Camunda vs WorkflowGen comparison

Camunda and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while WorkflowGen is ranked #29. Camunda holds a 10.6% mindshare in BPD, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

21,608 Views
6,050 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

605 Views
157 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Camunda

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Camunda and WorkflowGen are competing products in the business process management category. Camunda has the upper hand in pricing and support, while WorkflowGen stands out for its features.

Features: Camunda offers flexibility through its open-source framework, extensive process automation capabilities, and comprehensive integration support. It provides excellent scalability suited for diverse environments. WorkflowGen includes an advanced form designer, robust workflow engine, and user-friendly interface, designed for business users seeking ready-to-use solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda provides flexible deployment, supporting cloud and on-premise setups, with community-driven support enhancing user satisfaction. WorkflowGen's deployment is straightforward, with dedicated customer support ensuring a smooth setup experience.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers lower setup costs with its open-source model, appealing to businesses focused on cost-effectiveness and customization potential. WorkflowGen's higher initial investment is justified by its extensive features, offering long-term value and dedicated support.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. WorkflowGen

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,846 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

2nd

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Business Process Design

29th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

45th

Ranking in Process Automation

44th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (36th), Low-Code Development Platforms (44th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 10.6%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	10.6%
WorkflowGen	0.4%
Other	89.0%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

"It is an absolutely stable solution."

"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."

"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."

"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."

"The use of Java is a big plus for our intern developers, and Camunda scales well, as many of our departments are already using it in production with dedicated teams."

"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."

More Camunda pros

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

Cons

"The latency of API could be decreased."

"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."

"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

"The setup process is a drawback as it has many dependencies, which affects our ability to migrate to Windows eleven due to security concerns."

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."

"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."

"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."

More Camunda cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"The open-source version of the product is free to use."

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 45% of the time

TIBCO Cloud Live Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 32% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs WorkflowGen

Compared 23% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

November 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

October 2025

Download WorkflowGen product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

WorkflowGen

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. WorkflowGen

November 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors, best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, and best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.