We performed a comparison between Grafana and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good features."
"The most valuable thing was that it had a good visualization tool."
"The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable."
"It has good stability."
"The dashboards are the most valuable features."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"Provides good dashboard visualization."
"There are multiple kinds of models there to create dashboards, which is quite useful."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"If there was an issue on one node, we couldn't drill down and see all the issues on other nodes."
"There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring."
"It would be helpful if they simplified the data source."
"The solution should include online support."
"The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring."
"One area for improvement in Grafana is that depending on your version, you have to pay for the features, making the license expensive. It would be great if the licensing model could be more flexible. In the next release of Grafana, I want cluster creation to be available, which would help in Grafana deployment and scaling. Currently, the scaling process for the solution is a bit complicated."
"There are some areas of network drives that are not showing as expected based on server usage."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 41st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. Grafana is rated 8.0, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our Grafana vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.