Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GitHub CoPilot vs WorkflowGen comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (2nd)
WorkflowGen
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
37th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (29th), Business Process Management (BPM) (54th), Process Automation (40th), Low-Code Development Platforms (33rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 5.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

TarunRevalla - PeerSpot reviewer
Saves time with context-aware code suggestions and seamless integration
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable suggestions where applicable. There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen. I also run many automations within GitHub. When an NPR is raised, it automatically provides suggestions, which is part of the enterprise edition without limitations. While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections. If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load.
CO
Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable
We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable skill and characteristic of GitHub CoPilot is that you can find any information in seconds."
"The platform's most valuable feature is its code suggestion capability, which leverages AI to provide context-aware suggestions."
"The platform's most valuable feature is detecting and suggesting variables based on the existing file context."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"I use it almost like a search engine, but it goes a step beyond."
"The solution increases coding efficiency."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
 

Cons

"If the tool could focus on specific lines where changes are suggested, it would save time and reduce server load."
"One drawback is that the solution sometimes suggests unwanted code, especially if I accidentally press the tab. This doesn't happen often. Sometimes it seems to understand my code, but other times it doesn't. This inconsistency is confusing."
"There are no extensions provided by the product for Eclipse."
"It would be useful if we could use the solution to create documents, not only prompts."
"I don't have enough experience to share this kind of feedback."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"While I don't see immediate room for improvement, one suggestion is for Copilot to provide specific suggestions for certain lines of code instead of rewriting entire sections."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
"Each user needs their license, whether it's a big team or a small team."
"The pricing for GitHub Copilot is around ten dollars per month."
"GitHub CoPilot is less expensive than other solutions."
"The solution is costly."
"We have a demo license. Once we understand what we'll do, we'll start with a paid license."
"There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
"GitHub Copilot is a paid service, costing approximately $6 per month. There might be a free trial available."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?
They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change. The pricing aligns with other AI agents like Chargebee and Anthropic Cloud. The ability to switch between m...
What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?
In terms of improvements for Copilot, I haven't considered much since it offers many useful interactions. It integrates well with GitHub repositories, tracks changes on PRs, and provides valuable s...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub CoPilot vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.