The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SnapLogic | 3.4% |
| Microsoft Azure Logic Apps | 13.1% |
| Boomi iPaaS | 12.4% |
| Other | 71.1% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) | Sep 16, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Sep 16, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | SnapLogic vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps | Sep 16, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | SnapLogic vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform | Sep 16, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | SnapLogic vs SAP Cloud Platform | Sep 16, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camunda | 4.1 | N/A | 89% | 77 interviewsAdd to research |
| Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) | 4.0 | N/A | 93% | 186 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 84 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 69 |
| Large Enterprise | 463 |
SnapLogic was previously known as DataFlow.
Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use SnapLogic for data migration and integration, especially with SAP data, due to its user-friendly interface. While it excels in agility, improving AI capabilities would enhance usability. For enterprise projects, I still prefer DBT. |
| Head of Data Practice at a tech consulting company with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I primarily use SnapLogic for data integration and some API tasks. I value its reusability and pre-delivered snaps, alongside its effective process control. Compared to MuleSoft, SnapLogic is cheaper and simpler, with responsive support for additional features. |
| Technical Specialist App Development at Birlasoft IndiaLtd. | 4.0 | I've used SnapLogic for over three years and found it user-friendly, scalable, and effective for integrating systems and automating processes, though some connectors need improvement. It's evolving into AI and API capabilities, which is promising for future use. |
| Architect at VTR | 4.5 | As a solution architect, I recommended SnapLogic for its efficient connectors and quick data handling, although its limited connector variety and lack of customization present challenges for complex integrations. Despite some limitations, it proved effective for simpler, rapid setups. |
| Integration developer at Blackwoods | 2.5 | I found SnapLogic user-friendly and easier to debug than Boomi, but it lacks comprehensive solutions. The support needs improvement, especially in technical knowledge. While it's a cost-effective option for basic cloud integration, I prefer Boomi for more complex tasks. |
| Solution Architect at X-Press Feeders | 1.0 | We used SnapLogic for building an EDI pipeline for integration, converting EDI to JSON in our company. Despite its utility, SnapLogic requires setup changes for new EDI versions. Previously, we used MapForce and briefly considered Jitterbit before developing an internal tool. |
| System Engineer at Intelizign Engineering Services | 4.5 | In my experience with SnapLogic, it's effective for data integration and migration, especially for flat files to databases. While useful features like CSV and XML parsers are beneficial, the lack of a free version and on-premises option are drawbacks. |
| Senior Software Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
