Nintex Process Platform vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

iGrafx and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. iGrafx is ranked #32, while Nintex is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.3. iGrafx holds a 1.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of iGrafx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews

3,411 Views
2,319 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

6,699 Views
4,086 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform compete in the process management solutions space. Nintex leads in customer support and pricing satisfaction, while iGrafx boasts a superior feature set that justifies its higher costs.

Features: Nintex Process Platform offers effective workflow automation and document generation, seamless Microsoft platform integration, and simple user interfaces. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides robust process modeling, simulation capabilities, and advanced business process analysis, along with integration of KPIs and process optimization.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance scalability, expand advanced analytics capabilities, and provide more comprehensive documentation resources. iGrafx may focus on simplifying deployment processes, offering more flexible pricing options, and improving its user interface for novices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex features an intuitive deployment experience and responsive customer service, making integration straightforward for Microsoft users. iGrafx, while offering complex deployment due to advanced features, ensures effective guidance and support during installation.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex offers flexible pricing with strong ROI for Microsoft-dependent organizations through lower setup costs and fast deployment. iGrafx requires higher initial investment but its extensive features can yield significant ROI over time, especially for advanced process analysis needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (19th), Process Mining (17th)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (18th), Workload Automation (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.8%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform	1.2%
Other	97.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Martin Rohde

Solution Consultant at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Provides documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities

If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sessions where the customers were looking for a one-time process visualization or one-time process mining, not for a long-term association with this tool. The customer's requirements are more tactical than strategic. We had some challenges during this time frame as I was with iGrafx, and electricity costs rose in Germany. One customer stopped a large deal because they had to reduce every non-invested investment due to the electricity bill rising by 500% to 800%.

Read full review

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."

"One of the biggest plus points of the product stems from the fact that I have never seen any glitches in it."

"We found the technical support to be helpful."

"It is very easy to use for describing processes and is very useful in the simulation of the process putting parameters and the metrics process."

"Provides a valuable BPMN feature."

"The solution has helped our organization because instead of writing long documentation for the shop floor, flow charts make it more attractive for the staff to follow up on and carry out procedures."

"It is one of the top-tier solutions that are available."

"The solution's most beneficial feature is the 360 approach, where documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities are in one solution."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros

"Scalability, good performance, and the K2 designer to create workflows/screens are the most valuable features."

"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

"We contacted the technical support team a couple of times last year."

"From our perspective, you can save at least thirty percent in terms of time spent on manual processes, and documenting approvals and process flows."

"The capacity to integrate with external platforms. It's great to be able to call web services or other external services."

"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."

"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."

"The product's primary advantage is its low-code nature which allows for rapid development without extensive coding."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"The price could be more competitive."

"If the price of the solution was more competitive, it would have made things easier for our company to extend the usage."

"Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process."

"Visio is more user-friendly."

"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."

"Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a reseller in Mexico."

"It can be more user-friendly."

"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

"We cannot use the same solution on cloud, and we have to purchase it all over again to get it on cloud."

"Technical support is not so good, i.e., you should have a good contact inside the company, because the service desk is not that efficient."

"We had issues with long-running workflows for approval processes."

"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."

"I have used Pega and I feel that it offers more than the K2 solution, in terms of the latest technology."

"At times, issues arise in certain scenarios. In such cases, the versioning can become quite difficult. There may be no other way but to restart the entire process or rectify it at that point."

"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."

"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."

"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iGrafx?

I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iGrafx?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iGrafx?

The solution is used for the documentation and visualization of the main processes. The customers have hundreds or thousands of processes, but they start with the top 20 processes. The next step is...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

July 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform integrates IDEF0, supports Lean Six Sigma, and offers comprehensive process modeling, making it a versatile choice for industry-specific needs including risk assessment and enterprise object usage.

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is known for its capabilities in streamlining workflows, process mining, and scenario simulation. While it simplifies the complexities of BPMN, and provides powerful tools for workflow plotting, documentation, and simulation, it faces challenges in ease of linking with new ERP systems, web modeling complexity, and costs. The platform offers predefined templates for easy process creation, yet it lacks depth in reporting tools and has limited multi-language support which could be improved for broader usability.

What are the key features of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

IDEF0 Integration: Simplifies process analysis using structured graphical representation.
Lean Six Sigma Support: Enhances efficiency and quality management through integration with Six Sigma methodologies.
Process Simulation: Enables scenario testing to optimize workflows.
BPMN Capabilities: Provides tools for clear representation of business workflows.
KPI Integration: Monitors key performance indicators for continuous improvement.
Collaboration Features: Facilitates teamwork and collaboration during process development.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

Streamlined Workflows: Efficiently manages and optimizes business processes.
Robust Analysis: Offers deep insights into process performance for decision-making.
Process Mining: Identifies inefficiencies and potential improvements within workflows.
Versatile Application: Suitable for industries like banking and service modeling.

Many industries utilize iGrafx Process360 Live Platform for business process modeling, analysis, and management. It is extensively applied in banking for risk assessment, utilizing its BPM capabilities to adhere to ISO 9000 standards. Service-oriented companies use its process design and repository functions for effective process mining and management, making it a valuable tool in managing complex organizational structures.

iGrafx

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Multinational Bank

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.