MSP360 Backup vs N2W comparison

MSP360 and N2WS are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. MSP360 is ranked #33, while N2WS is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0. MSP360 holds a 1.2% mindshare in DRS, compared to N2WS’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of MSP360 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N2WS users who would recommend it.

MSP360 Backup

Read 15 MSP360 Backup reviews

1,613 Views
419 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N2W

Read 20 N2W reviews

1,340 Views
456 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MSP360 Backup

N2W

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

MSP360 Backup and N2W compete in the cloud data backup solutions category, providing secure options for data protection and recovery. MSP360 Backup has an edge in pricing and support, while N2W offers comprehensive features that justify its cost.

Features: MSP360 Backup supports cross-platform compatibility and multiple storage options, allowing flexible data backup solutions. N2W offers native AWS integration, automated snapshots, and policy-based backup automation, catering to AWS-centric enterprises with features like lifecycle management and cross-region recovery.

Room for Improvement: MSP360 can enhance its cloud-native integrations and reduce the complexity of its interface for non-experts. It could also improve scalability for larger enterprises and enhance backup speed. N2W can improve its cost structure to become more accessible to smaller businesses, expand its integrations beyond AWS, and simplify its restore process to accommodate less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MSP360 is known for a straightforward setup and exceptional customer support, making deployment smooth across different platforms. N2W targets AWS-inclined businesses with dedicated resources and detailed guidance, offering AWS-specific support. MSP360 has broader applicability, making deployment slightly easier in diverse environments.

Pricing and ROI: MSP360 is noted for its cost-effectiveness, promising good ROI due to transparent pricing, especially suitable for small businesses. N2W, while having a higher price, justifies it through advanced AWS-focused features, appealing to enterprises concentrating on cloud management and resilience. MSP360's affordability is an advantage, while N2W's pricing aligns with its robust feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed MSP360 Backup vs. N2W Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. N2W

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

60th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

45th

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

MSP Backup (8th)

N2W

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

7th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

6th

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

7th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N2W is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
N2W	1.5%
MSP360 Backup	1.2%
Other	97.3%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

reviewer2757345

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automation has transformed our backup process and validated our disaster recovery strategy

While the product is excellent, there are a couple of areas for potential improvement. The process for version upgrades, which sometimes requires deploying a new instance, could be streamlined to allow for a more seamless in-place update. It would be extremely useful to have the ability to set a retention period on manual backups. Occasionally, we take a manual snapshot before a major deployment, and currently, these can be forgotten, leading to unnecessary storage costs. Adding an 'auto-delete after X days' option to manual backups, similar to scheduled policies, would be a fantastic addition for cost management and general housekeeping. The EKS backup module should be a great feature, and it would have been a useful functionality to have for cluster backup management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its online backup capacity because you don't have to do an entire backup again and again, it just does whatever you type in, you type a, it goes a, you type b, it goes b. It doesn't take an entire site up again and again. So that incremental and bit by bit backup is important, it is a nice feature here."

"I was mainly concerned with cloud backups, OneDrive backups, consumer OneDrive, business OneDrive, Google backups, and SharePoint backups. The solution did a good job of the backup."

"The most valuable feature of MSP360 Backup is its reliability."

"General ease of use and performance of the Windows version is the most valuable feature."

"The UI is pretty good. It's very simple. That is one thing that we like about this. It's very user-friendly."

"Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end."

"The solution is simple to use and easy to configure."

"The solution is easy to access and handles things efficiently."

More MSP360 Backup pros

"The initial setup is easy."

"The product is successful with the SMB market."

"We had a ransomware event in 2023, and we were able to recover every machine with minimal effort."

"The recovery time is fantastic and proven. Also, by providing a simple interface, the solution lowers the cost."

"N2W has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to conduct recovery drills and share information with our customers about our improvements."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."

"N2WS is a perfect backup solution for AWS EC2 instances and VPC backups, and it has made our backup process and monitoring simple and effective."

"Provides easy, one-click functionality and flexible backup policies and schedules for AWS workloads."

More N2W pros

Cons

"The Linux GUI leaves a lot to be desired. It lacks many of the features of the Windows version and is buggy, but it is still usable."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."

"The restore time could improve. When we had an issue the restore time was lengthy."

"The interface feels like it is targeted for end users who typically are looking for an all-in-one integrated push button solution. It would be better if the interface had a beginner mode and an expert mode."

"The product could be more user-friendly."

"As for what can be improved, some reports could be simplified so that you know how much backup you have done and what your backup details are. That report is available but it is very tough to get. I would like to know "today I have just uploaded 35 MB, tomorrow I have loaded 10 MB so my trend of backup is increasing.""

"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."

More MSP360 Backup cons

"It could be improved to include disaster recovery in cross accounts for Azure in upcoming releases."

"The UI is a little dated and hard to use. Some of the buttons are a bit small. You have to go into the menu to get the settings you want."

"I believe onboarding could be easier. While the platform supports multi-account architectures, the initial process for new customer accounts could be more automated."

"The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient."

"The GUI could be slightly improved."

"S3 backups, which I know is already in the feature pipeline, would be a useful improvement."

"Additional features I would like to see are the ability to restore to different vendors, AWS and Azure, and/or the ability or take the information out of the AWS cloud."

"Improved disaster recovery options and expanded multicloud support are two areas where N2WS has already made significant advancements in the latest version."

More N2W cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"The solution is expensive."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is smooth, as I have not faced any issues while spinning up the instance from the marketplace, and the documentation is very comprehensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

While N2WS Backup & Recovery for AWS works very well, there are a few areas for improvement. As an enterprise managing a large number of accounts, the main challenge we face is the rollout of n...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

My primary use case for the N2WS Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial (BYOL) is to back up EC2 instances using AWS snapshots and manage those instances across approximately 70 AWS accounts. N2W...

See all answers

Comparisons

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 13% of the time

NinjaOne vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 7% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 6% of the time

BDRShield vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 6% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

AWS Backup vs N2W

Compared 17% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs N2W

Compared 15% of the time

Clumio vs N2W

Compared 10% of the time

Rubrik vs N2W

Compared 9% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs N2W

Compared 8% of the time

More N2W Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup

December 2025

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

N2W

December 2025

Download N2W product report

Also Known As

Cloudberry Backup

N2WS Backup & Recovery, N2WS Cloud Protection Manager, N2W Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial/BYOL

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

MSP360

N2WS

Overview

MSP360 Backup is a comprehensive data protection solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities to ensure the safety and security of critical data.

With support for various storage destinations, including local drives, network shares, and cloud storage providers, MSP360 Backup provides flexibility and scalability. It also offers advanced scheduling options, allowing users to automate backups based on specific time intervals or events.

The solution supports both full and incremental backups, minimizing storage requirements and optimizing backup speed. MSP360 Backup also includes built-in encryption and compression, ensuring data privacy and reducing storage costs. Additionally, it offers easy file and folder recovery, allowing users to quickly restore lost or corrupted data.

With its intuitive user interface and robust set of features, MSP360 Backup is a reliable and efficient solution for businesses looking to protect their valuable data.

MSP360

N2W offers a cloud-native backup and recovery platform tailored for AWS and Azure environments, delivering secure and rapid data protection.

N2W enables IT teams to effortlessly manage backup and restore processes within AWS and Azure environments. By leveraging policy-based management, users gain full control over rapid, secure recovery across regions and accounts. Designed to scale with workloads of any size, N2W ensures business continuity through features like immutable ransomware-protected backups and smart data lifecycle management. Hosted directly in the cloud account, it simplifies the protection and recovery of mission-critical applications.

What are N2W's key features?

Immutable Backups: Protects against ransomware with unchangeable data versions
Fast Recovery: Ensures rapid data restoration within seconds
Policy-Based Management: Automates backup processes for efficiency
Cost Savings: Optimizes storage with smart data lifecycle management
Granular Reporting: Offers detailed compliance-ready audit trails
Seamless Archival: Supports low-cost storage integration including Wasabi

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple management for quick data recovery
Automation: Reduces manual intervention with automated policies
Cost Optimization: Manages storage efficiently to save costs
Business Continuity: Ensures resilience with flexible scheduling

Organizations across sectors use N2W for automated backup and disaster recovery of AWS resources like EC2 instances and RDS databases. It's employed to manage schedules, streamline backups in production settings, and rely on S3 for storage, providing a robust data protection approach.

N2WS

Sample Customers

StratX

Deloitte, NASA, Johnson & Johnson, Dyson, Deuthsche Bahn, Skechers, Allan Gray, Hewlett Packard, St. John's University, City of Oakland

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup vs. N2W

December 2025

Free Report: MSP360 Backup vs. N2W

Find out what your peers are saying about MSP360 Backup vs. N2W and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MSP360 Backup vs. N2W report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors, best Backup and Recovery vendors, and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.