Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WorkflowGen Logo

Top 10 WorkflowGen Alternatives

Vendor: WorkflowGen
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WorkflowGen Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WorkflowGen based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, and Appian. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

WorkflowGen Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WorkflowGen, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WorkflowGen Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Camunda excels in integration flexibility and developer support, making it ideal for tech-savvy teams. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers comprehensive features and personalized service, appealing to businesses seeking thorough workflow management and support. Camunda's lower costs benefit cost-conscious organizations, while WorkflowGen targets feature-rich needs.
Download Camunda vs. WorkflowGen Report
Camunda has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive feature set, while WorkflowGen offers a more budget-friendly option appealing to smaller businesses or projects with limited initial budgets.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive feature set, while WorkflowGen offers a more budget-friendly option appealing to smaller businesses or projects with limited initial budgets.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
Microsoft Power Apps
3.9 out of 5
WorkflowGen specializes in workflow flexibility with tailored automation for process improvement. In comparison, Power Apps excels in versatility, offering broad development features and integration with Microsoft 365 and Azure. WorkflowGen appeals to those seeking cost-effective setups, while Power Apps attracts users valuing scalability.
Download Microsoft Power Apps vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Microsoft Power Apps has a higher setup fee but includes more extensive feature integration options.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen offers a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Microsoft Power Apps has a higher setup fee but includes more extensive feature integration options.
WorkflowGen Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Appian's innovative features like intuitive process modeling appeal to those seeking complex automation, while its cloud deployment enhances scalability and service. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers robust form design and flexible scripting, catering to projects seeking customizable solutions with diverse deployment options.
Download Appian vs. WorkflowGen Report
Appian involves higher setup costs compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian involves higher setup costs compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager
4.1 out of 5
SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in collaborative modeling and offers attractive pricing. In comparison, WorkflowGen delivers strong automation capabilities with extensive customization options. SAP Signavio's intuitive deployment and support cater to rapid onboarding; meanwhile, WorkflowGen’s features justify its initial setup costs.
Download SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. WorkflowGen Report
SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while WorkflowGen involves a more complex setup with potentially higher expenses. The difference in setup processes highlights varying levels of initial investment required for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while WorkflowGen involves a more complex setup with potentially higher expenses. The difference in setup processes highlights varying levels of initial investment required for each solution.
WorkflowGen Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Pega Platform excels in customer support and pricing, appealing to those seeking strong automation and scalability. In comparison, WorkflowGen's extensive features and integration capabilities offer flexibility, making it ideal for businesses wanting comprehensive solutions with straightforward deployment.
Download Pega Platform vs. WorkflowGen Report
Pega Platform offers a more complex setup process leading to higher initial costs, while WorkflowGen provides a simpler and more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Pega Platform offers a more complex setup process leading to higher initial costs, while WorkflowGen provides a simpler and more affordable setup option.
WorkflowGen Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Bizagi's intuitive design and strong process modeling are appreciated by users. In comparison, WorkflowGen's flexibility in handling complex workflows and integration capabilities makes it attractive. Bizagi's cost-effectiveness is noted, while WorkflowGen's advanced functionalities justify its higher price, offering compelling ROI for tech buyers.
Download Bizagi vs. WorkflowGen Report
Bizagi offers competitive setup costs, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are typically higher, reflecting their broader feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Bizagi offers competitive setup costs, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are typically higher, reflecting their broader feature set.
WorkflowGen Logo
Mendix
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Mendix
4.1 out of 5
Mendix suits those seeking drag-and-drop capability and integration flexibility. In comparison, WorkflowGen's advanced process automation and detailed workflow customization are advantageous. Mendix excels in deployment and customer service ease, while WorkflowGen's higher initial costs are justified by long-term benefits.
Download Mendix vs. WorkflowGen Report
Mendix has a higher setup cost compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more cost-effective initial choice.
View comparison
Pricing
Mendix has a higher setup cost compared to WorkflowGen, making WorkflowGen a more cost-effective initial choice.
WorkflowGen Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Bonita
4.1 out of 5
Bonita excels in integration simplicity ideal for budget-conscious buyers, focusing on competitive pricing and seamless adaptability. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers superior modeling flexibility and structured support, appealing to larger enterprises seeking advanced features and justifying a higher investment with enhanced ROI potential.
Download Bonita vs. WorkflowGen Report
Bonita has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while WorkflowGen involves higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Bonita has lower setup costs, making it more budget-friendly, while WorkflowGen involves higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced capabilities.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
Nintex Process Platform
3.9 out of 5
Nintex offers ease of use with drag-and-drop simplicity and robust integration for accessible automation. In comparison, WorkflowGen provides extensive customization and complex workflow support, appealing to enterprises needing detailed process control for tailored process management solutions.
Download Nintex Process Platform vs. WorkflowGen Report
Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost, while WorkflowGen offers a more affordable setup. These pricing differences highlight varying initial investment expectations between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost, while WorkflowGen offers a more affordable setup. These pricing differences highlight varying initial investment expectations between the two platforms.
WorkflowGen Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen stands out for its ease of use and quick deployment. In comparison, Studio Creatio excels with comprehensive features and higher long-term value. WorkflowGen's cost-effectiveness appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Studio Creatio is preferred for its extensive customization and superior customer service.
Download Studio Creatio vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Studio Creatio, which offers more budget-friendly options.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a higher setup cost compared to Studio Creatio, which offers more budget-friendly options.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service
4.0 out of 5

WorkflowGen excels in intuitive design and seamless integration. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service offers extensive customization and robust data management. WorkflowGen is ideal for those seeking ease of use, while Oracle attracts enterprises requiring advanced customization and flexibility.

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, with significant differences influencing the initial investment required.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, with significant differences influencing the initial investment required.
WorkflowGen Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
3.9 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
SS&C Blue Prism
3.9 out of 5

WorkflowGen appeals with pricing and fast returns, offering customizable workflows and ease of use. In comparison, SS&C Blue Prism justifies higher costs with advanced features and extensive integration, making it ideal for complex automation needs, emphasizing long-term ROI.

Download SS&C Blue Prism vs. WorkflowGen Report
WorkflowGen offers cost-effective setup options, while SS&C Blue Prism tends to have higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
WorkflowGen offers cost-effective setup options, while SS&C Blue Prism tends to have higher initial costs.
WorkflowGen Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
KiSSFLOW attracts users with its intuitive drag-and-drop interface and easy setup using pre-built templates. In comparison, WorkflowGen offers advanced customization and robust integration for complex workflows. KiSSFLOW is cost-effective for straightforward needs, while WorkflowGen provides long-term ROI through extensive capabilities.
Download KiSSFLOW vs. WorkflowGen Report
KiSSFLOW's setup costs are minimal and more affordable, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are higher and may be less budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
KiSSFLOW's setup costs are minimal and more affordable, while WorkflowGen's setup costs are higher and may be less budget-friendly.
WorkflowGen Logo
Zoho Creator
4.3 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Zoho Creator
4.3 out of 5
Zoho Creator offers easy customization and a drag-and-drop interface, making it ideal for rapid application building. In comparison, WorkflowGen provides robust workflow automation and advanced integration features. Zoho Creator is budget-friendly, while WorkflowGen, although pricier, delivers strong ROI through comprehensive capabilities.
Download WorkflowGen vs. Zoho Creator Report
Zoho Creator has a low setup cost with easy onboarding, while WorkflowGen requires a higher setup investment but provides robust customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
Zoho Creator has a low setup cost with easy onboarding, while WorkflowGen requires a higher setup investment but provides robust customization options.
WorkflowGen Logo
Jitterbit Vinyl
4.4 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
Jitterbit Vinyl
4.4 out of 5
Jitterbit Vinyl offers user-friendly integration tools and extensive connectivity options. In comparison, WorkflowGen provides dynamic form generation and comprehensive task management. Jitterbit Vinyl needs system customization and reporting enhancements. WorkflowGen requires better mobile app support. Jitterbit Vinyl features cost-effective pricing; WorkflowGen justifies a higher price with robust features.
Download Jitterbit Vinyl vs. WorkflowGen Report
Jitterbit Vinyl offers a transparent setup cost structure, while WorkflowGen requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Jitterbit Vinyl offers a transparent setup cost structure, while WorkflowGen requires a higher initial investment.
WorkflowGen Logo
CMW Tracker
4.8 out of 5
WorkflowGen Logo
CMW Tracker
4.8 out of 5
CMW Tracker offers flexibility and customization ideal for tailored workflows, with a straightforward deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, WorkflowGen excels in advanced automation and integration, justifying its higher cost with comprehensive solutions and responsive support, appealing to those with complex process needs.
Download CMW Tracker vs. WorkflowGen Report
CMW Tracker offers competitive setup costs, providing a budget-friendly entry point, while WorkflowGen typically incorporates a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
CMW Tracker offers competitive setup costs, providing a budget-friendly entry point, while WorkflowGen typically incorporates a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
WorkflowGen Logo
WorkflowGen Logo
TIBCO Cloud Live Apps
1 out of 5
TIBCO Cloud Live Apps is a low-code application platform that enables Citizen Developers to turn an idea into a business application with no code. Using an intuitive Case Management approach the Citizen Developer can create applications that have enough structure to meet business needs but are flexible enough to not constrain them in the way they want to use it. Some subscriptions to Live Apps also include capabilities from the Integration domain meaning the Citizen Developer can create applications that integrate and interact with a wide range of Enterprise data systems on cloud or on-premise.
View comparison

Related categories

Business Process Design
Business Process Management (BPM)
Process Automation