N2W vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

N2WS and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. N2WS is ranked #41 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. N2WS holds a 0.3% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N2WS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

N2W

Read 8 N2W reviews

737 Views
398 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,596 Views
1,325 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

N2W

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 3, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and N2W are backup solutions competing in cloud and enterprise environments. N2W appears to have the upper hand regarding ease of use and pricing flexibility, particularly for AWS environments, while OpenText Data Protector is favored for its comprehensive support and platform compatibility.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers extensive integration capabilities with SAP, Oracle, Exchange, and VMware, allowing disaster recovery and advanced deduplication features. Its reliability and detailed reporting are highly valued. N2W is known for ease of use, fast backup processes, and affordability, focusing on AWS workload management, making it attractive for cloud-centric users.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector requires a modernized interface, improved documentation, and streamlined license management. Its GUI is outdated, and technical support can be slow. Enhancements in Hyper-V and VMware integration are needed. N2W should improve efficiency for on-premise server backups and expand cloud capabilities to match competitors.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector is suitable for on-premises and hybrid environments but less optimal for cloud deployments compared to N2W, which excels in public cloud environments like AWS. OpenText's support has mixed reviews, with N2W's support generally rated higher for being faster and more reliable, despite lacking multilingual support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector's pricing can be high, especially with advanced features and comprehensive deployments, though various licensing options are available. N2W is praised for competitive pricing through AWS Marketplace, offering elastic options that allow scalability without significant cost spikes, benefitting cloud-focused organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N2W

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

41st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (33rd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (24th), AWS Marketplace (36th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of N2W is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Hitesh Jethwa

Solutions Architect at Newera Informatique pvt.ltd

User-friendly, easy to deploy, and stable

I give the solution a nine out of ten. We require one engineer for maintenance. I would highly recommend N2WS Backup & Recovery, as I have had no issues and the sales and technical support teams have been excellent. They keep in touch with us every three to six months via email and phone calls.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is easy."

"The product is successful with the SMB market."

"N2WS Backup & Recovery is very easy to use and configure backup for AWS instances."

"The backup and recovery are the most valuable features. So, our developers can work with confidence."

"The recovery time is fantastic and proven. Also, by providing a simple interface, the solution lowers the cost."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."

"The backup and restore functionality is very easy to use and manage."

"Provides easy, one-click functionality and flexible backup policies and schedules for AWS workloads."

"What we find most valuable in Micro Focus Data Protector is that it provides Japanese data protection, for example, it protects information such as the full Japanese name, address, etc."

"The most valuable feature of Data Protector is its integration with VMware. A lot of software these days integrates with VMware, and you can run some of these things on virtual machines. You can even have your backup manager running on a virtual machine and use physical managers to move data around. Their VMware integration isn't too bad, but Commvault has that feature, and many other backup products do."

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The stability of the product seems to be quite good."

"It's user-friendly and not overly complicated to configure."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"Additional features I would like to see are the ability to restore to different vendors, AWS and Azure, and/or the ability or take the information out of the AWS cloud."

"The GUI has room for improvement."

"There is room for improvement in stability."

"The GUI could be slightly improved."

"The UI is a little dated and hard to use. Some of the buttons are a bit small. You have to go into the menu to get the settings you want."

"It's a global feature that the customer thinks they don't have enough tools to manage, to copy, to delay, and to classify the object file in the backup directory. So they need more tools to manage files in object directory."

"The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient."

"More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios."

"It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates."

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

"Micro Focus are improving Data Protector with every new version and since we began undergoing training with the latest version we have not faced any real challenges yet. However, their support does need to be improved, in my opinion. In certain critical cases that we've had, they did not provide a satisfactory level of support."

"Other tools seem to be easier to use."

"We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas."

"We're not satisfied with the robustness and stability of the software since Micro Focus took it in-house. The GUI is one thing they could improve. It's still a bit archaic. Data Protector needs a more functional, user-friendly GUI."

"The interface has been the same for many years and needs to be updated"

"Virtualization."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about N2WS Backup & Recovery?

N2WS Backup & Recovery is very easy to use and configure backup for AWS instances.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

N2WS Backup & Recovery efficiently takes cloud backups on EC2 instances. The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

We use N2WS Backup & Recovery for backing up EC2 instances.

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs N2W

Compared 20% of the time

AWS Backup vs N2W

Compared 18% of the time

Clumio vs N2W

Compared 12% of the time

Rubrik vs N2W

Compared 11% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs N2W

Compared 10% of the time

More N2W Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 49% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

August 2025

Download N2W product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

August 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

N2WS Backup & Recovery, N2WS Cloud Protection Manager, N2W Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial/BYOL

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Interactive Demo

N2WS

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

N2W provides a cloud-native platform for AWS and Azure environments, delivering rapid and secure backup and recovery. With its simplicity and efficiency, N2W addresses modern IT needs for managing diverse workloads.

N2W empowers IT teams with a platform built for real-world AWS and Azure demands. It allows effortless scaling, managing workloads ranging from a single app to thousands. Offering policy-based backups, it ensures rapid recovery, achieving operations under 60 seconds. Its features include ransomware protection, smart data management, seamless low-cost archival, and comprehensive reporting. Trusted by over 1,000 diverse organizations, N2W simplifies protection and reduces complexity.

What features make N2W stand out?

Ridiculously easy to use: Intuitive interface enhances efficiency.
Seriously fast to recover: Recovers data swiftly, reducing downtime.
Highly secure: Built-in security gives users peace of mind.
Immutable backups: Protects against ransomware effectively.
Smart data lifecycle management: Ensures cost efficiency through smart strategies.

What benefits and ROI make N2W attractive?

Time efficiency: Quick recovery minimizes downtime.
Cost savings: Effective data management reduces expenses.
Scalability: Adapts to diverse workload sizes seamlessly.
Reliability: Provides a dependable backup repository.
Security: Networking safeguards enhance data protection.

N2W serves a range of industries by backing up EC2 instances, RDS, virtual machines, and applications like SQL. It supports disaster recovery through automated backup scheduling and integrates cloud repositories for added security. Often used with Veeam, N2W provides an offsite copy for redundancy.

N2WS

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Deloitte, NASA, Johnson & Johnson, Dyson, Deuthsche Bahn, Skechers, Allan Gray, Hewlett Packard, St. John's University, City of Oakland

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

July 2025

Free Report: N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.