Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs WorkflowGen comparison

ActiveBatch by Redwood and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ActiveBatch by Redwood is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.4, while WorkflowGen is ranked #43. ActiveBatch by Redwood holds a 0.7% mindshare in PA, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.
ActiveBatch by Redwood
Read 35 ActiveBatch by Redwood reviews
  • 2,095 Views
  • 524 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
WorkflowGen
Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews
  • 466 Views
  • 112 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

WorkflowGen and ActiveBatch by Redwood are both in the workflow automation and management space. Data shows that WorkflowGen is preferred for pricing and support, while ActiveBatch by Redwood holds an advantage in features.

Features: WorkflowGen's key strengths include customizable workflows, seamless application integration, and robust support. ActiveBatch by Redwood provides powerful automation capabilities such as advanced scheduling, extensive process support, and versatile automation tools, making it a comprehensive solution for complex needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WorkflowGen is recognized for its easy deployment and responsive customer service that suit businesses looking for quick setups. ActiveBatch by Redwood requires a more complex deployment process but offers strong customer service to support its advanced features.

Pricing and ROI: WorkflowGen is a cost-effective option with quick ROI due to lower setup costs, attracting budget-conscious buyers. ActiveBatch by Redwood, requiring a higher initial investment, is seen as beneficial for those prioritizing long-term strategic investments in advanced automation.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. WorkflowGen
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ActiveBatch by Redwood
Ranking in Process Automation
9th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Workload Automation (9th)
WorkflowGen
Ranking in Process Automation
43rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (30th), Business Process Management (BPM) (51st), Rapid Application Development Software (37th), Low-Code Development Platforms (47th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ActiveBatch by Redwood is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Shubham Bharti - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible, easy to use, and offers good automation
Occasionally, I find myself contemplating if there is room for improvement in the user interface (UI), and envisioning that with certain enhancements. The UI could potentially offer a more refined and user-friendly experience, fostering smoother interactions and facilitating easier navigation for users engaging with the application. New users might encounter a minor setback due to the absence of readily accessible training videos, which could have otherwise proven to be an invaluable resource in aiding their initial familiarization with the platform, potentially hindering their seamless onboarding process and delaying their ability to harness the software's full range of capabilities to its utmost potential.
Read full review
CO
Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable
We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The software offers real-time monitoring and reporting features that let IT teams keep tabs on the progress of their batch operations and workflows."
"Approximately ~20 hours of manual effort have been reduced to ~5 hours with the help of ActiveBatch."
"The REST API adapters and native integrations for integrating and orchestrating the software stack are very flexible."
"From a scheduling point of view, it is pretty good."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is the versatility of the prebuilt jobs."
"Easy to configure and simple to develop new features."
"One of the valuable features is the ability to trigger workflows, one after another, based on success, without having to worry about overlapping workflows. The ability to integrate our BI, analytics, and our data quality jobs is also valuable"
"Using this tool, if there are any huge failures, we immediately get an email notification, and the proper team will be informed, at which time they can act accordingly."
More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
 

Cons

"As more organizations are moving towards a cloud-based infrastructure, ActiveBatch could incorporate more capabilities that support popular cloud platforms, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud."
"The help center and documentation are not that helpful."
"The product should be improved by providing a customization option."
"The documentation is very limited, and it can be improved."
"It does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex. You have to learn how it does things. I don't know if it's any worse than any other tool would be, just because of the nature of what it does... the learning curve is the hardest part."
"Between version 10 and version 12 there was a change. In version 10, they had each object in its own folder. But on the back end, they saw it at the root level. So when we moved over to version 12, everything was in the same area mixed together. It was incredibly difficult and we actually had to create our own folders and move those objects—like schedules, jobs, user accounts—and manually put those into folders, whereas the previous version already had it."
"One thing I've noticed is that navigation can be difficult unless you are familiar with the structure that we have in place. If someone else had to look at our ActiveBatch console and find a job, they might not know where to find it."
"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."
More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."
"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."
"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."
"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."
"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."
"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."
"It allows for lower operational overhead."
"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Insurance Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
Managing the workload and monitoring the tasks were very difficult with manual interventions. Now, by using ActiveBatch, the process is automated and it runs tasks on a scheduled basis.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
I'd advise users to start by knowing what the actual requirement is and thoroughly assess the automation needs. New users should take advantage of the demos and trial versions so they get an idea o...
See all answers
What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?
After upgrades we are facing a few issues and errors triggered, so focusing on this would be appreciated. Some of the advanced features in the user interface are a bit confusing even after referrin...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 17% of the time
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 12% of the time
AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 10% of the time
Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Redwood RunMyJobs vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 10% of the time
Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood Logo
Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood
Compared 9% of the time
More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors
Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen
Compared 52% of the time
TIBCO Cloud Live Apps vs WorkflowGen Logo
TIBCO Cloud Live Apps vs WorkflowGen
Compared 48% of the time
More WorkflowGen Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ActiveBatch by Redwood
July 2025
ActiveBatch by Redwood reportDownload ActiveBatch by Redwood product report
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
June 2025
WorkflowGen reportDownload WorkflowGen product report
 

Also Known As

ActiveBatch
No data available
 

Overview

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?
  • Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
  • Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
  • Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
  • Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
  • Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
  • Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.
What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?
  • Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
  • Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
  • Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
  • Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen
 

Sample Customers

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital
Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
Buyer's Guide
ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. WorkflowGen
July 2025
Free Report: ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. WorkflowGen
Find out what your peers are saying about ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ActiveBatch by Redwood vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.