We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 38th in Rapid Application Development Software. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Mendix, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our GitHub CoPilot vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
