Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Grafana Labs and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Grafana Labs is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.2. Grafana Labs holds a 2.5% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Grafana Labs users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Grafana

Read 50 Grafana reviews

14,886 Views
13,993 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 29 OpenText SiteScope reviews

5,410 Views
5,085 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Grafana

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Grafana are prominent tools in the monitoring and observability space. Grafana appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced visualization features and flexibility.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Grafana?

OpenText SiteScope offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, extensive built-in alerts, and reliable customer support. Grafana provides advanced visualization features, a wide range of plugins, and easy integration with various data sources.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Grafana?

OpenText SiteScope could benefit from a more modern design, enhanced integration capabilities, and improved user interface. Grafana could improve its alerting system, provide better default support for non-technical users, and strengthen its customer support.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Grafana?

OpenText SiteScope is noted for robust customer support, thorough documentation, and a smoother deployment process. Grafana, while easy to use, may encounter criticism for less comprehensive customer support and slightly more challenging deployment.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Grafana?

OpenText SiteScope users report higher initial setup costs but recognize good ROI due to extensive features and reliable support. Grafana users benefit from competitive pricing, particularly for small to medium-sized organizations, and see substantial ROI from its powerful features and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Grafana vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Grafana vs. OpenText SiteScope

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,109 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Grafana

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Grafana is 2.5%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Grafana	2.5%
OpenText SiteScope	1.2%
Other	96.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Vitthal Gole

Devops Engineer at AIQOD

Proactive monitoring has transformed how our teams detect issues and resolve incidents faster

For improving Grafana, the alert configuration could be more intuitive for new users. Dashboard management becomes complex in large environments. So if we have multiple environments and we have to manage our dashboards for them, sometimes it becomes complicated to manage all the dashboards. The learning curve is steep for beginners. More built-in reporting and analytics features would be helpful. Documentation for advanced features could be more detailed. Role-based access management could be simpler to configure. Performance could be optimized for very large dashboards with high cardinality data sources. Grafana could improve its alert configuration workflow and make advanced dashboard management easier for new users. More built-in reporting features would also be beneficial. A simpler onboarding experience for first-time users and more built-in dashboard templates for common monitoring scenarios would be helpful. Grafana is a powerful monitoring platform, but it could improve dashboard organization in large environments, simplify alert management, provide more built-in reporting capabilities, enhance plugin compatibility during upgrades, and offer better AI-driven insights for fast root cause analysis. For example, if we are hitting a CPU metric of ninety to ninety-five percent or a system load of seventy to eighty percent, we have to act on that. But if Grafana suggests something on that metric, such as an AI suggestion, it would be more helpful. We could get an idea of how to solve that issue. For the Grafana dashboards, they could provide more built-in compliance and audit reporting, enhance AI recommendations with clearer explanations of why an issue was flagged, enhance accessibility and keyboard navigation, add more native integrations with emerging cloud and DevOps tools, and improve scalability for very large enterprise deployments. Grafana is a mature platform, but it could benefit from better dashboard version control, simpler environment migration, enhanced AI explanations, more built-in reporting, and improved performance for large-scale deployments with complex dashboards.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Proactive monitoring has reduced response time and has improved capacity planning accuracy

Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring dashboard user, I do not have any negative feedback. A feature that could be added is direct integration with a ticketing tool, as it would help operation teams directly detect alarms and alerts happening in our infrastructure. Direct integration with a ticketing tool such as Remedy would be a good feature. OpenText SiteScope has some limitations, especially with integration between OpenText SiteScope and Remedy, which must be done through middle software. There are also limitations for cloud monitoring as well as for Docker and Kubernetes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The dashboards are the most valuable features."

"What I found most valuable in Grafana is that it has a lot of integrations and features that I need for data processing and visualization."

"The most valuable feature of Grafana is the ease to build dashboards from observability construction. Additionally, the page services and integration are good."

"It's easy to make changes. We can put many dashboards in one place. There's no delay in showing data - what you see on Grafana matches the server metrics."

"The solution can scale well."

"Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product."

"Grafana integrates with some of the tools we've chosen beforehand, and while I'm not the right person to elaborate on this since I'm more focused on managing big teams, the teams working with it seem happy."

"The initial setup is straightforward with just a few clicks on the solution's cloud."

More Grafana pros

"I would rate the stability of OpenText SiteScope as excellent."

"For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful."

"They can create workflows for approval processes, which is very useful to support paperless digitalization, allowing effective collaboration between many parties including approvers, reviewers, and engineering documents being signed, annotated, and marked up using this system."

"System health check monitoring and email alerts after reaching threshold limits."

"Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours."

"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."

"The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product."

"Managing SiteScope is not as difficult as its reveal."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"I find that the alerting UI in Grafana can be complex for new users."

"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."

"I don't believe that Grafana fulfilled the requirements completely. That's why we moved to Datadog."

"Its interface could be more accessible."

"Writing queries can be a bit difficult because the syntax must be maintained."

"Regarding joining between queries, merging between two queries that give the same information could be simple, and there are some ways to do that, but if there was something even easier, it would be great."

"The solution has room for improvement with a better API to help automate the construction of the dashboards easier."

"The look and feel of the charting and graph capabilities in Grafana could improve."

More Grafana cons

"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"We'll probably remove SiteScope shortly because we've been using another monitoring tool in production. SiteScope is just not something we use very much of any more."

"Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test."

"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."

"The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability."

"I think that the scalability needs to be worked on a bit. We can scale fine horizontally, but we’d like to scale less horizontal and be more compact."

"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source license."

"The solution is expensive."

"I am using an open-source version"

"I use the open source model so it is free."

"I give the price an eight out of ten."

"Grafana is free and open source."

"It's free of cost; it operates as an open-source tool."

"You need to purchase the solution's license for its commercial use."

More Grafana pricing and cost advice

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	27

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana?

We are using the community edition. We have used the community edition, the open-source edition. So, there were no licensing costs. The setup was straightforward, and the main investment was the ti...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Grafana?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Grafana?

The main use case for Grafana is that we are using Prometheus to collect the metrics, and primarily use Grafana for infrastructure and application monitoring. It helps me visualize system metrics t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sentry vs Grafana

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Grafana

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Grafana

Compared 5% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Grafana

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs Grafana

Compared 4% of the time

More Grafana Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 6% of the time

Stackify vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Grafana

September 2026

Download Grafana product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

September 2026

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

Grafana offers a customizable, user-friendly platform for robust data visualization and integration, enhancing real-time monitoring with extensive alerting and collaboration capabilities supported by an active open-source community.

Grafana stands out for its flexible dashboards and robust visualization options, integrating smoothly with tools like Prometheus. This open-source platform supports diverse environments, aiding in the visualization of IT infrastructure and business analytics. Its alerting system efficiently supports real-time monitoring. While it is praised for its community backing and cost-effectiveness, there is demand for better data aggregation, intuitive interfaces, and enhanced documentation compared to competitors such as Splunk. Simplification of configuration and the interface is sought, alongside improvements in machine learning and reporting features.

What are Grafana's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: User-friendly, richly customizable dashboards for precise data presentation.
Visualization Capabilities: Strong support for visualizing complex datasets from multiple sources.
Integration Options: Extensive compatibility with data sources and tools like Prometheus.
Alerting System: Efficient real-time monitoring and issue identification.
Open-Source Nature: Supported by a vibrant community, offering a cost-effective solution.

What benefits or ROI should users seek in Grafana reviews?

Adaptability: Supports diverse environments and use cases.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers valuable features at a competitive price.
Community Support: Backed by an active and vibrant open-source community.
Collaborative Platform: Seamless integration with various data tools refining monitoring and analytics efforts.

Grafana is implemented widely across industries for monitoring IT infrastructure and visualizing business analytics. Companies utilize it to analyze server performance or monitor Kubernetes environments and payment transactions. The platform integrates with AWS services and other data sources to ensure observability and system health tracking, focusing on performance metrics through customized dashboards and alerts. Organizations employ Grafana to bolster observability and optimize infrastructure through robust data insights.

Grafana Labs

OpenText SiteScope provides agentless monitoring of infrastructure and applications, offering an intuitive experience with comprehensive solutions for managing APIs, URLs, and log files. It's designed for those seeking ease of use and flexibility without the need for server agents.

SiteScope is known for its agentless architecture that facilitates seamless monitoring across a range of technologies including AWS, VMware, and APIs. Users benefit from ready-to-use templates and an intuitive dashboard. Despite its flexibility, SiteScope has challenges with integration and modern features like cloud and DevOps monitoring. The Java interface is slow and setup can be cumbersome, with costly licensing and room for improvement in reporting and scalability.

What are the key features of OpenText SiteScope?

Agentless Architecture: Eliminates the need for server agents, minimizing intrusion.
Ready-to-Use Templates: Simplifies monitoring setup across different environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports server, database, URL, and API monitoring.
Integration Capabilities: Works with AWS, VMware, and other technologies.
Intuitive Dashboard: Provides easy-to-understand data visualization.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Agentless setup reduces operational costs.
Flexibility: Supports multiple technologies and environments.
Time Management: Predefined templates save setup time.
Performance Assurance: Ensures consistent performance with synthetic monitoring.
Operational Insight: Enhances decision-making through comprehensive data visualization.

OpenText SiteScope is implemented in industries like healthcare and government organizations for maintaining system performance and uptime. It supports monitoring across platforms, including Linux, Windows, and VMware, enabling users to address infrastructure and application monitoring needs without agent-related challenges.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Adobe, Optum, Sky, Nvidia, Roblox, Wells Fargo, BlackRock, Informatica, Maersk, Daimler Truck, SNCF, Atlassian, DHL, SAP, JPMorgan Chase, Cisco, Citi and many others.

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

Grafana vs. OpenText SiteScope

September 2026

Free Report: Grafana vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about Grafana vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,109 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Grafana vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.