Nintex Process Platform vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

iGrafx and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. iGrafx is ranked #30, while Nintex is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.5. iGrafx holds a 1.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of iGrafx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews

4,320 Views
2,981 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

8,615 Views
5,169 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform compete in the process management solutions space. Nintex leads in customer support and pricing satisfaction, while iGrafx boasts a superior feature set that justifies its higher costs.

Features: Nintex Process Platform offers effective workflow automation and document generation, seamless Microsoft platform integration, and simple user interfaces. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides robust process modeling, simulation capabilities, and advanced business process analysis, along with integration of KPIs and process optimization.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance scalability, expand advanced analytics capabilities, and provide more comprehensive documentation resources. iGrafx may focus on simplifying deployment processes, offering more flexible pricing options, and improving its user interface for novices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex features an intuitive deployment experience and responsive customer service, making integration straightforward for Microsoft users. iGrafx, while offering complex deployment due to advanced features, ensures effective guidance and support during installation.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex offers flexible pricing with strong ROI for Microsoft-dependent organizations through lower setup costs and fast deployment. iGrafx requires higher initial investment but its extensive features can yield significant ROI over time, especially for advanced process analysis needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

30th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (18th), Process Mining (17th)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (16th), Workload Automation (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.8%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform	1.2%
Other	97.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Martin Rohde

Solution Consultant at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Provides documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities

If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sessions where the customers were looking for a one-time process visualization or one-time process mining, not for a long-term association with this tool. The customer's requirements are more tactical than strategic. We had some challenges during this time frame as I was with iGrafx, and electricity costs rose in Germany. One customer stopped a large deal because they had to reduce every non-invested investment due to the electricity bill rising by 500% to 800%.

Read full review

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the biggest plus points of the product stems from the fact that I have never seen any glitches in it."

"Simulation is most valuable."

"iGrafx is the most comprehensive way to have all the cross-feeds and the documents related to workflows, like cross-notes."

"The solution has helped our organization because instead of writing long documentation for the shop floor, flow charts make it more attractive for the staff to follow up on and carry out procedures."

"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."

"If you need software to help you easily design processes, make simulations, build value stream mappings, which has some LEAN features, and DMAIC support, I strongly encourage you to go forward and buy iGrafx."

"It is one of the top-tier solutions that are available."

"It has increased accountability by providing defined documentation ownership."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros

"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."

"In some instances, workflows I’ve built for customers have transformed the business, saving significant time and costs compared to manual, legacy processes."

"We contacted the technical support team a couple of times last year."

"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."

"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding, and because it's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with, it was easy to adapt the application in our environment."

"This is a very good solution, and our client is very happy with it."

"It's easy to learn. However, there is very little content available for the Nintex also, but they are providing their own documentation and all. So, it's easy to learn also."

"The technical support is very good."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"It can be more user-friendly."

"If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right."

"Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a reseller in Mexico."

"Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process."

"This is a tool that covers the low end (e.g. Visio) to high end (e.g. Aris), although it's much less user friendly."

"The solution could benefit from improvements to its interface. More specifically, when compared to other tools, the process modeling features lack symbols or object types that are used to represent the information or data within the process."

"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."

"There are a few areas iGrafx which could improve, probably the biggest area would be to support iOS as well as PC, so clients don’t have to emulate PC on an iOS platform."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."

"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."

"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement."

"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."

"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."

"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."

"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"Nintex Workflow is more expensive than Microsoft's native products, but it is still considered moderately priced when compared to higher-end products such as K2."

"This solution is affordable and is cheaper than most alternatives on the market. We have a standard cloud license that costs about 20k per year."

"The annual support costs are expensive."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

October 2026

Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

October 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform integrates IDEF0, supports Lean Six Sigma, and offers comprehensive process modeling, making it a versatile choice for industry-specific needs including risk assessment and enterprise object usage.

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is known for its capabilities in streamlining workflows, process mining, and scenario simulation. While it simplifies the complexities of BPMN, and provides powerful tools for workflow plotting, documentation, and simulation, it faces challenges in ease of linking with new ERP systems, web modeling complexity, and costs. The platform offers predefined templates for easy process creation, yet it lacks depth in reporting tools and has limited multi-language support which could be improved for broader usability.

What are the key features of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

IDEF0 Integration: Simplifies process analysis using structured graphical representation.
Lean Six Sigma Support: Enhances efficiency and quality management through integration with Six Sigma methodologies.
Process Simulation: Enables scenario testing to optimize workflows.
BPMN Capabilities: Provides tools for clear representation of business workflows.
KPI Integration: Monitors key performance indicators for continuous improvement.
Collaboration Features: Facilitates teamwork and collaboration during process development.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

Streamlined Workflows: Efficiently manages and optimizes business processes.
Robust Analysis: Offers deep insights into process performance for decision-making.
Process Mining: Identifies inefficiencies and potential improvements within workflows.
Versatile Application: Suitable for industries like banking and service modeling.

Many industries utilize iGrafx Process360 Live Platform for business process modeling, analysis, and management. It is extensively applied in banking for risk assessment, utilizing its BPM capabilities to adhere to ISO 9000 standards. Service-oriented companies use its process design and repository functions for effective process mining and management, making it a valuable tool in managing complex organizational structures.

iGrafx

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Multinational Bank

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

November 2026

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.