Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is iServer?

Featured iServer reviews

iServer mindshare

Product category:
As of August 2025, the mindshare of iServer in the Enterprise Architecture Management category stands at 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Architecture Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
iServer4.5%
LeanIX15.3%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect12.7%
Other67.5%
Enterprise Architecture Management
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business106
Midsize Enterprise68
Large Enterprise388
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Construction Company
5%
Computer Software Company
5%
Retailer
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Transportation Company
4%
University
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Non Profit
2%
Media Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Import And Exporter
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
 
iServer Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior IT Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.5We use iServer for establishing an enterprise architecture function due to its flexibility, ease of use, and integration with Microsoft tools. While it's user-friendly and customizable, the embedded drawing tool, draw.io, needs improvements. Competitors considered included LeanIX and MEGA HOPEX.
Enterprise Architecture practice head at Positive Side Consultancy4.0iServer assists us in governance and workflow management, especially useful in our government entity. While valuable features include document management integration with Microsoft Word, it lacks updates and new features for its on-premise version since 2021, such as process mining.
Consultant at a government with 11-50 employees4.0I use iServer to catalog systems and trace them to business processes. Its reporting capabilities are valuable, though clarifying details with the vendor can be time-consuming. Integrating it with Sparx enhances functionality, resulting in seamless and high-quality performance.
Business Architect at Netcompany3.5We use iServer for enterprise architecture documentation and find its customized model valuable. However, the platform's user interface could be improved, and we wish for better options in the security model to allow selective access for users.
CEO at TargetState4.0In my experience with iServer, I found the integration with Microsoft Office valuable and appreciated its familiar interface. However, performance issues need addressing. We have seen a return on investment, but it typically takes three to four years.
Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5No summary available
Principal Process Consultant at Process Rescue Ltd4.0No summary available
Data Governance Specialist at PSP4.5I found iServer useful for building components, mainly for its UI, which can be customized like Microsoft Office, and its flexible factory settings. However, improvements could include added reports or templates, as Spark can sometimes be overly complex.