Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Monitor vs Grafana comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (5th)
Grafana
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 10.0%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana is 7.1%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

NK
Jan 11, 2023
Excellent visibility options but integration could be better
I mainly use Azure Monitor to monitor my WordPress site for availability, performance, and error logs Azure Monitor provides visibility and proactive alerts, which means that if anything happens, I get automated alerts from the performance monitoring tool and can fix the problem. Azure Monitor's…
Jorge Florez - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 24, 2023
Feature-rich and has many integrations and good community support
I'm currently using Grafana. My company is a Grafana customer. I'm using the open-source version of Grafana, 9.3. Between sixty and one hundred people, mostly software engineers, use the solution in my company. Grafana requires maintenance, and that's the responsibility of the entire team. There's a plan to increase the usage of Grafana in other areas besides engineering. My company plans to create dashboards for data in other areas. I advise people who want to use the solution to try it out first. For example, Grafana has many good integrations if you need to gather metrics, and you can technically use any query to create dashboards and graphs inside Grafana. I advise that you explore the solution. My rating for Grafana is eight out of ten because it's a very good product. It's complete and has an open-source version with many features. However, some of its interface capabilities could be cheaper.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."
"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."
"You can scale the product."
"The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."
"The most valuable features of Azure Monitor are the login analytics workspace and we can write any kind of custom queries in order to receive the data that is inserted into the login analytics workspace, diagnostic settings, et cetera."
"The solution integrates well with the Microsoft platform."
"It excels in providing comprehensive details when there are downtimes or fluctuations, offering thorough reports."
"It's easy to make changes. We can put many dashboards in one place. There's no delay in showing data - what you see on Grafana matches the server metrics."
"The most valuable aspect is customization. There are many customizations possible, so I like that."
"The most important feature of Grafana is its alarm formatting capability."
"It gives us the visibility we need. I like that when we add deployment markers or release markers, we know exactly when an issue arises. For instance, if there is an increased usage of CPU, we can link it directly to the deployment that might have caused the issue. It increases productivity and observability. We can now easily tell when a certain issue arises. It's way easier to debug because it can point you to certain things based on these markers, and we can debug easier."
"The best feature was the creation of graphs and trends."
"Compatibility with Prometheus databases and the Spring Boot application make it the first choice when moving toward an SRE model."
"The solution can scale well."
 

Cons

"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."
"It's really complex to retrieve or query the logs in Azure Monitor."
"In terms of pricing, Azure Monitor's billing based on data size can sometimes lead to increased costs, especially when developers need to purge data frequently. While there are mechanisms in place to track and manage this, there is room for improvement in terms of optimizing data pausing and related processes. Enhancements in this area could help mitigate potential billing concerns and provide a more seamless experience for users."
"I need connectivity with cost management."
"They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."
"Lacks information including details related to where problems lie."
"They need to work with other cloud providers - not just Azure."
"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
"I would like the ability to download my results into any format in order to share the information with my clients."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"The service dashboard is very hard and needs improvement."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"It's difficult to see the trends on the graph when the range is too long."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"
"The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
"The tool's pricing is very good. I could say that Microsoft offers different cost models, which are listed on the product's website."
"The Azure Insight is a little bit expensive."
"The licensing is a monthly fee."
"My company is okay with the current pricing of the solution."
"It's a costly solution"
"Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."
"Since Grafana is an open-source solution, it is free of cost."
"We are using the open-source license."
"I use the open source model so it is free."
"For me, Grafana is a cheap tool because I don't have to spend much time learning the product since it is a simple solution."
"My company uses the open-source version of Grafana, so it's free."
"​Grafana is free and open source.​"
"You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use."
"The solution is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
800,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
I believe Azure Monitor is already a top-notch solution with excellent functionality and there is not much I would suggest for improvement. However, there is one limitation that certain features re...
What do you like most about Grafana?
The product's initial setup phase was very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana?
For me, Grafana is a cheap tool because I don't have to spend much time learning the product since it is a simple solution. I don't know if there are different paid versions of the product.
What needs improvement with Grafana?
Grafana could improve by having its own query language. Currently, it uses languages like Prometheus or InfluxDB, which not everyone knows. Their query language should be easier.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Grafana and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
800,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.