Carbonite Server vs N2W comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and N2WS are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. OpenText is ranked #42, while N2WS is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.9. OpenText holds a 1.3% mindshare in CB, compared to N2WS’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N2WS users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

4,387 Views
2,632 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N2W

Read 26 N2W reviews

7,217 Views
3,392 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

N2W

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Carbonite Server and N2W compete in the data protection market. Carbonite Server provides strong pricing and support, appealing to businesses seeking cost-effective solutions, whereas N2W attracts those seeking robust features and comprehensive recovery options.

Features: Carbonite Server offers seamless integration capabilities, comprehensive recovery options, and efficient data backup. N2W is known for advanced disaster recovery, superior cloud backup functionalities, and high customization options, catering to complex data management needs.

Room for Improvement: Carbonite Server could improve by offering more advanced cloud-based features, greater customization options, and enhanced disaster recovery capabilities. N2W could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving cost competitiveness, and expanding platform integration offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server is straightforward to deploy, with responsive customer support making it accessible. N2W, while having efficient deployment and reliable service, demands more in-depth deployment efforts for complex setups but provides thorough assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server offers lower setup costs and good ROI through affordable subscriptions, appealing to those on a budget. N2W requires higher initial investment but offers potentially superior ROI with its extensive features, appealing to those looking for long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. N2W Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N2W

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

57th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

42nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N2W

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

6th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

5th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N2W is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N2W	1.6%
Carbonite Server	1.3%
Other	97.1%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

reviewer2802048

Service Delivery Manager at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Automated backups have transformed our multi-account recovery and now streamline compliance reporting

While N2WS has served us well, there are areas for improvement. The user interface feels somewhat dated and could benefit from modernization. Navigation between sections could be more intuitive, and the dashboard design could be more streamlined compared to contemporary AWS tools. The initial setup process has a steeper learning curve than we’d prefer, especially for complex multi-account configurations. More guided setup wizards would help new team members get up to speed faster. Reporting capabilities could be more granular, particularly around cost optimization metrics and backup performance analytics. Currently, we need to gather information from multiple screens to get comprehensive insights. For future releases, we’d value enhanced integration with AWS native services like Config and CloudTrail for better compliance reporting. More advanced scheduling options that adjust based on application load would also be beneficial. Better support for newer AWS services as they’re released would help us maintain comprehensive coverage as our infrastructure evolves. Additionally, native integration with popular ITSM tools beyond email notifications would improve our workflow automation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"The advice that I have for people looking into using Carbonite Server is that it seems reliable and easy to use."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"The solution is very stable."

More Carbonite Server pros

"N2WS has significantly improved our organization’s data protection and disaster recovery capabilities"

"After acquiring two additional products in 2018, which we migrated from data centers to the cloud, N2W allowed us to streamline our backup process for three products within one tool."

"We had a ransomware event in 2023, and we were able to recover every machine with minimal effort."

"N2W has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to conduct recovery drills and share information with our customers about our improvements."

"I absolutely love this software and the peace of mind it brings to me and my organization."

"The recovery time is fantastic and proven. Also, by providing a simple interface, the solution lowers the cost."

"N2WS is a powerful solution with a rich set of features designed to address even the most complex backup and disaster recovery requirements."

"The ability to recover instances or volumes within minutes has improved our RTOs dramatically."

More N2W pros

Cons

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"I would like to see an improvement on the management user interface, as well as Kellion integrations."

"When you have to restore it, Carbonite takes a lot of time."

More Carbonite Server cons

"It could be improved to include disaster recovery in cross accounts for Azure in upcoming releases."

"S3 backups, which I know is already in the feature pipeline, would be a useful improvement."

"The GUI could be slightly improved."

"The solution has the option to take backup on-prem servers, but it's not very efficient."

"One area where we would appreciate improvement is support for additional AWS native services, such as Lambda function backups and S3 beyond archive."

"S3 storage backup for S3 backed services such as AWS Transfer Family."

"I would like to see native support for more AWS services beyond EC2 and EBS, such as full coverage of RDS, DynamoDB, and Redshift."

"There is room for improvement in stability."

More N2W cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

16%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

The pricing for N2W is a fixed cost based on the edition you want to use. All I would suggest is keeping an eye on billing in AWS, as N2W leverages AWS services such as the N2W instance hosting and...

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

There is room for improvement in the S3 storage backup for S3-backed services such as AWS Transfer Family.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

We used N2W primarily as part of our wider disaster recovery (DR) strategy in the business as a way to protect assets in AWS and to automatically schedule utilization of resources.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

AWS Backup vs N2W

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs N2W

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Backup vs N2W

Compared 4% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs N2W

Compared 4% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs N2W

Compared 3% of the time

More N2W Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

September 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

N2W

September 2026

Download N2W product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

N2WS Backup & Recovery, N2WS Cloud Protection Manager, N2W Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial/BYOL

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

OpenText

N2WS

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

N2W offers a cloud-native backup and recovery platform tailored for AWS and Azure environments, delivering secure and rapid data protection.

N2W enables IT teams to effortlessly manage backup and restore processes within AWS and Azure environments. By leveraging policy-based management, users gain full control over rapid, secure recovery across regions and accounts. Designed to scale with workloads of any size, N2W ensures business continuity through features like immutable ransomware-protected backups and smart data lifecycle management. Hosted directly in the cloud account, it simplifies the protection and recovery of mission-critical applications.

What are N2W's key features?

Immutable Backups: Protects against ransomware with unchangeable data versions
Fast Recovery: Ensures rapid data restoration within seconds
Policy-Based Management: Automates backup processes for efficiency
Cost Savings: Optimizes storage with smart data lifecycle management
Granular Reporting: Offers detailed compliance-ready audit trails
Seamless Archival: Supports low-cost storage integration including Wasabi

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple management for quick data recovery
Automation: Reduces manual intervention with automated policies
Cost Optimization: Manages storage efficiently to save costs
Business Continuity: Ensures resilience with flexible scheduling

Organizations across sectors use N2W for automated backup and disaster recovery of AWS resources like EC2 instances and RDS databases. It's employed to manage schedules, streamline backups in production settings, and rely on S3 for storage, providing a robust data protection approach.

N2WS

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Deloitte, NASA, Johnson & Johnson, Dyson, Deuthsche Bahn, Skechers, Allan Gray, Hewlett Packard, St. John's University, City of Oakland

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. N2W

September 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. N2W

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. N2W and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. N2W report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.