Celonis vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

Celonis and iGrafx are both solutions in the Process Mining category. Celonis is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while iGrafx is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Celonis holds a 13.5% mindshare in PM, compared to iGrafx’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Celonis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of iGrafx users who would recommend it.

Celonis

Read 60 Celonis reviews

8,910 Views
3,831 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews

2,997 Views
480 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Celonis

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and Celonis are competing products in process optimization and business transformation. Data shows that while Celonis is acclaimed for its advanced features, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform often scores higher in customer support and pricing satisfaction, suggesting better value for money.

Features: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform excels in process mapping and modeling, emphasizing compliance and governance. Key features include integration with Lean Six Sigma and DMAIC notations, the ability to simulate non-digital assets, and a comprehensive repository for workflows and documents. Celonis offers powerful real-time data analysis and process mining, with features like automated process mapping, a robust analysis matrix, and intuitive UI for business intelligence.

Room for Improvement: iGrafx can enhance its real-time data processing, expand cloud integration capabilities, and simplify its complex user interface. Celonis needs to address integration complexities, improve the accessibility of its customer service, and offer more flexible pricing options to attract budget-conscious organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: iGrafx is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, enhancing the onboarding experience. Celonis provides comprehensive implementation services, but integration challenges may arise, and while its customer service is proficient in technical issues, it may be less accessible compared to iGrafx's support.

Pricing and ROI: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is often preferred for its attractive upfront costs and satisfactory ROI, aligning well with budget-conscious needs. Celonis has a higher initial cost, justified by its analytical capabilities, which many customers see as providing strong long-term ROI. The decision often hinges on whether the analytical depth of Celonis justifies the additional investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Celonis vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,495 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Celonis

Ranking in Process Mining

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (8th)

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Ranking in Process Mining

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (16th), Business Process Management (BPM) (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 13.5%, down from 21.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 2.8%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Celonis	13.5%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform	2.8%
Other	83.7%

Process Mining

Featured Reviews

Ebin_Abraham

Data Engineer at Baker Hughes

Process mining has delivered major savings and now needs better automation and task mining

Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as strong as SaaS support. The most important area for improvement is the automation part. End-to-end automation capabilities are desired. Currently, workflows are being used, but actions should be able to go via email, task, APIs, and ultimately write back to the source. Adding RPA capability that can interact with required systems and write back to the source would greatly enhance Celonis. Task mining capabilities also require improvement. UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Process Mining have better task mining capabilities compared to Celonis. Usability and support from Celonis need improvement. They should help clients find more value in the product. Cost is another significant concern, as Celonis is very expensive compared to other process mining tools. The license cost should be reduced. Celonis should establish partnerships with clients to find more use cases and maximize the value gained from Celonis.

Read full review

Martin Rohde

Solution Consultant at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Provides documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities

If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sessions where the customers were looking for a one-time process visualization or one-time process mining, not for a long-term association with this tool. The customer's requirements are more tactical than strategic. We had some challenges during this time frame as I was with iGrafx, and electricity costs rose in Germany. One customer stopped a large deal because they had to reduce every non-invested investment due to the electricity bill rising by 500% to 800%.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides seamless unified views with awesome drill down options."

"We can observe the flow and invoices."

"We like the process mining capabilities."

"The solution offers very good division management."

"I prefer Celonis because of its user-friendliness, visualization and process comparison, spaghetti, and user reviews."

"The solution offers a very good user interface."

"Celonis is a very good tool that can improve your business process in a single package."

"I like the spaghetti it throws off when configuring the sequence of processes and tracking the endpoint. I also like the variation from these defined processes and what is being observed on the ground. I'm exploring the root cause analysis a lot these days, and it seems to be quite interesting. But again, there are a lot of external dependencies on that. But I think the spaghetti, and the one that shows the variation and the performance gap, is something which I really like."

More Celonis pros

"It's a great product, but all the functionalities need to be exploited in order to get the full value of the investment."

"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."

"Provides a valuable BPMN feature."

"We found the technical support to be helpful."

"It is very easy to use for describing processes and is very useful in the simulation of the process putting parameters and the metrics process."

"The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services."

"iGrafx gives you the capability of documenting your process and then the ability to use it as a tool for analysis to identify the loopholes and shortcomings of your process."

"The solution's most beneficial feature is the 360 approach, where documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities are in one solution."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros

Cons

"We want to see its linkage to Robotic Process Automation. We would also like to see how can it lead to the implementation side and whether the transition is smooth."

"The tool must have better process graphs."

"Another area of improvement is implementation. So, in future releases, I would like to see a more streamlined implementation process would be appreciated, making it less time-consuming and more efficient."

"Celonis needs to improve the feature channel. They should incorporate more generative AI elements into their solution."

"I have chosen a rating of eight out of ten for Celonis because of the pricing factor, and I believe much can be improved in the visualization."

"The UI could be improved."

"Celonis does not provide a detailed picture of user activities within processes because it relies on event logs from ERP systems."

"The pricing policy is not affordable in Ukraine."

More Celonis cons

"Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process."

"Visio is more user-friendly."

"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."

"There are a few areas iGrafx which could improve, probably the biggest area would be to support iOS as well as PC, so clients don’t have to emulate PC on an iOS platform."

"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."

"Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a reseller in Mexico."

"This is a tool that covers the low end (e.g. Visio) to high end (e.g. Aris), although it's much less user friendly."

"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it."

"The solution is quite expensive."

"The cost would be a concern for a certain category of customers. Flexible cost models would help smaller players be able to adapt Celonis into their business operations."

"The cost of the software for us or the client is on the higher end."

"Celonis is cost-effective."

"Celonis is a little more expensive than UiPath."

"The price could be better. If you ask a customer, they will always say it's highly-priced. In my personal opinion, the cost can be at the lower end. I think it's suitable for large organizations at this point in time."

"I was not involved in that, but I am sure it was cost-effective for them. That's why they made the decision to take it."

More Celonis pricing and cost advice

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."

"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."

"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	46

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?

I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Celonis?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iGrafx?

I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iGrafx?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iGrafx?

The solution is used for the documentation and visualization of the main processes. The customers have hundreds or thousands of processes, but they start with the top 20 processes. The next step is...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Celonis

Compared 48% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Celonis

Compared 6% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Celonis

Compared 4% of the time

More Celonis Competitors

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Celonis

June 2026

Download Celonis product report

Buyer's Guide

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

June 2026

Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report

Overview

Celonis empowers businesses with process mining, offering automation and AI features that visualize processes, identify bottlenecks, and optimize operations. With seamless integration and user-friendly tools, Celonis adds significant value to businesses aiming for operational efficiency.

Celonis is a leading tool for process mining and optimization, seamlessly connecting with SAP and Oracle systems through pre-built connectors. Its capabilities include visualizing processes, identifying inefficiencies, and optimizing workflows with comprehensive dashboards and action flows. While Celonis scores high on functionality, integration with Microsoft, Azure connectivity, and an improved pricing model are areas for improvement. Training resources and an intuitive interface are essential for users managing frequent updates and complex programming needs. With robust process analysis and automation features, Celonis enhances decision-making and resource allocation.

What key features does Celonis offer?

Process Mining: Visualizes and analyzes business processes to identify inefficiencies.
Automation: Enables streamlined, automated workflows for improved productivity.
AI Capabilities: Enhances process optimization and decision-making with advanced AI.
Integration: Offers pre-built connectors for seamless integration with SAP and Oracle.
Dashboards: Provides comprehensive views of operations to monitor performance.

What benefits or ROI should reviewers look for?

Operational Efficiency: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks, improving workflows.
Resource Optimization: Enables better allocation and utilization of resources.
Informed Decisions: Data-driven insights support strategic decision-making.
Cost Management: Streamlines processes, reducing operational costs.

In finance, procurement, and supply chain, Celonis is utilized to monitor and optimize entire business processes, analyzing data from systems like SAP and Oracle to uncover inefficiencies. Organizations leverage its process analysis and automation triggers for improved performance and resource allocation.

Celonis

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform integrates IDEF0, supports Lean Six Sigma, and offers comprehensive process modeling, making it a versatile choice for industry-specific needs including risk assessment and enterprise object usage.

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is known for its capabilities in streamlining workflows, process mining, and scenario simulation. While it simplifies the complexities of BPMN, and provides powerful tools for workflow plotting, documentation, and simulation, it faces challenges in ease of linking with new ERP systems, web modeling complexity, and costs. The platform offers predefined templates for easy process creation, yet it lacks depth in reporting tools and has limited multi-language support which could be improved for broader usability.

What are the key features of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

IDEF0 Integration: Simplifies process analysis using structured graphical representation.
Lean Six Sigma Support: Enhances efficiency and quality management through integration with Six Sigma methodologies.
Process Simulation: Enables scenario testing to optimize workflows.
BPMN Capabilities: Provides tools for clear representation of business workflows.
KPI Integration: Monitors key performance indicators for continuous improvement.
Collaboration Features: Facilitates teamwork and collaboration during process development.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

Streamlined Workflows: Efficiently manages and optimizes business processes.
Robust Analysis: Offers deep insights into process performance for decision-making.
Process Mining: Identifies inefficiencies and potential improvements within workflows.
Versatile Application: Suitable for industries like banking and service modeling.

Many industries utilize iGrafx Process360 Live Platform for business process modeling, analysis, and management. It is extensively applied in banking for risk assessment, utilizing its BPM capabilities to adhere to ISO 9000 standards. Service-oriented companies use its process design and repository functions for effective process mining and management, making it a valuable tool in managing complex organizational structures.

iGrafx

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool

Multinational Bank

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

June 2026

Free Report: Celonis vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Celonis vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

See our list of best Process Mining vendors.

We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.