You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Grafana Labs Logo
10,753 views|7,018 comparisons
Sentry Logo
7,537 views|6,629 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jun 29, 2023

We performed a comparison between Grafana and Sentry based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users have found that Grafana's initial setup can be anywhere from easy to difficult based on their experience and requirements, while Sentry's setup is generally considered to be less complicated, although some system administrators have encountered difficulties.
  • Features: Grafana offers customizable graphs, open source capabilities, and flexible integration, while Sentry is accurate with error management and security. Grafana prioritizes UI dashboards and monitoring, whereas Sentry is more proficient in error tracking and rule creation.
  • Pricing: Grafana's cost varies based on metrics ingested per day, while Sentry offers a free plan for early stages. Grafana can be resource-heavy, while Sentry's open source version is feature-rich. Grafana's pricing is moderate, while Sentry's license is costly but valuable.
  • Service and Support: The quality of customer service provided by Grafana is inconsistent and dependent on individual preferences. Some users have had positive experiences, while others have not. On the other hand, Sentry's customer service is limited, but users who have utilized the community support forums and documentation have found them useful.
  • ROI: Grafana offers improved data visualization and analytics for a better understanding of applications and infrastructure, while investing in Sentry has resulted in favorable returns.

Comparison Results: Grafana offers customization and visually pleasing graphs, integration with various tools, and serves multiple purposes. Its open source nature, better customer support, straightforward setup process, and flexible licensing model give it an edge over Sentry and makes it the preferred solution. Although Sentry is also appreciated for its accuracy, error management, and security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana vs. Sentry Report (Updated: November 2023).
746,635 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution can scale well.""It excels in providing comprehensive details when there are downtimes or fluctuations, offering thorough reports.""Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days.""The dashboards are the most valuable features.""It integrates well with other solutions.""It is a stable solution.""The solution has good features.""We can write queries in different languages, which is beneficial for visualization."

More Grafana Pros →

"The product performs well.""Sentry is a pretty stable product... Sentry's documentation is pretty straightforward and neat.""The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides.""Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs.""The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users.""The solution is user-friendly.""It's a great visibility tool for the developer team.""The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

More Sentry Pros →

"Its interface could be more accessible.""Grafana doesn't provide anything for reporting.""There are some areas of network drives that are not showing as expected based on server usage.""Grafana need to improve the logging functionality.""One area for improvement in Grafana is that depending on your version, you have to pay for the features, making the license expensive. It would be great if the licensing model could be more flexible. In the next release of Grafana, I want cluster creation to be available, which would help in Grafana deployment and scaling. Currently, the scaling process for the solution is a bit complicated.""Writing queries can be a bit difficult because the syntax must be maintained.""The formatting could be better.""There is a need for improvement in automating daily monitoring reports, especially when alerts are triggered due to system downtimes or fluctuations."

More Grafana Cons →

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved.""We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved.""The price could be lowered.""I would like to see a role registration feature added.""The settings for an administrator are complex.""To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features.""I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release.""It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location."

More Sentry Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I use the open source model so it is free."
  • "My company uses the open-source version of Grafana, so it's free."
  • "We use the open-source version of Grafana."
  • "We are using the open-source license."
  • "I give the price an eight out of ten."
  • "You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "Since Grafana is an open-source solution, it is free of cost."
  • More Grafana Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I am currently using a self-hosted open version."
  • "We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."
  • "We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."
  • More Sentry Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    746,635 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It excels in providing comprehensive details when there are downtimes or fluctuations, offering thorough reports.
    Top Answer:It's free of cost; it operates as an open-source tool.
    Top Answer:There is a need for improvement in automating daily monitoring reports, especially when alerts are triggered due to system downtimes or fluctuations. This enhancement would make the monitoring tool… more »
    Top Answer:The product costs $26 a month if we choose a yearly subscription. Code coverage can be added for an additional $29 per month. The Team plan is the cheapest package available. We can make our own… more »
    Top Answer:It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Azure Monitor logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    New Relic logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Datadog logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Elastic Observability logo
    Compared 11% of the time.
    AWS X-Ray logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Learn More
    Grafana Labs
    Video Not Available
    Video Not Available

    Grafana is an open-source visualization and analytics platform that stands out in the field of monitoring solutions. Grafana is widely recognized for its powerful, easy-to-set-up dashboards and visualizations. Grafana supports integration with a wide array of data sources and tools, including Prometheus, InfluxDB, MySQL, Splunk, and Elasticsearch, enhancing its versatility. Grafana has open-source and cloud options; the open-source version is a good choice for organizations with the resources to manage their infrastructure and want more control over their deployment. The cloud service is a good choice if you want a fully managed solution that is easy to start with and scale.

    A key strength of Grafana lies in its ability to explore, visualize, query, and alert on the collected data through operational dashboards. These dashboards are highly customizable and visually appealing, making them a valuable asset for data analysis, performance tracking, trend spotting, and detecting irregularities.

    Grafana provides both an open-source solution with an active community and Grafana Cloud, a fully managed and composable observability offering that packages together metrics, logs, and traces with Grafana. The open-source version is licensed under the Affero General Public License version 3.0 (AGPLv3), being free and unlimited. Grafana Cloud and Grafana Enterprise are available for more advanced needs, catering to a wider range of organizational requirements. Grafana offers options for self-managed backend systems or fully managed services via Grafana Cloud. Grafana Cloud extends observability with a wide range of solutions for infrastructure monitoring, IRM, load testing, Kubernetes monitoring, continuous profiling, frontend observability, and more.

    The Grafana users we interviewed generally appreciate Grafana's ability to connect with various data sources, its straightforward usability, and its integration capabilities, especially in developer-oriented environments. The platform is noted for its practical alert configurations, ticketing backend integration, and as a powerful tool for developing dashboards. However, some users find a learning curve in the initial setup and mention the need for time investment to customize and leverage Grafana effectively. There are also calls for clearer documentation and simplification of notification alert templates.

    In summary, Grafana is a comprehensive solution for data visualization and monitoring, widely used across industries for its versatility, ease of use, and extensive integration options. It suits organizations seeking a customizable and scalable platform for visualizing time-series data from diverse sources. However, users should be prepared for some complexity in setup and customization and may need to invest time in learning and tailoring the system to their specific needs.

    Sentry’s real-time error tracking gives you insight into production deployments and information to reproduce and fix crashes.

    Learn more about Grafana
    Learn more about Sentry
    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
    Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Small Business70%
    Large Enterprise30%
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Grafana vs. Sentry
    November 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: November 2023.
    746,635 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 33 reviews while Sentry is ranked 8th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 10 reviews. Grafana is rated 7.8, while Sentry is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sentry writes "A stable alert management application with straightforward and neat documentation". Grafana is most compared with Azure Monitor, Dynatrace, New Relic, and Elastic Observability, whereas Sentry is most compared with Azure Monitor, New Relic, Datadog, Elastic Observability and AWS X-Ray. See our Grafana vs. Sentry report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.