Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub CoPilot vs WorkflowGen comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
WorkflowGen
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
36th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (29th), Business Process Management (BPM) (45th), Process Automation (44th), Low-Code Development Platforms (43rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 6.1%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot6.1%
WorkflowGen0.5%
Other93.4%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.
CO
Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable
We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"In terms of understanding user queries and providing code that aligns with my expectations, there is room for improvement."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"I can upload code snippets or class files and ask for solutions to improve them, which works well. It's a great productivity tool that saves me time searching websites. While there are alternatives like ChatGPT and other AI tools, the advantage of the tool is that it is built into the IDE."
"The most valuable skill and characteristic of GitHub CoPilot is that you can find any information in seconds."
"Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs."
"The CoPilot app that you can use while creating presentations is very useful."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
 

Cons

"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."
"I don't have enough experience to share this kind of feedback."
"It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"They could enhance the product's accuracy of suggestions, especially when dealing with non-standard or legacy code."
"The tool must improve its ability to work with multiple files."
"They could improve the product in terms of integration with other tools."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's affordable."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"The solution is costly."
"GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The product has a tiered pricing model that starts with a free version for individual developers but requires a separate license fee for enterprise use."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
I honestly don't have a clue about how much we usually pay for GitHub CoPilot because the increase in license costs is managed by another team, and I am not the administrator, so I generally don't ...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
The areas of GitHub CoPilot that need improvement include the ability to debug, which is applicable to AI-driven tools that allow you to code, and to understand our application better and learn fro...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.