N2W vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

N2WS and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. N2WS is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.9, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 10.0. N2WS holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N2WS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

N2W

Read 25 N2W reviews

5,465 Views
2,787 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

5,677 Views
5,223 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

N2W

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and N2W compete in data protection solutions. N2W seems to have the upper hand in AWS environments due to its simplicity and optimization tools, while OpenText Data Protector is favored for its robust integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is robust in system integration, supporting environments like SAP, Oracle, VMware, and Hyper-V, offering advanced deduplication. It integrates seamlessly with a variety of applications. N2W is noted for its simplicity, policy-based automation, cross-region disaster recovery, and cost optimization tools such as tiering snapshots.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector could improve its graphical interface, support framework, and backup scheduling. It faces criticisms for complexity and an outdated interface. N2W could enhance disaster recovery options, provide better integration in multicloud environments, and improve manual backup retention and onboarding processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector focuses on on-premises deployment, suitable for enterprises with such infrastructure, although customer service receives mixed reviews. N2W, optimized for public cloud deployment, receives praise for its straightforward customer service, especially in AWS environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector has higher pricing with a complex licensing model, less ideal for small to medium businesses. High ROI comes from its extensive integration and reliability. N2W offers a flexible pricing model, cost-effective for the SMB market with positive ROI, aided by efficient snapshot management and clear AWS Marketplace pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N2W

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

6th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (5th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (4th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of N2W is 1.1%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N2W	1.1%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	97.9%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

reviewer2802048

Service Delivery Manager at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Automated backups have transformed our multi-account recovery and now streamline compliance reporting

While N2WS has served us well, there are areas for improvement. The user interface feels somewhat dated and could benefit from modernization. Navigation between sections could be more intuitive, and the dashboard design could be more streamlined compared to contemporary AWS tools. The initial setup process has a steeper learning curve than we’d prefer, especially for complex multi-account configurations. More guided setup wizards would help new team members get up to speed faster. Reporting capabilities could be more granular, particularly around cost optimization metrics and backup performance analytics. Currently, we need to gather information from multiple screens to get comprehensive insights. For future releases, we’d value enhanced integration with AWS native services like Config and CloudTrail for better compliance reporting. More advanced scheduling options that adjust based on application load would also be beneficial. Better support for newer AWS services as they’re released would help us maintain comprehensive coverage as our infrastructure evolves. Additionally, native integration with popular ITSM tools beyond email notifications would improve our workflow automation.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Provides easy, one-click functionality and flexible backup policies and schedules for AWS workloads."

"A recovery process that had previously taken a team of engineers the better part of a day was successfully completed in under an hour."

"N2W has positively impacted our organization by assisting us in areas of cost savings when compared to other tools available, and it has also given us an extra layer of protection."

"The initial setup is easy."

"Having multiple policies and schedules handled for me takes the burden out of managing backups across multiple departments."

"N2WS has significantly improved our organization’s data protection and disaster recovery capabilities"

"N2W has significantly improved our operational efficiency and our confidence in our business continuity plan."

"N2WS is a powerful solution with a rich set of features designed to address even the most complex backup and disaster recovery requirements."

More N2W pros

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"We can quickly restore files that have been deleted or are missing from the system."

"It's supports Unix, Linux, all of the OS's. It's very stable software."

"Fantastic SAP backup resilience and reliability Offline and on-line consistent backup possibilities Oracle log treatments for archive log mode databases Affordable restores with preview possibilities"

"The ability to run multiple jobs to multiple devices and systems is the best part of this system."

"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."

"The most valuable feature of Data Protector is its integration with VMware."

"In terms of actually, reliably, backing things up, Data Protector is superior to the other products that we've used in-house."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"Improved disaster recovery options and expanded multicloud support are two areas where N2WS has already made significant advancements in the latest version."

"I would like to see native support for more AWS services beyond EC2 and EBS, such as full coverage of RDS, DynamoDB, and Redshift."

"I believe onboarding could be easier. While the platform supports multi-account architectures, the initial process for new customer accounts could be more automated."

"Pricing can increase as backup volumes grow, so it is important to balance the level of protection with cost-optimization strategies such as tiering snapshots to S3 or Glacier."

"The GUI could be slightly improved."

"The process for version upgrades, which sometimes requires deploying a new instance, could be streamlined to allow for a more seamless in-place update."

"More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios."

"One area where we would appreciate improvement is support for additional AWS native services, such as Lambda function backups and S3 beyond archive."

More N2W cons

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

"The product can be developed by including functionalities like DR, CDP, and SureBackup, which are currently unavailable in the solution."

"In general, you can say that Micro Focus Data Protector is behind in capabilities when compared with other backup solutions, such as Commvault, Symantec, NetBackup, but it is very strong for certain use cases such as array integration. We are using it in production even now. There should be some kind of cloud integration and archiving solutions. I think this is the area they need to focus on."

"Support is poor, I would rate it a two out of five."

"The biggest area of improvement for Data Protector would be the proper functioning and ease of configuration of clients behind firewalls and other security mechanisms."

"The interface has been the same for many years and needs to be updated."

"The major issue we are facing in this product is Sybase database integration."

"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

16%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

Marketing Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

Pricing is reasonable considering the features provided, especially for organizations heavily invested in AWS. The cost savings from automation and lifecycle management can offset the licensing cos...

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

While the platform is strong overall, the user interface could be further modernized and made more intuitive in certain areas, especially when navigating complex environments. Reporting and analyti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

Our primary use case is automated backup and disaster recovery for AWS workloads across multiple accounts and regions. We use N2WS to protect EC2 instances, EBS volumes, and critical application da...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Backup vs N2W

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Backup vs N2W

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs N2W

Compared 4% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs N2W

Compared 4% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs N2W

Compared 3% of the time

More N2W Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

Dell Data Protection Advisor vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N2W

June 2026

Download N2W product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

June 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

N2WS Backup & Recovery, N2WS Cloud Protection Manager, N2W Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial/BYOL

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Interactive Demo

N2WS

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

N2W offers a cloud-native backup and recovery platform tailored for AWS and Azure environments, delivering secure and rapid data protection.

N2W enables IT teams to effortlessly manage backup and restore processes within AWS and Azure environments. By leveraging policy-based management, users gain full control over rapid, secure recovery across regions and accounts. Designed to scale with workloads of any size, N2W ensures business continuity through features like immutable ransomware-protected backups and smart data lifecycle management. Hosted directly in the cloud account, it simplifies the protection and recovery of mission-critical applications.

What are N2W's key features?

Immutable Backups: Protects against ransomware with unchangeable data versions
Fast Recovery: Ensures rapid data restoration within seconds
Policy-Based Management: Automates backup processes for efficiency
Cost Savings: Optimizes storage with smart data lifecycle management
Granular Reporting: Offers detailed compliance-ready audit trails
Seamless Archival: Supports low-cost storage integration including Wasabi

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple management for quick data recovery
Automation: Reduces manual intervention with automated policies
Cost Optimization: Manages storage efficiently to save costs
Business Continuity: Ensures resilience with flexible scheduling

Organizations across sectors use N2W for automated backup and disaster recovery of AWS resources like EC2 instances and RDS databases. It's employed to manage schedules, streamline backups in production settings, and rely on S3 for storage, providing a robust data protection approach.

N2WS

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Deloitte, NASA, Johnson & Johnson, Dyson, Deuthsche Bahn, Skechers, Allan Gray, Hewlett Packard, St. John's University, City of Oakland

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2026

Free Report: N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.