a learning curve in the initial setup and mention the need for time investment to customize and leverage Grafana effectively. There are also calls for clearer documentation and simplification of notification alert templates.

    In summary, Grafana is a comprehensive solution for data visualization and monitoring, widely used across industries for its versatility, ease of use, and extensive integration options. It suits organizations seeking a customizable and scalable platform for visualizing time-series data from diverse sources. However, users should be prepared for some complexity in setup and customization and may need to invest time in learning and tailoring the system to their specific needs.

    Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is an advanced Cloud Management platform that empowers you with significant Azure Cost savings and Infra Monitoring for complex Azure Environments. Our customers have experienced annual savings of up to 30% through advanced cost monitoring, granular analysis, optimization insights, and reduced incident resolution time by 80% through holistic infra monitoring across multiple Azure resources with business context. Also, our platform stands out by offering all the necessary features for incorporating FinOps practice into your organization, ensuring an accurate and granular source of truth about costs for all your stakeholders. By seamlessly offering infrastructure monitoring and cost management in one place, we aim to help maximize your ROI on Azure investments.

    Our Core features:

    1. Get clarity on your investments: Get unparalleled visibility of your spending with advanced Azure cost analysis across Azure tenants, teams and any business units.
    2. Eliminate wasteful spending: Ensure cost reductions through strategic recommendations for rightsizing resources/purchasing reserved instances and setting up auto-pausing of resources outside business hours.
    3. Accelerate incident resolution: Tie monitoring alerts to business units and remediate faster with a single report spotlighting critical issues across Azure services, streamlining your focus on troubleshooting.
    4. End-to-end business tracking: Bring business context over the messages flowing through intricate Azure/hybrid integration for effectively tracking and troubleshooting critical issues.
    5. Technical Azure Documentation: Auto-generate documentations on resource usage, cost/security and generate editable diagrams for seamlessly sharing them with relevant stakeholders.
      Sample Customers
      Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
      MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF
      Top Industries
      REVIEWERS
      Retailer21%
      Computer Software Company21%
      Comms Service Provider14%
      Financial Services Firm14%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Computer Software Company14%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Retailer6%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Computer Software Company39%
      Manufacturing Company16%
      Financial Services Firm11%
      Insurance Company5%
      Company Size
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business33%
      Midsize Enterprise19%
      Large Enterprise47%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business18%
      Midsize Enterprise12%
      Large Enterprise70%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business35%
      Midsize Enterprise9%
      Large Enterprise56%
      Buyer's Guide
      Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
      769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 41st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. Grafana is rated 8.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

      See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

      We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.