N2W vs VMware Live Recovery comparison

N2WS and Broadcom are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. N2WS is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.9, while Broadcom is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. N2WS holds a 1.6% mindshare in DRS, compared to Broadcom’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N2WS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

N2W

Read 20 N2W reviews

1,761 Views
564 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

VMware Live Recovery

Read 82 VMware Live Recovery reviews

5,329 Views
4,476 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

N2W

VMware Live Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

N2W and VMware Live Recovery are competing products in the disaster recovery space. N2W seems to have the upper hand in pricing and support, but VMware Live Recovery stands out due to its robust features, making it a preferred choice for those who value extensive capabilities.

Features: N2W offers automated backups, flexible scheduling, and AWS integration. VMware Live Recovery provides seamless integration with VMware environments, continuous data protection, and advanced recovery capabilities for quick data restoration.

Room for Improvement: N2W can enhance integration options beyond AWS and add more scheduling flexibility while improving backup speed. VMware Live Recovery might benefit from simplifying its deployment complexity and expanding beyond the VMware ecosystem, alongside offering more pricing packages for diverse enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N2W is known for its straightforward deployment process and dependable support within AWS environments. VMware Live Recovery requires a more complex deployment model tailored for VMware setups but is backed by comprehensive customer support, aligning closely with its ecosystem advantages.

Pricing and ROI: N2W offers competitive pricing leading to quicker ROI, particularly attractive for AWS users. VMware Live Recovery involves a higher initial setup cost but promises significant ROI through its extensive feature set and integration capabilities, with pricing justified by advanced functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed N2W vs. VMware Live Recovery Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. VMware Live Recovery

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

2.2

<p>N2WS Backup & Recovery users saved time and money, improved efficiency, reduced downtime, and achieved better data protection and ROI.</p>

Sentiment score

5.5

VMware Live Recovery offers strong ROI, reducing DR costs up to 50% and improving financial performance with effective resource planning.

In my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing, I have seen a return on investment as there are definitely fewer employees required to manage the backups, and there is definitely a major time save due to the single pane of glass.

NicholasCappuccino

Sr. Manager Data Protection at Epsilon

For more quotes and insights, download the N2W report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.1

N2W's customer service is praised for promptness, expertise, and proactive problem-solving, making them a valued partner for users.

Sentiment score

4.1

VMware Live Recovery customer service is generally effective, but occasional delays and improvement suggestions exist, especially with third-party issues.

Their support is amazing. They get back to you in a timely manner and work with you.

NicholasCappuccino

Sr. Manager Data Protection at Epsilon

We would rate the customer support of N2W a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10, as they are very easily accessible, friendly, and absolutely knowledgeable.

Adebayo Ogunleye

Director of Information Technology & Customer Success at Maplewave

Customer support for N2W is excellent, as they are able to answer quickly.

Sathish Devasenapathy

Director, Cloud Infrastructure and Systems Operations at d1g1t Inc.

For more quotes and insights, download the N2W report

They are knowledgeable.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

Our team has dedicated personnel for support who engage with the supporting teams.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

The technical support from VMware is very good and operates based on a service level.

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

3.8

N2W effectively manages AWS accounts and instances, ensuring seamless scaling and reliable backup without performance issues for growing needs.

Sentiment score

5.4

VMware Live Recovery is scalable, supports various environments, though licensing and upgrades may challenge some users.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the N2W report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

5.4

N2W is highly stable, with no downtime, exceptional cloud resource use, and consistent nine out of ten ratings.

Sentiment score

8.5

VMware Live Recovery is generally stable and reliable, though some users face issues during upgrades or high-capacity use.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the N2W report

For our test labs, dev labs, and production, it is very stable.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Room For Improvement

N2W requires UI, documentation, and functionality upgrades with enhanced automation, multicloud support, and comprehensive AWS integration.

VMware Live Recovery needs better storage integration, automation, support, interface, documentation, pricing, cloud compatibility, and enhanced AI capabilities.

Adding an 'auto-delete after X days' option to manual backups, similar to scheduled policies, would be a fantastic addition for cost management and general housekeeping.

reviewer2757345

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

An automated account enrollment or bulk import feature integrated with AWS Organizations or Control Tower would save significant time and reduce administrative overhead.

reviewer2772105

VP, Solutions Architecture at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Improved disaster recovery options and expanded multicloud support are two areas where N2WS has already made significant advancements in the latest version.

George Philippakos

Cloud Manager at St. John's University

For more quotes and insights, download the N2W report

It's important for the cost to be justified based on the features used in production.

Sven Nimmich

Solution Architect at Lenovo

I would like to see improved integration services with other solutions, such as SIEM management or security monitoring.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers appreciate N2W's competitive pricing, flexibility, and ROI, with easy AWS Marketplace purchases and praised usability.

VMware Live Recovery costs depend on VM count and protection plan, with pricing complexity increasing after the Broadcom acquisition.

Pricing can increase as backup volumes grow, so it is important to balance the level of protection with cost-optimization strategies such as tiering snapshots to S3 or Glacier.

MayanaKhan

Platform Engineer at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees

While N2W is a paid product, the cost is easily justified by the significant reduction in engineering hours spent on managing and troubleshooting custom backup scripts.

reviewer2757345

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

I believe N2WS offers a highly competitive pricing model, delivering excellent value.

George Philippakos

Cloud Manager at St. John's University

For more quotes and insights, download the N2W report

Previously, when acquiring a license for Ethiopian drug supply chains, the price was significantly high, especially after Broadcom joined VMware.

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

For cloud-based solutions, the cost seems quite pricey, so we stick to on-premises deployment.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

We mostly prefer to recommend this to customers due to ease of use, abundant features, and support.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Valuable Features

Users value ease of use, speed, cost efficiency, centralized management, and intuitive interfaces in backup and recovery features.

The solution provides automated disaster recovery, VMware integration, and seamless management for robust business continuity and operational efficiency.

Lifecycle management and automated transitions to lower-cost storage tiers have been instrumental in optimizing costs while meeting compliance and retention requirements.

George Philippakos

Cloud Manager at St. John's University

We had a ransomware event in 2023, and we were able to recover every machine with minimal effort.

reviewer2753805

IT Operations Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The ability to define backup schedules, retention periods, and disaster recovery policies and have them apply automatically based on resource tags scales perfectly with our environment and enforces a consistent data protection strategy across the organization.

reviewer2757345

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the N2W report

It is used for data replication between data centers and allows for quick response in times of failure, ensuring data availability.

ErmiasGirma

Cloud Infrastructure Engineer at Safaricom Ethiopia plc

If I talk about vCenter and the auto failover of the VMs, such as live migration, that is a very cool feature that we require in our environment because we have different data centers, and if some of the servers fail, they automatically failover and move the VM from one side to another.

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

The capability and the functionality of the features are very helpful for us.

Yosevan Sinaga Sinaga

IT Infrastructure Manager at TMLI

For more quotes and insights, download the VMware Live Recovery report

Categories and Ranking

N2W

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

7th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (8th), Cloud Backup (6th)

VMware Live Recovery

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of N2W is 1.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Live Recovery is 7.3%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
VMware Live Recovery	7.3%
N2W	1.6%
Other	91.1%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2757345

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automation has transformed our backup process and validated our disaster recovery strategy

While the product is excellent, there are a couple of areas for potential improvement. The process for version upgrades, which sometimes requires deploying a new instance, could be streamlined to allow for a more seamless in-place update. It would be extremely useful to have the ability to set a retention period on manual backups. Occasionally, we take a manual snapshot before a major deployment, and currently, these can be forgotten, leading to unnecessary storage costs. Adding an 'auto-delete after X days' option to manual backups, similar to scheduled policies, would be a fantastic addition for cost management and general housekeeping. The EKS backup module should be a great feature, and it would have been a useful functionality to have for cluster backup management.

Read full review

SuhailAkhtar

Integration Architect at App In Snap (Pvt) Ltd

Has enabled seamless VM management and automated failover while support response needs improvement

For support issues, they help with the issue, but it takes a very long time. The reason is that they engage a very initial resource and then escalate to another level, and during these level escalations, our time is wasted. They do not understand the severity of the issue. They go through step-by-step and then go to the upper level. This may be their SOP, but we require instant support and instant resolution of the problem, so here VMware Live Recovery is lacking. They follow their SOP, but they initially engage very low-level personnel who are not able to answer or resolve the issue, so they escalate or take a very long time to resolve the issue. The main issue is to improve the approach of resolving solutions. I may not be able to suggest new features because in these recent months, I have not been very close to it as we are exploring different solutions.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Government

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is smooth, as I have not faced any issues while spinning up the instance from the marketplace, and the documentation is very comprehensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

The EKS environment solution could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

Backup and snapshots. Before implementing a dedicated cloud-native solution, our primary pain point was the fragmented and manual nature of our data protection strategy. We were relying on a patchw...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

We have been using VMware Live Recovery since 2015, and most of our effort relies on it. I personally feel that it is very easy to use, easy to manage, and provides many features compared to other ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Backup vs N2W

Compared 17% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs N2W

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Backup vs N2W

Compared 9% of the time

Clumio vs N2W

Compared 8% of the time

Druva Phoenix vs N2W

Compared 6% of the time

More N2W Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 29% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 24% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs VMware Live Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Live Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N2W

January 2026

Download N2W product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Live Recovery

January 2026

Download VMware Live Recovery product report

Also Known As

N2WS Backup & Recovery, N2WS Cloud Protection Manager, N2W Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial/BYOL

VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, Datrium DRaaS , VMware SRM

Interactive Demo

N2WS

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

N2W offers a cloud-native backup and recovery platform tailored for AWS and Azure environments, delivering secure and rapid data protection.

N2W enables IT teams to effortlessly manage backup and restore processes within AWS and Azure environments. By leveraging policy-based management, users gain full control over rapid, secure recovery across regions and accounts. Designed to scale with workloads of any size, N2W ensures business continuity through features like immutable ransomware-protected backups and smart data lifecycle management. Hosted directly in the cloud account, it simplifies the protection and recovery of mission-critical applications.

What are N2W's key features?

Immutable Backups: Protects against ransomware with unchangeable data versions
Fast Recovery: Ensures rapid data restoration within seconds
Policy-Based Management: Automates backup processes for efficiency
Cost Savings: Optimizes storage with smart data lifecycle management
Granular Reporting: Offers detailed compliance-ready audit trails
Seamless Archival: Supports low-cost storage integration including Wasabi

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple management for quick data recovery
Automation: Reduces manual intervention with automated policies
Cost Optimization: Manages storage efficiently to save costs
Business Continuity: Ensures resilience with flexible scheduling

Organizations across sectors use N2W for automated backup and disaster recovery of AWS resources like EC2 instances and RDS databases. It's employed to manage schedules, streamline backups in production settings, and rely on S3 for storage, providing a robust data protection approach.

N2WS

VMware Live Recovery is a disaster recovery solution that protects and recovers virtual machines (VMs) across on-premise and public clouds. Key features include rapid ransomware recovery, an on-demand recovery environment for testing procedures without affecting production, live behavioral analysis to detect threats, push-button VM network isolation to contain threats, guided restore point selection, and immutable, air-gapped recovery points to prevent tampering. VMware Live Recovery provides a comprehensive solution to safeguard critical data and applications from cyberattacks and other disasters.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Deloitte, NASA, Johnson & Johnson, Dyson, Deuthsche Bahn, Skechers, Allan Gray, Hewlett Packard, St. John's University, City of Oakland

Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. VMware Live Recovery

December 2025

Free Report: N2W vs. VMware Live Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about N2W vs. VMware Live Recovery and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N2W vs. VMware Live Recovery report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.