Acronis Cyber Protect vs N2W comparison

Acronis Cyber Protect and N2W compete in providing comprehensive data protection solutions. Acronis seems to have an upper hand due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities across various platforms.

Features: Acronis Cyber Protect offers universal restore, live boot restore, and secure zone backups, making it compatible with many operating systems. It also integrates cybersecurity features to protect against malware and ransomware. N2W focuses on AWS, providing efficient solutions for cloud backups, especially for EC2 instances, with simplicity for AWS service users.

Room for Improvement: Acronis Cyber Protect faces challenges with complex setup and system resource consumption. Users have reported backward compatibility issues and delays in support. It also requires enhanced support for various storage options. N2W needs improvement in supporting on-premises environments efficiently, with some features not as strong as its cloud capabilities. Cost reductions and improved user interfaces could benefit both.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acronis Cyber Protect provides broad deployment options across hybrid cloud environments. However, its customer service can be inconsistent, with slow response times reported. N2W, while offering easy deployment in cloud environments, lacks in-depth technical support outside AWS, needing improvements in service accessibility.

Pricing and ROI: Acronis Cyber Protect has flexible licensing but is more expensive compared to competitors. Its robust features justify the cost by providing significant ROI. N2W offers competitive pricing for AWS-centric models, making it ideal for AWS-heavy environments. Pricing practicality hinges on organizational infrastructure needs and the balance between cloud and on-premises deployments.