Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
No Magic MagicDraw Logo

No Magic MagicDraw Reviews

4.2 out of 5

What is No Magic MagicDraw?

Featured No Magic MagicDraw reviews

No Magic MagicDraw mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw in the Business Process Design category stands at 2.9%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
No Magic MagicDraw2.9%
Visio11.7%
Camunda11.6%
Other73.8%
Business Process Design

PeerResearch reports based on No Magic MagicDraw reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryBusiness Process DesignSep 3, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 3, 2025Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs CamundaSep 3, 2025Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs VisioSep 3, 2025Download
ComparisonNo Magic MagicDraw vs SAP Signavio Process ManagerSep 3, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Camunda4.111.6%89%77 interviewsAdd to research
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect3.99.5%87%99 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business78
Midsize Enterprise63
Large Enterprise426
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
23%
Government
12%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
University
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
Educational Organization
3%
Retailer
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Construction Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%

Compare No Magic MagicDraw with alternative products

Learn more about No Magic MagicDraw

No Magic MagicDraw customers

Related questions

 
No Magic MagicDraw Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.0I've used No Magic MagicDraw for 25 years due to its ease of use, strong collaboration tools, and reliable support, though I wish the simulation toolkit was included by default to avoid licensing complications.
Systems Engineer at Marinha do Brasil (Oficial)4.5I used No Magic MagicDraw for modeling operations with ships and systems. Its valuable features include integration with tools like MATLAB. I found it more user-friendly and with better documentation compared to IBM Rational Rhapsody and Capella.
Systems Engineer at Marinha do Brasil (Oficial)4.5I use No Magic MagicDraw for modeling systems and find it user-friendly with extensive online documentation. However, it's quite expensive and a student trial version would be beneficial. No other solutions were considered and no cloud providers were mentioned.
Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees4.5We are piloting a model-based engineering process using MagicDraw, valuing its excellent support and user-friendly service. However, the recommendation feature could improve as we occasionally struggle to find features and require assistance.
Chief Refrigeration Product Development Division at Indurama4.5I used MagicDraw for structured refrigeration systems and appreciated its traceability feature, which provides a comprehensive view of project impacts. However, the outdated user interface, integration issues, and difficulty in finding skilled users were challenging.
SCM Build/Release Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees3.5No summary available
Director at a engineering company with 11-50 employees4.0I use No Magic MagicDraw for system architecture and simulation, particularly valuing its simulation capabilities and interface. While the solution is effective, its pricing could be more competitive. I also use PTC Integrity and Eac for different purposes.
Director, Strategy and Consulting at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees3.5No summary available