Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo

Top 10 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Alternatives

Vendor: iGrafx
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to iGrafx Process360 Live Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Appian, and SAP Signavio Process Manager. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

iGrafx Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with iGrafx, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 emphasizes graphical modeling and user-friendly deployment, appealing to non-technical teams focused on process management. In comparison, Camunda offers an open-source environment with a robust execution engine, suited for developers seeking integration flexibility and automation capabilities.
Download Camunda vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform involves a high initial setup cost, while Camunda offers a lower upfront investment, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to implement cost-effective process management solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform involves a high initial setup cost, while Camunda offers a lower upfront investment, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to implement cost-effective process management solutions.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Appian offers strong low-code development and faster ROI. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides comprehensive features such as advanced compliance management. Appian supports easier deployment, while iGrafx offers strategic consultation and various deployment options, appealing to diverse client needs.
Download Appian vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to iGrafx Process360 Live Platform, which offers a more cost-effective setup experience.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian has a higher setup cost compared to iGrafx Process360 Live Platform, which offers a more cost-effective setup experience.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers competitive pricing with strong process modeling and analytics, ideal for cost-focused buyers. In comparison, SAP Signavio Process Manager provides enhanced collaboration tools and comprehensive features, catering to those who prioritize extensive functionality and are comfortable with a higher investment.
Download SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a lower initial setup cost compared to SAP Signavio Process Manager, which might appeal to organizations seeking cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a lower initial setup cost compared to SAP Signavio Process Manager, which might appeal to organizations seeking cost efficiency.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
3.9 out of 5
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect offers competitive pricing and strong customer support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides feature-rich process optimization, with tools for intuitive mapping and collaboration, making it ideal for those prioritizing advanced capabilities over cost.
Download Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect typically incurs a lower initial setup cost compared to iGrafx Process360 Live Platform, which often requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect typically incurs a lower initial setup cost compared to iGrafx Process360 Live Platform, which often requires a higher upfront investment.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Bizagi offers low-code automation and ease of use for rapid deployment, favored for cost-effective setups. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides advanced analytics and enterprise integration, appealing to larger businesses seeking deeper insights and extensive process management.
Download Bizagi vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
Bizagi offers low setup costs, making it accessible for businesses seeking budget-friendly solutions, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform tends to have higher initial costs, reflecting its expansive features and tailored functionalities for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Bizagi offers low setup costs, making it accessible for businesses seeking budget-friendly solutions, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform tends to have higher initial costs, reflecting its expansive features and tailored functionalities for larger enterprises.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Visio
3.9 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Visio
3.9 out of 5
Visio suits budget-conscious buyers with its cost-effective pricing and integration with Microsoft Office for basic process tasks. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers advanced analytics and compliance features, appealing to organizations needing comprehensive process management and strategic decision-making capabilities.
Download Visio vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
Visio typically incurs lower setup costs, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform involves higher initial investments, highlighting a key cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Visio typically incurs lower setup costs, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform involves higher initial investments, highlighting a key cost difference.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
ARIS BPA
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
ARIS BPA
4.1 out of 5
ARIS BPA appeals to enterprises needing detailed process modeling and structured analysis. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers real-time collaboration and integration, appealing to dynamic environments. ARIS BPA's lower upfront cost contrasts with iGrafx's cloud deployment and responsive support for quick implementation.
Download ARIS BPA vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
ARIS BPA has a lower setup cost, offering affordability, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform presents higher initial setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
ARIS BPA has a lower setup cost, offering affordability, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform presents higher initial setup fees.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
IBM Blueworks Live
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
IBM Blueworks Live
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is favored for its detailed process modeling and integration, appealing to organizations focusing on in-depth analysis. In comparison, IBM Blueworks Live excels in collaborative functionalities and quick deployment, suiting businesses that prioritize fast implementation and team collaboration.
Download IBM Blueworks Live vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform features a lower setup cost compared to IBM Blueworks Live, making it a more cost-effective choice for initial implementation. Conversely, IBM Blueworks Live may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform features a lower setup cost compared to IBM Blueworks Live, making it a more cost-effective choice for initial implementation. Conversely, IBM Blueworks Live may involve higher initial expenses.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Visual Paradigm
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Visual Paradigm
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform excels in customer support and cost-effectiveness with seamless deployment. In comparison, Visual Paradigm offers extensive modeling tools, supporting both UML and BPMN, providing a feature-rich platform for organizations seeking a comprehensive solution, appealing to those valuing depth over initial cost.
Download Visual Paradigm vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers straightforward setup with transparent costing, while Visual Paradigm involves a more complex initial setup with potential hidden costs.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers straightforward setup with transparent costing, while Visual Paradigm involves a more complex initial setup with potential hidden costs.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
MEGA HOPEX
3.9 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
MEGA HOPEX
3.9 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform appeals with lower pricing and strong support satisfaction, attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, MEGA HOPEX impresses with comprehensive features, excelling in risk management and compliance, providing value for those seeking an extensive enterprise architecture solution.
Download MEGA HOPEX vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while MEGA HOPEX features a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while MEGA HOPEX features a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
ADONIS
3.9 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
ADONIS
3.9 out of 5
iGrafx stands out for its cost-effective solutions and easy deployment, offering extensive process mapping and scalability. In comparison, ADONIS provides advanced modeling capabilities despite a higher cost and complex setup, appealing to those seeking detailed process management and long-term benefits.
Download ADONIS vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a higher setup cost compared to ADONIS, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a higher setup cost compared to ADONIS, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
iServer
3.7 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
iServer
3.7 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform focuses on process management with affordable pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, iServer, with advanced enterprise architecture features, offers faster deployment and impressive long-term ROI, appealing to those valuing comprehensive functionality despite higher initial costs.
Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs. iServer Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a significant setup cost, whereas iServer offers a more economical setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has a significant setup cost, whereas iServer offers a more economical setup fee.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
ARIS Cloud
4.0 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
ARIS Cloud
4.0 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform excels in intuitive process modeling and rapid deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, ARIS Cloud offers extensive integration and detailed analytics, ideal for those valuing comprehensive features despite higher setup costs, ensuring substantial ROI for complex needs.
Download ARIS Cloud vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has competitive setup costs, while ARIS Cloud offers a flexible pricing model to accommodate different business needs, highlighting their distinct approaches to initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has competitive setup costs, while ARIS Cloud offers a flexible pricing model to accommodate different business needs, highlighting their distinct approaches to initial investment.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
BIC Platform
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
BIC Platform
4.1 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform appeals to those requiring robust integration and analytical capabilities. In comparison, BIC Platform's automation features offer comprehensive process automation. iGrafx may involve detailed setup, while BIC enables rapid deployment. iGrafx offers significant ROI; BIC provides cost-effective solutions and efficiency.
Download BIC Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has higher setup costs compared to the BIC Platform, which offers more budget-friendly options for initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform has higher setup costs compared to the BIC Platform, which offers more budget-friendly options for initial implementation.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform excels in process mapping and compliance management, appealing to businesses focused on meticulous process optimization and risk management. In comparison, Studio Creatio offers strong CRM integration and low-code customization, benefiting organizations prioritizing customer relationship management and agile deployments.
Download Studio Creatio vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
There is a license required for this solution.
The pricing plans are not user-friendly because in many cases you have to buy different options to get additional features.
View comparison
Pricing
There is a license required for this solution.
The pricing plans are not user-friendly because in many cases you have to buy different options to get additional features.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
3.8 out of 5
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
3.8 out of 5

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform appeals to those seeking extensive analytics and responsive customer support. In comparison, SS&C Blue Prism attracts buyers interested in advanced automation and integration capabilities, offering significant efficiency gains despite a potentially higher initial investment.

Download SS&C Blue Prism vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform requires a one-time setup cost, while SS&C Blue Prism has a higher initial fee. SS&C Blue Prism users report a steeper learning curve compared to the more straightforward implementation of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform.
View comparison
Pricing
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform requires a one-time setup cost, while SS&C Blue Prism has a higher initial fee. SS&C Blue Prism users report a steeper learning curve compared to the more straightforward implementation of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
IBM Case Foundation
3.9 out of 5
IBM Case Foundation is favored for robust technical support and competitive pricing, appealing to companies needing strong support and solid integration. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform appeals to those seeking advanced process modeling and analytics, offering cloud-based deployment and significant long-term ROI.
Download IBM Case Foundation vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
IBM Case Foundation requires significant upfront investment for setup, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Case Foundation requires significant upfront investment for setup, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers a more cost-effective setup option.
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center
4.5 out of 5
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center emphasizes compliance management and customizable reporting with flexible deployment and personalized support. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform excels in advanced modeling, simulation, and cloud-based deployment, appealing to buyers prioritizing detailed process insights and long-term value over immediate affordability.
Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center involves a moderate setup cost, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers a lower cost for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center involves a moderate setup cost, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers a lower cost for setup.

Related categories

Business Process Design
Business Process Management (BPM)
Process Mining