We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable."
"The solution can scale well."
"The dashboards are the most valuable features."
"Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product."
"The most valuable feature of Grafana is the ease to build dashboards from observability construction. Additionally, the page services and integration are good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the UI dashboard because we need to create a dashboard on Grafana to monitor our data."
"The most valuable thing was that it had a good visualization tool."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The look and feel of the charting and graph capabilities in Grafana could improve. If they provided a storyboard type of feature as they have in other solutions, such as PowerBI. The multi-tenanted and stitch metrics features could improve."
"Lacks in-depth graphs and sufficient AI."
"I find issues with Grafana. For example, I am unable to open some services there. Then, we have to open ten different tabs to get it fixed. And it's annoying when there's something going on; we want to check Grafana, and it throws four different errors."
"Lacks event management which affects our DevOps people."
"It would be helpful if they simplified the data source."
"Grafana doesn't provide anything for reporting."
"There is a need for improvement in automating daily monitoring reports, especially when alerts are triggered due to system downtimes or fluctuations."
"The product's configuration for saving files could be improved."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver). See our Coralogix vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
