Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
N2W Logo

Top 10 N2W Alternatives

Vendor: N2WS
4.7 out of 5
Leave a review

Top N2W Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to N2W based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Commvault Cloud, and Rubrik. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. N2W surpasses its competitors by offering robust data protection and efficient backup solutions, ensuring seamless disaster recovery and unparalleled scalability, empowering businesses to safeguard critical information seamlessly across multiple cloud platforms.

N2WS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with N2WS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
N2W focuses on AWS cloud environments with its AWS-native backup capabilities, appealing to users seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform supports diverse environments with advanced features, attracting those needing comprehensive protection and management across varied IT ecosystems.
Download N2W vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
N2W offers a low initial setup cost, providing cost-effective cloud backup, while Veeam Data Platform, with a higher setup cost, delivers comprehensive data management features for enterprise environments, highlighting a balance between affordability and advanced functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W offers a low initial setup cost, providing cost-effective cloud backup, while Veeam Data Platform, with a higher setup cost, delivers comprehensive data management features for enterprise environments, highlighting a balance between affordability and advanced functionalities.
N2W Logo
Commvault Cloud
4.3 out of 5
N2W Logo
Commvault Cloud
4.3 out of 5
Commvault Cloud supports broad cloud environments with robust backup and recovery features, ideal for those needing comprehensive management across hybrid setups. In comparison, N2W excels with AWS-centric backup solutions, offering intuitive automation and lifecycle management specifically for AWS workloads.
Download Commvault Cloud vs. N2W Report
Commvault Cloud's setup cost is higher but offers comprehensive features, while N2W has a lower setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution with basic functions.
View comparison
Pricing
Commvault Cloud's setup cost is higher but offers comprehensive features, while N2W has a lower setup cost, providing a cost-effective solution with basic functions.
N2W Logo
Rubrik
4.5 out of 5
N2W Logo
Rubrik
4.5 out of 5
Rubrik offers powerful disaster recovery features, enhancing operational efficiency. In comparison, N2W excels in AWS service integration. While Rubrik focuses on on-prem environments, N2W optimizes AWS public cloud management, catering to different organizational needs.
Download N2W vs. Rubrik Report
Rubrik has a higher setup cost compared to N2W, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Rubrik has a higher setup cost compared to N2W, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
N2W Logo
HPE Zerto Software
4.5 out of 5
N2W Logo
HPE Zerto Software
4.5 out of 5
HPE Zerto Software excels in advanced disaster recovery with robust cloud integration and rapid recovery, appealing to enterprises needing stringent protection. In comparison, N2W specializes in AWS environments, offering cost-effective backup solutions with seamless AWS integration and efficient cloud-native recovery options.
Download HPE Zerto Software vs. N2W Report
The setup cost for HPE Zerto Software is noted for its efficiency, while N2W is praised for its affordability, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence initial purchasing decisions between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for HPE Zerto Software is noted for its efficiency, while N2W is praised for its affordability, highlighting a significant cost difference that may influence initial purchasing decisions between the two solutions.
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365
4.0 out of 5
Veeam Data Cloud offers detailed recoveries for Microsoft 365, appealing to users with granular restore needs. In comparison, N2W excels in AWS environments, providing policy-based automation and cross-region disaster recovery, ideal for users prioritizing AWS infrastructure protection.
Download N2W vs. Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 Report
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, whereas N2W requires an initial setup fee, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Veeam Data Cloud users when considering initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 offers a straightforward setup without additional costs, whereas N2W requires an initial setup fee, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for Veeam Data Cloud users when considering initial expenses.
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
Cohesity DataProtect
4.5 out of 5
Cohesity DataProtect offers instant recovery, VM restores, and a user-friendly dashboard for comprehensive backup needs. In comparison, N2WS excels in AWS environments with policy-based automation and EC2/RDS instance backups, providing cost efficiency for AWS-hosted workloads.
Download Cohesity DataProtect vs. N2W Report
Cohesity DataProtect has a higher setup cost compared to N2W. N2W offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Cohesity DataProtect has a higher setup cost compared to N2W. N2W offers a more affordable initial setup.
N2W Logo
Nasuni
4.4 out of 5
N2W Logo
Nasuni
4.4 out of 5
Nasuni is ideal for enterprises needing centralized file management with features like global file locking and multi-cloud deployment. In comparison, N2W caters to AWS users with cost-effective backup solutions, offering automated scheduling and cross-region disaster recovery, making it suitable for AWS-heavy environments.
Download N2W vs. Nasuni Report
Nasuni typically has higher setup costs compared to N2W, making N2W more attractive for budget-conscious users seeking lower initial financial commitments.
View comparison
Pricing
Nasuni typically has higher setup costs compared to N2W, making N2W more attractive for budget-conscious users seeking lower initial financial commitments.
N2W Logo
AWS Backup
4.0 out of 5
N2W Logo
AWS Backup
4.0 out of 5
N2W excels in pricing and customer support, making it ideal for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, AWS Backup offers extensive features with a broader range of services, appealing to those valuing comprehensive data protection and willing to invest for quality and integration within AWS's ecosystem.
Download AWS Backup vs. N2W Report
N2W offers a straightforward setup cost, appealing for small to medium-sized enterprises, while AWS Backup presents a more scalable pricing structure, suitable for larger organizations seeking flexible payment plans.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W offers a straightforward setup cost, appealing for small to medium-sized enterprises, while AWS Backup presents a more scalable pricing structure, suitable for larger organizations seeking flexible payment plans.
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
4.7 out of 5

NAKIVO Backup & Replication provides VM-level features and versatile OS compatibility. In comparison, N2W excels in AWS integration and automation. NAKIVO's cost-effective model suits SMEs, while N2W's AWS Marketplace alignment offers flexibility. NAKIVO integrates well on-premise, whereas N2W simplifies AWS cloud environments.

Download N2W vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report
NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a lower setup cost, while N2W emphasizes flexible pricing. The contrast in setup costs highlights differing approaches to pricing strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a lower setup cost, while N2W emphasizes flexible pricing. The contrast in setup costs highlights differing approaches to pricing strategy.
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
3.9 out of 5
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery excels in native integration and continuous data protection, ideal for AWS environments. In comparison, N2W offers robust reporting and cross-region recovery, appealing to those needing advanced disaster recovery. AWS provides managed scalability, whereas N2W prioritizes cost efficiency and flexible backup management.
Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. N2W Report
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery incurs minimal setup costs, offering an economical entry, while N2W presents a more substantial initial investment. This difference highlights AWS's affordability advantage over N2W in terms of upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery incurs minimal setup costs, offering an economical entry, while N2W presents a more substantial initial investment. This difference highlights AWS's affordability advantage over N2W in terms of upfront expenses.
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
4.3 out of 5
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup is valued for simplicity and affordability, offering multi-hypervisor support. In comparison, N2WS focuses on advanced features and AWS optimization, making it suitable for users seeking comprehensive cloud-specific capabilities with seamless AWS integration.
Download Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs. N2W Report
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup has a straightforward setup cost, whereas N2W demands a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup has a straightforward setup cost, whereas N2W demands a higher initial investment.
N2W Logo
Carbonite Server
4.1 out of 5
N2W Logo
Carbonite Server
4.1 out of 5
Carbonite Server offers comprehensive data protection with automated backups and secure encryption, appealing to businesses with diverse recovery needs. In comparison, N2W excels in cloud-native features like AWS snapshot management, attracting cloud-centric enterprises seeking advanced options and flexibility within cloud environments.
Download Carbonite Server vs. N2W Report
Carbonite Server incurs a higher initial cost due to its complex setup, while N2W offers a simpler and more budget-friendly installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Carbonite Server incurs a higher initial cost due to its complex setup, while N2W offers a simpler and more budget-friendly installation process.
N2W Logo
NetVault Plus
3.6 out of 5
N2W Logo
NetVault Plus
3.6 out of 5
N2W attracts businesses with its user-friendly interface and AWS integration for effective cloud optimization. In comparison, NetVault Plus provides extensive database support and advanced recovery, appealing to enterprises with complex needs. N2W's cost-effectiveness suits smaller businesses, whereas NetVault Plus promises high ROI for larger enterprises.
Download N2W vs. NetVault Plus Report
N2W offers a more cost-effective setup with straightforward pricing, while NetVault Plus requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W offers a more cost-effective setup with straightforward pricing, while NetVault Plus requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and scalability.
N2W Logo
MSP360 Backup
4.0 out of 5
N2W Logo
MSP360 Backup
4.0 out of 5
MSP360 Backup offers strong cross-platform flexibility and competitive pricing appealing to diverse IT environments. In comparison, N2W integrates seamlessly with AWS, offering advanced recovery options and cloud-centric support. Tech buyers might choose MSP360 for affordability, while favoring N2W for AWS-specific needs.
Download MSP360 Backup vs. N2W Report
MSP360 Backup has a setup cost that is straightforward and competitive, while N2W offers a more flexible pricing structure, highlighting cost differences in managing backups.
View comparison
Pricing
MSP360 Backup has a setup cost that is straightforward and competitive, while N2W offers a more flexible pricing structure, highlighting cost differences in managing backups.
N2W Logo
Quorum OnQ
4.5 out of 5
N2W Logo
Quorum OnQ
4.5 out of 5
N2W offers an agentless, cloud-native architecture with strong AWS backup capabilities. In comparison, Quorum OnQ provides comprehensive data protection and instant recovery for diverse IT environments. N2W benefits from cost-efficiency, while Quorum OnQ offers broader operational flexibility and advanced recovery features.
Download N2W vs. Quorum OnQ Report
N2W setup costs are competitive, while Quorum OnQ involves higher initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W setup costs are competitive, while Quorum OnQ involves higher initial fees.
N2W Logo
Clumio
4.8 out of 5
N2W Logo
Clumio
4.8 out of 5
N2W offers cost-effective backup scheduling and disaster recovery, ideal for AWS users. In comparison, Clumio's advanced compliance and protection features justify its premium price for those prioritizing comprehensive security, making it suitable for businesses seeking extensive data management and willing to invest long-term.
Download Clumio vs. N2W Report
N2W offers a lower setup cost, while Clumio's initial setup is higher, reflecting a potential trade-off between upfront expenses and features integrated into their pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W offers a lower setup cost, while Clumio's initial setup is higher, reflecting a potential trade-off between upfront expenses and features integrated into their pricing structure.
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
Datto Cloud Continuity
4.0 out of 5
Datto Cloud Continuity excels in ease of integration and quick setup, ideal for small to medium businesses. In comparison, N2W, with its robust features and flexibility in managing complex cloud architectures, is suitable for enterprises needing advanced AWS environment solutions despite higher pricing.
Download Datto Cloud Continuity vs. N2W Report
Datto Cloud Continuity has a higher setup cost compared to N2W, making N2W the more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Both solutions vary in pricing, reflecting different cost considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
Datto Cloud Continuity has a higher setup cost compared to N2W, making N2W the more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Both solutions vary in pricing, reflecting different cost considerations.
N2W Logo
NetApp SnapCenter
4.0 out of 5
N2W Logo
NetApp SnapCenter
4.0 out of 5
N2W appeals to tech buyers with cost-effective pricing and efficient cloud operations. In comparison, NetApp SnapCenter attracts those seeking extensive features and integration capabilities, despite higher initial costs. N2W's simplicity contrasts with the feature-rich setup of a NetApp SnapCenter environment.
Download N2W vs. NetApp SnapCenter Report
N2W offers a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while NetApp SnapCenter may involve higher upfront expenses due to its complex integration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W offers a lower setup cost with straightforward implementation, while NetApp SnapCenter may involve higher upfront expenses due to its complex integration requirements.
N2W Logo
Druva Phoenix
4.3 out of 5
N2W Logo
Druva Phoenix
4.3 out of 5
N2W excels in AWS environments with cost-efficient disaster recovery features, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Druva Phoenix offers expansive data management and cloud-native deployment, attracting enterprises needing integrated data protection across platforms. Pricing varies, influencing the choice based on specific requirements.
Download Druva Phoenix vs. N2W Report
N2W offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Druva Phoenix requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Druva Phoenix requires a higher initial investment.
N2W Logo
Eon.io
1 out of 5
N2W Logo
Eon.io
1 out of 5
N2W's edge lies in cost-effectiveness and seamless AWS integration, appealing to organizations prioritizing budget and ease of use. In comparison, Eon.io's multi-cloud capabilities and extensive configurability attract buyers needing detailed customization and higher functionality despite a higher upfront investment.
N2W has a minimal setup cost, while Eon.io requires a higher initial expenditure. The difference in setup costs is a significant factor between the two services.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W has a minimal setup cost, while Eon.io requires a higher initial expenditure. The difference in setup costs is a significant factor between the two services.
N2W Logo
N2W Logo
Arcserve Cloud Direct
2.5 out of 5
N2W attracts businesses prioritizing AWS, excelling in AWS-native integration and rapid recovery for EC2 and RDS. In comparison, Arcserve Cloud Direct offers multi-cloud versatility and extensive recovery options suitable for complex environments, appealing to those needing broader platform support.
N2W has no setup cost, while Arcserve Cloud Direct requires a setup fee, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
N2W has no setup cost, while Arcserve Cloud Direct requires a setup fee, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses between the two solutions.

Related categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
Backup and Recovery
Cloud Backup