Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Elastic Observability Logo

Top 10 Elastic Observability Alternatives

Vendor: Elastic
4.0 out of 5
Start review

Top Elastic Observability Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Elastic Observability based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Dynatrace, and Datadog. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Elastic Observability surpasses its competitors by providing real-time insights, seamless data integration, and advanced visualizations that empower users to efficiently monitor, analyze, and troubleshoot complex systems, ensuring optimal performance and reliability across all infrastructures.

Elastic Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Elastic, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Elastic Observability Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
Elastic Observability offers a versatile platform with expansive integration options and open-source licensing, appealing to budget-conscious users. In comparison, Wazuh focuses on comprehensive security and SIEM features, suitable for organizations prioritizing robust security and open-source adaptability in their monitoring solutions.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Wazuh Report
Elastic Observability has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Observability has a higher setup cost compared to Wazuh, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup for users.
Elastic Observability Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace excels with comprehensive APM features and rapid setup. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers scalability and cost-effectiveness. Dynatrace provides transaction-level insights, while Elastic emphasizes flexibility. Both have room for UI improvements and can enhance integration with legacy systems.
Download Dynatrace vs. Elastic Observability Report
Dynatrace offers a straightforward setup with transparency in initial costs, while Elastic Observability may involve more complex setup expenses, impacting overall budgeting strategies for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace offers a straightforward setup with transparency in initial costs, while Elastic Observability may involve more complex setup expenses, impacting overall budgeting strategies for businesses.
Elastic Observability Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers a hosted model with features like sharable dashboards and intuitive tags, ideal for diverse users. In comparison, Elastic Observability is valued for strong search capabilities and multi-tenancy, appealing to those needing scalable solutions with powerful search functions.
Download Datadog vs. Elastic Observability Report
Datadog's setup cost is noted for being straightforward with minimal configuration, while Elastic Observability often requires more initial setup effort. This difference highlights Datadog's ease of deployment compared to the more involved setup process of Elastic Observability.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is noted for being straightforward with minimal configuration, while Elastic Observability often requires more initial setup effort. This difference highlights Datadog's ease of deployment compared to the more involved setup process of Elastic Observability.
Elastic Observability Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers cost-effective monitoring due to its comprehensive alerting and open-source nature. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels with advanced analytics and seamless Elastic product integration. Zabbix suits those seeking simplicity, while Elastic Observability appeals to buyers desiring powerful features and better support.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Elastic Observability entails higher initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Elastic Observability entails higher initial setup expenses.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in log management with rapid incident response and versatile deployment. In comparison, Elastic Observability is cost-effective with strong cloud features and text search. Buyers may choose Splunk for comprehensive support or Elastic for open-source flexibility and affordability.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs substantial setup costs, whereas Elastic Observability offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs substantial setup costs, whereas Elastic Observability offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.
Elastic Observability Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
New Relic excels in customer support and offers competitive pricing, attracting budget-conscious buyers with its user-friendly dashboards and alerting capabilities. In comparison, Elastic Observability provides extensive integration options and powerful search capabilities, appealing to those needing comprehensive features despite a higher cost.
Download Elastic Observability vs. New Relic Report
New Relic's setup cost is higher than Elastic Observability's, making it a less budget-friendly option. Elastic Observability offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to those with tighter budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
New Relic's setup cost is higher than Elastic Observability's, making it a less budget-friendly option. Elastic Observability offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to those with tighter budgets.
Elastic Observability Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Azure Monitor excels in integration with Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Elastic Observability provides flexible data ingestion and visualization. Azure Monitor benefits Azure users, while Elastic's auto-scaling and search functionalities attract those needing diverse data handling. Azure Monitor's costing fits within Azure; Elastic's varied usage pricing can offer broader ROI.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Elastic Observability Report
Azure Monitor's setup cost is relatively higher, while Elastic Observability offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Monitor's setup cost is relatively higher, while Elastic Observability offers a more affordable setup.
Elastic Observability Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides deep diagnostics and intuitive dashboards for complex environments, excelling in transactional awareness and JVM memory monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those integrating with the Elastic Stack suite for comprehensive logging and integration capabilities.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves initial setup costs that may impact smaller budgets, while Elastic Observability offers a more cost-efficient startup, distinguishing them through their differing financial entry barriers.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves initial setup costs that may impact smaller budgets, while Elastic Observability offers a more cost-efficient startup, distinguishing them through their differing financial entry barriers.
Elastic Observability Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Grafana offers powerful visualization and customization options, appealing for its open-source flexibility. In comparison, Elastic Observability integrates seamlessly with the Elastic Stack, providing advanced logging and tracing. Elastic Observability is ideal for enterprises needing deep ELK stack integration, while Grafana suits users prioritizing flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Grafana Report
Grafana's setup cost is low and straightforward, ideal for quick deployment. In contrast, Elastic Observability requires a higher initial investment, with a more complex setup that might appeal to enterprises seeking advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Grafana's setup cost is low and straightforward, ideal for quick deployment. In contrast, Elastic Observability requires a higher initial investment, with a more complex setup that might appeal to enterprises seeking advanced features.
Elastic Observability Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Sentry specializes in error tracking and real-time performance monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers comprehensive logging, tracing, and metrics capabilities. Sentry could enhance its integration, while Elastic Observability requires better documentation. Sentry's straightforward deployment contrasts with Elastic Observability's superior customer service.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Sentry Report
Sentry has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which is praised for its lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Sentry has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which is praised for its lower initial investment.
Elastic Observability Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability excels with its comprehensive feature set and affordability for large-scale deployments. In comparison, Grafana Loki offers simplicity and flexibility in log management. Elastic's powerful search contrasts with Loki's cost-effective dashboard creation, meeting varying monitoring and deployment needs efficiently.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Grafana Loki Report
Elastic Observability incurs significant setup costs, while Grafana Loki offers a more affordable setup. The pricing distinction highlights a key difference between the comprehensive capabilities of Elastic Observability and the cost-effective approach of Grafana Loki.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Observability incurs significant setup costs, while Grafana Loki offers a more affordable setup. The pricing distinction highlights a key difference between the comprehensive capabilities of Elastic Observability and the cost-effective approach of Grafana Loki.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor ensures ease of deployment and flexible pricing, attracting businesses with straightforward monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers comprehensive data analytics and AI-enhanced operations, appealing to enterprises needing extensive data parsing and customization despite its pricing complexity.
Download Elastic Observability vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is straightforward, whereas Elastic Observability offers a more complex and scalable pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is straightforward, whereas Elastic Observability offers a more complex and scalable pricing model.
Elastic Observability Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
ThousandEyes offers detailed network insights and cloud provider monitoring, ideal for prioritizing network performance. In comparison, Elastic Observability provides flexible data analytics with Kibana integration, suitable for extensive customization and large-scale management. ThousandEyes excels in network visibility; Elastic provides affordable, scalable data solutions.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ThousandEyes Report
ThousandEyes has a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Observability incurs a variable setup cost based on configurations. ThousandEyes is assessed as more predictable in initial pricing compared to the flexible structure of Elastic Observability.
View comparison
Pricing
ThousandEyes has a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Observability incurs a variable setup cost based on configurations. ThousandEyes is assessed as more predictable in initial pricing compared to the flexible structure of Elastic Observability.
Elastic Observability Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability integrates advanced machine learning and plugin support, offering a robust solution for data monitoring. In comparison, Prometheus excels in scalable metrics collection, ideal for cloud-native environments, and provides flexible cost-effective monitoring through open-source deployment.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Prometheus Group Report
Elastic Observability requires a substantial initial setup investment, whereas Prometheus Group offers a more cost-efficient setup, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Observability requires a substantial initial setup investment, whereas Prometheus Group offers a more cost-efficient setup, highlighting a distinct difference in upfront expenses.
Elastic Observability Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
AWS X-Ray offers cost-effective observability with seamless integration into AWS and reliable support. In comparison, Elastic Observability provides advanced features for deeper insights, with comprehensive analytics and visualization tools. AWS X-Ray's ease of deployment contrasts with Elastic Observability's steep learning curve.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Elastic Observability Report
AWS X-Ray has minimal initial setup costs, while Elastic Observability incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between these observability solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS X-Ray has minimal initial setup costs, while Elastic Observability incurs higher setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between these observability solutions.
Elastic Observability Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI specializes in scalable, open-source monitoring with customizable plugins and advanced alerts. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels at data visualization and machine learning, offering detailed insights. Nagios suits cost-sensitive environments, while Elastic caters to enterprises seeking advanced data analysis.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Nagios XI Report
Nagios XI's setup cost is an upfront investment, while Elastic Observability offers a flexible pricing model, highlighting the contrast in initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI's setup cost is an upfront investment, while Elastic Observability offers a flexible pricing model, highlighting the contrast in initial financial commitment.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
ServiceNow IT Operations Management is ideal for enterprises seeking comprehensive asset management and integration capabilities. In comparison, Elastic Observability appeals to those needing flexible log management and monitoring; it supports hybrid environments with an open-source approach. Both solutions offer unique strengths and address specific operational needs.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
ServiceNow IT Operations Management setup cost is notably higher, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly option. The investment difference highlights ServiceNow's comprehensive features compared to Elastic's focus on affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
ServiceNow IT Operations Management setup cost is notably higher, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly option. The investment difference highlights ServiceNow's comprehensive features compared to Elastic's focus on affordability.
Elastic Observability Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability offers extensive integrations, flexibility, and a powerful search capability beneficial for complex setups. In comparison, Checkmk enables rapid deployment and effective alerting, making it suitable for budget-conscious users with resource monitoring needs. Both offer strong technical support and cost-effectiveness.
Download Checkmk vs. Elastic Observability Report
Elastic Observability involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its advanced features and scalability, while Checkmk offers a cost-effective initial setup, making it suitable for smaller businesses with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Observability involves a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its advanced features and scalability, while Checkmk offers a cost-effective initial setup, making it suitable for smaller businesses with budget constraints.
Elastic Observability Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
LogicMonitor excels in dashboards with easy customization, enhancing user experience through effective alert tuning. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers comprehensive machine learning and logging features. Elastic's open-source nature and pricing flexibility can attract cost-conscious buyers, while LogicMonitor appeals to those valuing robust visualizations.
Download Elastic Observability vs. LogicMonitor Report
LogicMonitor features straightforward setup costs, emphasizing budget-friendly onboarding, while Elastic Observability incurs higher setup expenses, reflecting its complex deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
LogicMonitor features straightforward setup costs, emphasizing budget-friendly onboarding, while Elastic Observability incurs higher setup expenses, reflecting its complex deployment.
Elastic Observability Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Nagios Core offers flexibility with open-source architecture, ideal for those seeking cost-effective, customizable monitoring solutions. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in centralized logging and data visualization, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive support and scalable analytics platforms for hybrid cloud environments.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Nagios Core Report
Nagios Core is favored for its low setup costs with a self-managed model, while Elastic Observability offers a higher setup cost reflecting its cloud-based features and support.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios Core is favored for its low setup costs with a self-managed model, while Elastic Observability offers a higher setup cost reflecting its cloud-based features and support.
Elastic Observability Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Centron offers scalability, extensive monitoring, and integrations, appealing for infrastructure management without high costs. In comparison, Elastic Observability's strong search and log analysis with flexible visualizations make it ideal for enterprises focusing on log management and data-driven incident responses.
Download Centreon vs. Elastic Observability Report
Centreon reviews highlight lower setup costs, while Elastic Observability is noted for higher initial expenses, emphasizing a cost difference in implementation between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Centreon reviews highlight lower setup costs, while Elastic Observability is noted for higher initial expenses, emphasizing a cost difference in implementation between the two solutions.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud appeals with customizable dashboards and machine learning features, making it attractive for deep insights into microservices. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers cost-effective log analytics and flexibility, suited for smaller enterprises seeking affordability and scalability with Elastic's open-source foundation.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, offering comprehensive real-time monitoring features while Elastic provides a more cost-effective solution tailored for basic observability needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, offering comprehensive real-time monitoring features while Elastic provides a more cost-effective solution tailored for basic observability needs.
Elastic Observability Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Amazon CloudWatch excels in real-time monitoring and AWS integration. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers open-source flexibility and centralized logging. Each provides distinct advantages; CloudWatch is ideal for AWS users, while Elastic offers cost-effective options with extensive logging capabilities.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Elastic Observability Report
Amazon CloudWatch offers a flexible setup with no upfront costs, while Elastic Observability requires an initial investment, making it less accessible for entry-level users.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon CloudWatch offers a flexible setup with no upfront costs, while Elastic Observability requires an initial investment, making it less accessible for entry-level users.
Elastic Observability Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
A tech buyer might choose Icinga for its network monitoring and community support. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in analytics and seamless integration, appealing to those seeking extensive data analysis. Icinga's lower costs contrast with Elastic's long-term ROI potential.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Icinga Report
Icinga offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which tends to have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Icinga offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which tends to have higher initial expenses.
Elastic Observability Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
OpsRamp provides comprehensive infrastructure monitoring and automated alerting, enhancing IT operational efficiency with robust support and competitive pricing. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers flexible data analytics and extensive integration options, making it suitable for organizations seeking deeper insights and scalable solutions.
Download Elastic Observability vs. OpsRamp Report
OpsRamp's setup cost is generally perceived as straightforward and cost-effective, while Elastic Observability's setup cost is viewed as potentially more complex and higher, reflecting their distinct approaches to implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
OpsRamp's setup cost is generally perceived as straightforward and cost-effective, while Elastic Observability's setup cost is viewed as potentially more complex and higher, reflecting their distinct approaches to implementation.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.0 out of 5
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers extensive network analytics, excelling in integration with Fortinet devices. In comparison, Elastic Observability focuses on application performance in hybrid environments with cost-effectiveness. FortiAnalyzer is ideal for Fortinet networks, while Elastic appeals to enterprises seeking data visualization.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Report
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer features a straightforward setup cost while Elastic Observability requires a more comprehensive initial investment, highlighting a significant contrast in setup complexity and expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer features a straightforward setup cost while Elastic Observability requires a more comprehensive initial investment, highlighting a significant contrast in setup complexity and expenses.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers comprehensive server monitoring with real-time alerts and extensive reporting. In comparison, Elastic Observability provides seamless integration with the Elastic Stack and powerful analytics. SolarWinds is noted for easier setup, whereas Elastic demands expertise but delivers advanced data visualization.
Download Elastic Observability vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is praised for its lower setup cost, while Elastic Observability is noted for its higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is praised for its lower setup cost, while Elastic Observability is noted for its higher initial investment.
Elastic Observability Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels with multi-tenant environments, custom dashboards, and flexible integrations for comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability is recognized for easy deployment and powerful search in an open-source framework, suitable for hybrid clouds with strong analytics and visualization through Kibana.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic's setup cost is straightforward with a comprehensive pricing model, while Elastic Observability offers a flexible pricing structure based on usage, highlighting differences in cost predictability and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic's setup cost is straightforward with a comprehensive pricing model, while Elastic Observability offers a flexible pricing structure based on usage, highlighting differences in cost predictability and scalability.
Elastic Observability Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive monitoring and reliable performance, ideal for detailed analytics and rapid insights. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in customization and integration, making it suitable for environments requiring large dataset handling and flexible visualization. Each solution meets diverse technical monitoring needs.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, making it an affordable choice for tech buyers needing root cause analysis and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Elastic Observability's advanced features and extensive integrations justify its higher cost for buyers handling large data volumes and diverse environments.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Elastic Observability Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which offers a more cost-effective entry for organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which offers a more cost-effective entry for organizations.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5

Google Cloud's operations suite excels in integration with Google services and ease of deployment, ideal for Google ecosystem users. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers powerful search, customizable dashboards, and flexibility, appealing to those needing advanced features and multi-platform support despite higher pricing.

Download Elastic Observability vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report
Google Cloud's operations suite has a low setup cost, offering straightforward integration, whereas Elastic Observability's setup cost is higher but provides extensive customization. Elastic Observability requires more initial investment compared to the simpler setup process of Google C...
View comparison
Pricing
Google Cloud's operations suite has a low setup cost, offering straightforward integration, whereas Elastic Observability's setup cost is higher but provides extensive customization. Elastic Observability requires more initial investment compared to the simpler setup process of Google C...
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
VMware Aria Operations for Applications appeals to those seeking seamless integration and advanced analytics in a unified suite. In comparison, Elastic Observability attracts tech buyers with its flexible data ingestion and real-time metrics suitable for diverse, scalable environments.
Download Elastic Observability vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
VMware Aria Operations for Applications has a lower initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a cost-efficient entry point for VMware users. Elastic Observability, though more expensive initially, offers scalable capabilities suitable for growing enterprise needs.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Aria Operations for Applications has a lower initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a cost-efficient entry point for VMware users. Elastic Observability, though more expensive initially, offers scalable capabilities suitable for growing enterprise needs.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management provides comprehensive network visibility and scalability with precise data collection. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in analytics and integration capabilities, delivering cost-effective performance measurement with robust support. IBM focuses on hybrid environments, while Elastic emphasizes affordability with flexible pricing.
Download Elastic Observability vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report
IBM SevOne NPM has a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne NPM has a straightforward setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more flexible pricing structure.
Elastic Observability Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Elastic Observability is chosen for its seamless integration and competitive pricing. In comparison, Honeycomb.io attracts organizations needing advanced analytics despite higher costs, with intuitive design and quick onboarding. Elastic's comprehensive support contrasts with Honeycomb.io's personal customer interactions.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Honeycomb.io Report
Elastic Observability's setup costs are higher compared to Honeycomb.io, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Elastic Observability's setup costs are higher compared to Honeycomb.io, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for users.
Elastic Observability Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold features versatile network management and real-time alerts, making it ideal for network-focused users. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in powerful data ingestion and detailed dashboards, appealing to those needing advanced analytics despite higher costs. WhatsUp Gold offers straightforward deployment, while Elastic's extensive resources support complex environments.
Download Elastic Observability vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold features a lower setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more robust initial investment, catering to different organizational budgets and initial deployment preferences.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold features a lower setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more robust initial investment, catering to different organizational budgets and initial deployment preferences.
Elastic Observability Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Coralogix offers real-time monitoring and intuitive alerts with competitive pricing and strong support, making it suitable for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Elastic Observability, known for comprehensive search and robust analytics, justifies a higher price with advanced features, catering to those needing powerful analytics capabilities.
Download Coralogix vs. Elastic Observability Report
Coralogix has an affordable setup cost, while Elastic Observability's setup is more costly. Coralogix provides a cost-effective solution, but Elastic Observability may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Coralogix has an affordable setup cost, while Elastic Observability's setup is more costly. Coralogix provides a cost-effective solution, but Elastic Observability may involve higher initial expenses.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence)
4.1 out of 5
Splunk ITSI provides advanced machine-learning capabilities and monitoring, attracting tech buyers needing predictive analytics. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers powerful log monitoring and search functionalities, appealing to those valuing open-source flexibility and scalability. Splunk ITSI emphasizes smoother deployment, while Elastic Observability is noted for cost effectiveness.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Report
Splunk ITSI's setup cost is reportedly high, contrasting with Elastic Observability's lower initial setup expense. This significant cost difference influences initial budgeting for potential users of each platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk ITSI's setup cost is reportedly high, contrasting with Elastic Observability's lower initial setup expense. This significant cost difference influences initial budgeting for potential users of each platform.
Elastic Observability Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
BigPanda is ideal for rapid response with seamless tool integration for incident management. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers extensive monitoring across systems, appealing to tech buyers needing scalability and flexibility. BigPanda emphasizes automation, while Elastic is favored for its comprehensive platform visibility.
Download BigPanda vs. Elastic Observability Report
BigPanda offers lower setup costs, while Elastic Observability incurs higher setup expenses. These differences highlight variations in initial investment required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
BigPanda offers lower setup costs, while Elastic Observability incurs higher setup expenses. These differences highlight variations in initial investment required for each solution.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
Instana Dynamic APM
3.8 out of 5
Instana Dynamic APM offers real-time, AI-driven automation for application performance insights, with easy integration and automated root cause analysis. In comparison, Elastic Observability leverages the Elastic Stack for centralized logging and metrics, providing flexibility and powerful search capabilities ideal for scalable environments.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Instana Dynamic APM Report
Instana Dynamic APM typically has a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which is known for its lower setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Instana Dynamic APM typically has a higher initial setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which is known for its lower setup fees.
Elastic Observability Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Huawei eSight offers a holistic network management with efficient support, automation, and performance optimization. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in log analysis and advanced analytics, making it ideal for data-centric businesses. Huawei's streamlined deployment contrasts with Elastic's flexible, yet configurable, cloud-based setup.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Huawei eSight Report
Huawei eSight has low setup costs, appealing for budget-conscious users, while Elastic Observability offers higher initial costs but with extensive features, creating a distinct choice for organizations weighing investment against capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Huawei eSight has low setup costs, appealing for budget-conscious users, while Elastic Observability offers higher initial costs but with extensive features, creating a distinct choice for organizations weighing investment against capabilities.
Elastic Observability Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Moogsoft excels in real-time data analysis and noise reduction, ideal for rapid incident resolution. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers extensive monitoring tools and scalability, suitable for organizations needing versatile observability solutions across complex IT environments. Each caters to distinct organizational needs.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Moogsoft Report
Moogsoft has a higher setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly setup for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Moogsoft has a higher setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly setup for users.
Elastic Observability Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Alluvio Aternity offers comprehensive end-user experience monitoring and real-time analytics with straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. In comparison, Elastic Observability provides powerful search capabilities, unified log, metric, and trace data handling, alongside a higher ROI but more complex deployment and setup requirements.
Download Alluvio Aternity vs. Elastic Observability Report
Alluvio Aternity has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio Aternity has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which offers a more affordable initial implementation.
Elastic Observability Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
Dell CloudIQ excels in integration and analytics within Dell hardware environments. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers extensive data correlation for varied systems. Dell CloudIQ is cost-effective for Dell users, while Elastic provides multi-platform support, appealing to diverse infrastructure needs.
Download Dell CloudIQ vs. Elastic Observability Report
Dell CloudIQ has a straightforward setup cost that offers transparency, while Elastic Observability presents a more flexible setup cost structure tailored to various businesses' needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell CloudIQ has a straightforward setup cost that offers transparency, while Elastic Observability presents a more flexible setup cost structure tailored to various businesses' needs.
Elastic Observability Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint offers superior synthetic monitoring and real-user monitoring, providing comprehensive monitoring across geographies. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in real-time analytics and flexible data modeling. A tech buyer might choose Catchpoint for detailed user experience tracking, while Elastic Observability suits extensive data correlation needs.
Download Catchpoint vs. Elastic Observability Report
Catchpoint's setup cost is higher due to its comprehensive feature set, whereas Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it an attractive option for smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Catchpoint's setup cost is higher due to its comprehensive feature set, whereas Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it an attractive option for smaller budgets.
Elastic Observability Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Pandora FMS offers simplicity and flexibility with features like auto-discovery and both agent and agentless monitoring, suitable for various environments. In comparison, Elastic Observability focuses on powerful search capabilities and features like machine learning, ideal for hybrid and cloud environments.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Pandora FMS Report
Pandora FMS offers a straightforward setup with clear costs, while Elastic Observability has potentially higher setup expenses with additional configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Pandora FMS offers a straightforward setup with clear costs, while Elastic Observability has potentially higher setup expenses with additional configurations.
Elastic Observability Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5

eG Enterprise excels in monitoring efficiency and automated diagnostics. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers advanced analytics and extensive scalability. While eG Enterprise is cost-effective with strong ROI and excellent support, Elastic Observability's flexibility and comprehensive features justify its higher initial costs.

Download Elastic Observability vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise has a moderate setup cost, while Elastic Observability is cost-effective for initial setup. Elastic Observability is economically favorable, whereas eG Enterprise offers a balanced approach in cost for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise has a moderate setup cost, while Elastic Observability is cost-effective for initial setup. Elastic Observability is economically favorable, whereas eG Enterprise offers a balanced approach in cost for setup.
Elastic Observability Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
OpenText SiteScope excels in infrastructure monitoring and dynamic topology views. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers real-time analytics and seamless integration with other Elastic products. OpenText SiteScope requires better integration flexibility, while Elastic Observability needs improved dashboard customization. Pricing favors Elastic Observability with a higher perceived ROI.
Download Elastic Observability vs. OpenText SiteScope Report
OpenText SiteScope has higher setup costs compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference in initial financial investment between the two monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText SiteScope has higher setup costs compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference in initial financial investment between the two monitoring solutions.
Elastic Observability Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Elastic Observability Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud excels in pricing and support, attracting enterprises focused on economical monitoring with scalability. In comparison, Elastic Observability impresses with comprehensive features, offering robust data visualization for those seeking detailed analytics despite higher costs. Zenoss Cloud's simplicity contrasts with Elastic's flexible, advanced configurations.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud incurs significant setup costs, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud incurs significant setup costs, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Elastic Observability Logo
Elastic Observability Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Applications Manager is praised for its comprehensive monitoring, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels with powerful analytics, scalability, and advanced features. Each solution addresses different needs, offering unique strengths for various IT operation management requirements.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a lower setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a lower setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Log Management