Azure Monitor vs Elastic Observability comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
19,277 views|16,430 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Elastic Logo
12,565 views|10,451 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jun 28, 2023

We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Elastic Observability based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Azure Monitor is cloud-native and may take a few days to configure based on the environment's complexity. On the other hand, Elastic Observability's setup complexity varies, with some finding it simple for Docker installation while others find it highly complex due to the distributed nature of the solution and multiple cluster configurations.
  • Features: Azure Monitor focuses on log analysis, graphs and charts, and reporting, while Elastic Observability provides machine learning, easy deployment, and custom development. Azure Monitor is highly compatible with Microsoft technologies, whereas Elastic Observability has the Elastic server and numerous plugins.
  • Pricing: Azure Monitor charges based on log file sizing and the number of services required, while Elastic Observability's pricing varies depending on license type and usage. Some components are included in the license or open source, making it more attractive to some customers. While some find Elastic Observability's pricing reasonable, others consider it expensive.
  • Service and Support: Azure Monitor's customer service has mixed satisfaction, while Elastic Observability generally has positive experiences with great tech support and a helpful online community. Some users have found the documentation and team's skills to be sufficient for Azure Monitor.
  • ROI: Users have varied experiences with Azure Monitor's ROI, while Elastic Observability has been proven to be cost-effective. It has reduced incidents and provided complete visibility with data compression and management features. 

Comparison Results: Azure Monitor has better integration with Microsoft technologies, more out-of-the-box functionalities, lower cost, and better customer support. Elastic Observability is noted for its machine learning and custom development capabilities, but has a steep learning curve, lacks comprehensive visualization and metrics, and could improve pricing. Overall, Azure Monitor is seen as a more robust and stable product that offers a centralized location for resource monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Elastic Observability Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs.""The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth.""Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data.""The upside to the solution is if you are working in a Microsoft or Azure environment, it makes things easier.""It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools.""One of the most useful aspects of this solution is the out-of-the-box functionality on all areas, especially on Application Insights, zero instrumentation, and artificial intelligence for event correlation.""The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use.""It is a robust, stable product."

More Azure Monitor Pros →

"Good design and easy to use once implemented.""Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform.""It is a powerful tool that allows users to collect and transform logs as needed, enabling flexible visualization and analysis.""Machine learning is the most valuable feature of this solution.""It has always been a stable solution.""I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability.""The price is very less expensive compared to the other solutions.""We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."

More Elastic Observability Pros →

"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved.""Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful.""The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners.""I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP.""n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler.""The query builder could be better. In comparison to other monitoring tools, in order to use Azure Monitor, your engineers need to have KQL experience. If they don't, it's not intuitive as a system.""Azure Monitor is not user-friendly, and the interface is not exciting. Switching between the dashboards is not easy.""They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."

More Azure Monitor Cons →

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper.""They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base.""Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial.""In the future, Elastic APM needs a portfolio iTool. They can provide an easy way to develop the custom UI for Kibana.""Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema.""The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities.""Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances.""Elastic APM's visualization is not that great compared to other tools. It's number of metrics is very low."

More Elastic Observability Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "Azure Monitor is a competitively priced solution."
  • "Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."
  • "The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."
  • "The licensing is a monthly fee."
  • "I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."
  • "The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
  • More Azure Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."
  • "There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."
  • "Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."
  • "The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."
  • "Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."
  • "One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."
  • "Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."
  • "We will buy a premium license after POC."
  • More Elastic Observability Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
    Top Answer:We cannot use AI services with the solution.
    Top Answer:Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is not that cheap.
    Top Answer:The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration… more »
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Learn More

    Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

    With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

    Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

    Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

    Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

    To effectively monitor and gain insights across your distributed systems, you need to have all your observability data in one stack. Break down silos by bringing together application, infrastructure, and user data into a unified solution for end-to-end observability and alerting.
    Rely on the most widely deployed observability platform available, built on the proven Elastic Stack (also known as the ELK Stack) to converge silos, delivering unified visibility and actionable insights.
    Sample Customers
    Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
    PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
    Top Industries
    Computer Software Company32%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Monitor vs. Elastic Observability
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Elastic Observability and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while Elastic Observability is ranked 7th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Elastic Observability is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Sentry, Prometheus and AWS X-Ray, whereas Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics, Sentry and Datadog. See our Azure Monitor vs. Elastic Observability report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.