Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nintex Process Platform vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

iGrafx and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. iGrafx is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.3, while Nintex is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. iGrafx holds a 0.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of iGrafx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.
iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...
Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews
  • 1,258 Views
  • 767 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
Nintex Process Platform
Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews
  • 2,521 Views
  • 1,941 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform compete in the process management solutions space. Nintex leads in customer support and pricing satisfaction, while iGrafx boasts a superior feature set that justifies its higher costs.

Features: Nintex Process Platform offers effective workflow automation and document generation, seamless Microsoft platform integration, and simple user interfaces. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides robust process modeling, simulation capabilities, and advanced business process analysis, along with integration of KPIs and process optimization.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance scalability, expand advanced analytics capabilities, and provide more comprehensive documentation resources. iGrafx may focus on simplifying deployment processes, offering more flexible pricing options, and improving its user interface for novices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex features an intuitive deployment experience and responsive customer service, making integration straightforward for Microsoft users. iGrafx, while offering complex deployment due to advanced features, ensures effective guidance and support during installation.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex offers flexible pricing with strong ROI for Microsoft-dependent organizations through lower setup costs and fast deployment. iGrafx requires higher initial investment but its extensive features can yield significant ROI over time, especially for advanced process analysis needs.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 866,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
24th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (16th), Process Mining (9th)
Nintex Process Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (11th), Workload Automation (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.1%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Nintex Process Platform2.1%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform0.9%
Other97.0%
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

SangameshwarKadole - PeerSpot reviewer
A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining
The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings. The web modeling part can be a bit complex or difficult for new users of the solution. Simplifying the look and feel to make the web modeling part easy to use can greatly improve iGrafx.
Read full review
Satya Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability
Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution. And in that case, you are looking for some custom development. And it's a little bit difficult in the Nintex area. Because they are totally dependent on the low-code solution, and you are looking at where you can implement your custom things. However, you can do that thing, but that will be a difficult task. Also, the outcome, whatever you are trying to get from such kind of custom development, will be a little bit difficult. Let's suppose, like, if you are working with a medium level of data or a small level of data that will be easier to handle with the Nintex. However, the bulk data on a high level of data would be difficult. I have been working with Nintex for the past three years. I've been able to create some really good products in different domains, including banking and insurance. Everything seems achievable, but there are a few things I'm missing. First, debugging can be a bit difficult in Nintex. You can't debug forms and workflows easily. This is something that could be improved in future releases. It requires some R&D. Second, I would like to see more integration with AI. There is some custom integration available through the gateway, but it would be great to have more AI-related features built into the platform.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."
"The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services."
"Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"iGrafx gives you the capability of documenting your process and then the ability to use it as a tool for analysis to identify the loopholes and shortcomings of your process."
"Simulation is most valuable."
"Web diagramming and RACI have helped expedite the process, capture, and ownership initiatives of our organization."
"One of the biggest plus points of the product stems from the fact that I have never seen any glitches in it."
More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"The capacity to integrate with external platforms. It's great to be able to call web services or other external services."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
More Nintex Process Platform pros
 

Cons

"The solution could benefit from improvements to its interface. More specifically, when compared to other tools, the process modeling features lack symbols or object types that are used to represent the information or data within the process."
"The price could be more competitive."
"I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping."
"One of the areas in the product with certain shortcomings where improvements are required includes the tool's reporting capabilities."
"If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right."
"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."
"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."
"With iGrafx, the implementation and the licensing were pretty complex."
More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
More Nintex Process Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."
"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."
"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."
"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."
"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."
"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."
"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."
"The annual support costs are expensive."
"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."
"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."
"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."
"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."
"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."
More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
866,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Non Profit
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Educational Organization
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise24
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about iGrafx?
The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iGrafx?
I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with iGrafx?
If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sess...
See all answers
What do you like most about K2?
The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?
Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.
See all answers
What needs improvement with K2?
The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
Compared 18% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
Compared 13% of the time
Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
Compared 12% of the time
Lucidchart vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Lucidchart vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Logo
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
Compared 7% of the time
More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors
Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 15% of the time
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 8% of the time
ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
ServiceNow Orchestration vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform Logo
Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More Nintex Process Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
August 2025
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reportDownload iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform
August 2025
Nintex Process Platform reportDownload Nintex Process Platform product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
 

Overview

The iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is a comprehensive software platform tailored for organizations undergoing digital transformation. Its core functionalities include process mining, process design, simulation, predictive analytics, and AI-based automation. By leveraging these tools, businesses can gain valuable insights into their processes, streamline design and optimization efforts, and harness automation for enhanced efficiency. Whether analyzing existing processes, visually modeling workflows, simulating potential changes, or employing predictive analytics, Process360 Live facilitates a seamless journey towards process intelligence and management, pivotal for modern businesses aiming for operational excellence.

iGrafx

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?
  • No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
  • System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
  • Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
  • SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
  • Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.
What benefits and ROI should users expect?
  • Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
  • Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
  • Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex
 

Sample Customers

Multinational Bank
SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
Buyer's Guide
Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
July 2025
Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
866,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.