Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

OutSystems OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

OutSystems is #3 ranked solution in top Mobile Development Platforms, #8 ranked solution in top Low-Code Development Platforms, and #10 ranked solution in top Rapid Application Development Software. PeerSpot users give OutSystems an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. OutSystems is most commonly compared to Microsoft Power Apps: OutSystems vs Microsoft Power Apps. OutSystems is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 60% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 21% of all views.
OutSystems Buyer's Guide

Download the OutSystems Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: September 2022

What is OutSystems?
OutSystems is the number one platform for low-code rapid application development. Thousands of customers worldwide trust OutSystems as only solution that combines the power of low-code development with advanced mobile capabilities, enabling visual development of entire application portfolios that easily integrate with existing systems.
OutSystems Customers
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
OutSystems Video

OutSystems Pricing Advice

What users are saying about OutSystems pricing:
  • "I think the pricing for OutSystems is comparable with similar solutions. I would place it somewhere in the middle. We pay for the bundle and don't pay anything extra in terms of licensing and other fees."
  • "I believe they are very strict with their pricing platforms, or the pricing policies, and it changes."
  • "OutSystems is a good solution, but it's not cheap."
  • "It's not cheap. It's pretty expensive."
  • "The subscription is billed on a yearly basis."
  • OutSystems Reviews

    Filter by:
    Filter Reviews
    Industry
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Company Size
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Job Level
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Rating
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Considered
    Loading...
    Filter Unavailable
    Order by:
    Loading...
    • Date
    • Highest Rating
    • Lowest Rating
    • Review Length
    Search:
    Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
    Harikrishnan  Ramamoorthy - PeerSpot reviewer
    Technical Lead at Netlink Software Group America Inc
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    Helps with validation, offers good features, and is reliable
    Pros and Cons
    • "We can do the validation before calling the API."
    • "Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."

    What is our primary use case?

    It is kind of used for reactive and web applications. We're also working on the mobile applications as well. I use it in a banking environment. 

    I've been onboarded there and then I'm just doing the activities for both internet banking as well as mobile banking, handling both servers as well as the front end.

    Currently, this banking application can consist of both mobile as well as internet banking. We have it for eight different countries. For mobile, we have eight different applications, and for internet banking, it is a single application, however, it'll support eight entities in eight countries including Bahrain, the UK, Iraq, et cetera.

    What is most valuable?

    Normally we use it in a banking setup. Usually, transfer payment and then the benefits pay gateway, are those kinds of integrations we are doing currently for mobile. The onboarding process we do, the login for that process, et cetera, offer good features. 

    We have one feature called multiple payments where we're able to select multiple beneficiaries and we're able to create ad hoc beneficiaries. Ad hoc beneficiaries mean there's no need to add the benefits directly. We can enter the beneficiary upon the number and we can do the payment. We can add multiple beneficiaries in a single go and then we will do the validation. 

    We have a back office application as well where we can configure based upon the user as well as based upon the segment. We can configure per day.

    We're able to do transformations. We can do the validation before calling the API. Once validation is done, we will show the set of validation. Either it can be the OTP validation or it can be a token validation. Once that is done, we can call the final API, which calls the code banking system for doing the payments.

    What needs improvement?

    We've acquired a new bank and would like to integrate e-services into the offering. We'd like to be able to have an option for doing an activation directly from the internet banking area so that there is no need to contact the bank directly. Having e-services capabilities would be ideal. 

    There are a lot of enhancements and new features coming.

    Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications. We're hoping that will come in the new release. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've been using the solution for 3.5 years. 

    Buyer's Guide
    OutSystems
    September 2022
    Learn what your peers think about OutSystems. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2022.
    633,572 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    It's stable enough. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution is scalable. If I want to do any changes or anything, it has a one-click publish. There's no need to re-upload anything. We make changes, we expand, and it is a one-click deployment.

    Currently, in Bahrain alone, there are 40,000 users on the app. We have the same for other countries as well. We have deployed more production for three entities - Bahrain, Egypt, and the UK. Currently, for the other three entities, it is in progress. We are planning to move those changes at the end of September.

    We can add users as necessary. In LifeTime, we're able to handle user management. We're able to create a set of users and we can assign roles. It can be an admin role, like full control where it's able to do publishing, feedbacking, everything. We can receive a set of users and control access to certain areas. 

    How are customer service and support?

    Technical support is very good. If there is any production issue or anything, we can raise the ticket and they're immediately helping. If there are any deployment changes that get affected, it means we have control of all directions also. Therefore, we can manage everything properly, without any effect, actually. Everything is completely handed down to OutSystems and it is more stable. If any deployment causes us an issue we can revert back to the older version and it'll work fine.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Before that, I used a server platform called Forti. It is similar to the OutSystems Platform. We were able to use mobile and web publications and able to create using that.

    I worked on an AD platform as well. 

    Comparatively, I'm able to see OutSystems is very easy to maintain and easily fulfills the business requirements. 

    How was the initial setup?

    The deployment and process depends upon the model we are selecting. Normally consider if we are selecting big models, it'll take around 30 to 40 minutes for making a deployment to set up 15 applications. For example, if it is a mobile application, it means if we can select only the application, it will take a maximum of five to ten minutes for creating the solution and deploying in the UIT of production. For internet banking, we use Windows authentication, ID logins. For mobile banking, we used third-party APIs. We used common plugins for the camera location and everything. We integrated with Apple, Google, and Apple Wallet also.

    Everything is completely handled in OutSystems, so we have a LifeTime available in OutSystems. Previously, we don't have LifeTime so we manually exported the solution and we deployed it in the UIT. With the help of LifeTime, we're able to see the versions and the differences. We can select the proper particular application and we can do the deployment. It is easy to maintain and easy to deploy as well.

    What about the implementation team?

    For doing the deployments, any changes, are completely handled on our side.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I'm not sure how the licensing is set up. I don't handle that aspect.

    However, I am able to see it s very costly as compared to other platforms. That said, we see the benefit of paying so much. They provide a lot of options. 

    What other advice do I have?

    While we use version 11.10.20 for service, the service center for LifeTime is 11.0. Currently, we need to upgrade that. The upgrade plan is in progress. We have had to start recently.

    I'd recommend the solution to others. 

    I would rate it eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Owner at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
    Real User
    Top 10
    Versatile with great scalability and great technical support
    Pros and Cons
    • "There is literally a ton of stuff it can do. It's very flexible."
    • "The solution is costly."

    What is our primary use case?

    One of our clients is a union, like a labor union, and therefore they're using it to develop an engagement-type app, for member engagement applications.

    What is most valuable?

    Overall, it's a very nice solution.

    The fact that you can run it on a lot of platforms is great. The client's goal is to create a mobile application that a lot of platforms, a lot of the old enterprise type platforms cannot do. The client wants to create something that you can put in every member's hand to engage with that member. The platform they were using before, for sure, cannot do that. This solution is very versatile in that sense.

    There is literally a ton of stuff it can do. It's very flexible.

    The scalability is very good.

    The stability is great.

    They have very good technical support.

    You can run it on their cloud platform or you can run it on your own cloud platform. It's your choice where you run it. If you don't like their cloud, then you can go to somebody else's cloud and run it there and they will install it on there for you.

    What needs improvement?

    The solution is costly.

    The solution is still very new to me, and it's therefore hard for me to discuss missing features. I'm still learning and discovering.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I haven't been using the solution for that long. It's very new to me. It's likely been about two short months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The stability is very good. I haven't run into any issues at all. The performance is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's great.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution is much better suited to enterprise-level organizations.

    The product is definitely scalable. You can go from, for example, 10 users to a million users. It's just a matter of how much hardware you put behind it. Everything runs on the cloud. Therefore, you just keep throwing more memory, more disc space, more processing power, et cetera. It's not a problem.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Tech support is very good. They have online support and they have a support number as well that you can call. You can initiate a support case and they usually get back to you probably within three to four hours, maximum. They are very, very helpful and responsive. We are quite satisfied with the level of service.

    How was the initial setup?

    I didn't do the setup myself. That was actually done by OutSystems. I can't speak to how easy or difficult the process is, or how long the deployment takes. I don't have any insights in that sense.

    What about the implementation team?

    We had OutSystems handle the installation for us. We did not handle the process on our own.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The cost of the product is very high and would price out smaller organizations.

    My client pays for the solution. Therefore, I have no visibility of the cost. I can't speak to the licensing or the pricing, or the terms of use.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We've also looked at Mendix and Vinyl. We looked at Gartner and compared them with this product.

    What other advice do I have?

    I'm an external consultant. I have a few different clients. I have no relationship OutSystems directly.

    I played a little bit with OutSystems. I have one of my other clients on an OutSystems user. I'm in the process of just learning. I am trying it out. I have a computer consultant that is helping me. There are certain things that I'm looking at, in general. 

    The OutSystems platform is really nice, however, it's very expensive for small to medium-sized businesses. I have one customer that's an enterprise-sized organization that can afford OutSystems, however, there are a lot of my other clients that are not that large. Vinyl might be a better solution for them.

    I'd recommend the solution, however, I would suggest those considering the solution to do their homework first. Look at Gartner and other opinions. Understand what you are getting into, and then decide.

    I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    OutSystems
    September 2022
    Learn what your peers think about OutSystems. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2022.
    633,572 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Technology Manager at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
    Real User
    Top 10
    Intuitive to use and provides good mobile support
    Pros and Cons
    • "I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy."
    • "Since we first started using OutSystems, they switched their language support from Java and .NET to .NET only, which was a bit of a surprise. Their language support could be better in this sense, although on our resource side it is now a bit more flexible."

    What is our primary use case?

    We have used OutSystems to develop a simple portal in the cloud. This portal is mainly for internal use and not for actual customers or external users.

    It's generally not for daily usage, so there's only a small team that uses OutSystems as their primary tool in their day-to-day work, but because it's open for any and all kinds of developers, there are probably hundreds of users throughout our organization.

    What is most valuable?

    I like the mobile features the most, and there are also various features around the portal we created that I enjoy.

    What needs improvement?

    We're still pretty new to OutSystems, though it has become apparent to us that, even though it's a so-called low-code platform, there are still some things that require a programmer. For example, you don't really need a lot of programming skill to work with OutSystems, but if you want to do something that's a bit more 'feature-ish', then you still need some programming experience.

    Since we first started using OutSystems, they switched their language support from Java and .NET to .NET only, which was a bit of a surprise. Their language support could be better in this sense, although on our resource side it is now a bit more flexible.

    On the whole, most of the features that we've required are all there. But there are some upcoming features that we are looking forward to. For example, the AI modules. They also have third-party vendors that produce different connectors, but I am hoping that OutSystems itself will start to create more innovative connectors or complementary solutions that we will find of use.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using OutSystems in our organization for about one and a half years now.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    So far there have been no major issues so I would say it's pretty stable. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We haven't yet reached the level that we need to seriously consider scaling, but from my experience it isn't so easy to scale any kind of closed platform where you start without the source. They may offer you the source later when migrating, but it's generally not so easy to queue up onto another platform or move to another vendor, so I expect that the scalability in this respect might be lower than we would like.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    So far, most of our support is coming from internal sectors of our organization. I think it's easy enough to resolve all the issues we come across within the company.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We do use another similar product which isn't very well-known. It's a product from Germany and we use it mainly for internal use in the same way that we use OutSystems.

    Comparatively, as a low-code kind of platform, OutSystems is the most intuitive to use, but if you have an experienced programmer in Java and .NET like myself, then the other platform is probably a bit more flexible.

    How was the initial setup?

    It's basically a simple portal that we developed in-house.

    What about the implementation team?

    The implementation details really depend on the project and the type of organization. For example, because we are quite a sizeable organization, there are other processes that we need to fulfill in order to maintain compliance before we push our projects to go live. Thus, for us, the full implementation took about six months. Thankfully, the maintenance is pretty low.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I think the pricing for OutSystems is comparable with similar solutions. I would place it somewhere in the middle. We pay for the bundle and don't pay anything extra in terms of licensing and other fees.

    What other advice do I have?

    I recommend OutSystems, but I would also point out to others that they're not the only product out there that deserves attention.

    I would rate OutSystems an eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud

    If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

    Other
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Head of Innovation & Projects at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
    Real User
    Top 20
    Intuitive, simple to use, and effective, but support could be improved
    Pros and Cons
    • "It is easy to use."
    • "In my opinion, the support and the pricing could be better."

    What is our primary use case?

    We are a financial institution, and our primary credit solution is developed in OutSystems. We have several small apps, not for mobiles, but apps that are developed to support our core business, which is factoring and credit.

    What is most valuable?

    It is easy to use.

    What needs improvement?

    In my opinion, the support and the pricing could be better.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been working with OutSystems for seven or eight years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    OutSystems is a stable solution.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    OutSystems is scalable.

    In terms of the solution, we went through some minor escalations. It was simple to manage. We have also added some redundancy to our app server, which was simple to set up.

    Our company is still small, with a staff of about 50 people. I believe ten of them are developers. They develop, operate, administrate all systems platforms and deployed applications. The remainder, are business units.

    How are customer service and support?

    The SLA should be improved. The response time could be improved.

    How was the initial setup?

    I can't say for certain that it was simple. It was simple for us. Because I have an experienced manager who manages our team, it was simple for him to set that up.

    It took some time because we were building a core banking service system from scratch. What we did in OutSystems, aside from setting up all of the licenses and the platform itself, was that we had help because it was the early days of the company. OutSystems in Portugal assisted us with this. However, because the solution was created from scratch, it takes a long time to deploy it with the business solution.

    What about the implementation team?

    I manage a development team that develops and maintains DevOps. Within that team of developers, I add one who leads the team that also handles all of the tool's administration.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I believe they are very strict with their pricing platforms, or the pricing policies, and it changes. They have changed it from software units to application objects in recent years, and now it's all free, but you pay for the users. 

    I believe they should have a better scheme for companies like ours, which are small and could benefit from the platform without paying too much.

    The fees are approximately €150,000, €170,000 per year, which is excessive for a company of our size.

    We don't have any additional costs, but we did have, within this price we had some, I believe we have some agreements regarding accelerator, to be honest, I don't know off the top of my head.

    What other advice do I have?

    They should have OutSystems support with the setup and structuring of the best pricing for the goal that they want to assign to the solutions. Because of the pricing, if you want to use OutSystems for self or internal solutions, it would be very different, but it could be very expensive if you want to develop things for the outside, which would require users and business management. I believe they should receive support directly from OutSystems or through a vendor. I'm not sure which is preferable. However, OutSystems support is required for installation.

    I would rate OutSystems a seven out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Somnath-Ghosh - PeerSpot reviewer
    Solution Architect and LowCode Practice Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
    Real User
    Top 5Leaderboard
    It has connectors for different enterprise apps and solid reporting capabilities
    Pros and Cons
    • "The architecture of OutSystems is quite simple, and the features are similar to Mendix's. OutSystems has connectors for different enterprise apps and solid reporting capabilities. You can also integrate with any content management platform like SharePoint or Adobe Enterprise Manager, or something like that. You can also create and integrate workflows."
    • "We'd like OutSystems to add stronger workflow-based automation similar to what Appian offers. It needs more workflow modeling and RPA features."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use OutSystems for the same purpose as Mendix, but we recommend Mendix for mobile applications and OutSystems for B2C or B2B web portals. OutSystems has strong features for creating web-based portals or eCommerce marketplaces.

    Mendix supports Java, while OutSystems supports .NET. We are using the latest versions of OutSystems. We are partnered with Mendix and OutSystems. We have access to their partner portal, so we don't need to worry about developing applications, proofs of concept, or prototypes using OutSystems.

    OutSystems has on-premise and cloud versions. It can be deployed on AWS, Azure, or GCP. OutSystems is available as a Platform-as-a-Service, as well. OutSystems can be hosted on Azure, GCP, or AWS, and you can deploy OutSystems components on OutSystems PaaS. 

    What is most valuable?

    The architecture of OutSystems is quite simple, and the features are similar to Mendix's. OutSystems has connectors for different enterprise apps and solid reporting capabilities. You can also integrate with any content management platform like SharePoint or Adobe Enterprise Manager, or something like that. You can also create and integrate workflows. 

    What needs improvement?

    We'd like OutSystems to add stronger workflow-based automation similar to what Appian offers. It needs more workflow modeling and RPA features.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using OutSystems for the last three years.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Like Mendix, OutSystems has a highly scalable and flexible architecture. 

    How are customer service and support?

    We are an OutSystems partner, so I have an excellent rapport with alliance managers and their technical architecture team and technical support. They're incredibly supportive. I rate OutSystems eight out of 10. 

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We are using almost all the local solutions, including OutSystems, Mendix, Appian, etc.

    How was the initial setup?

    Setting up OutSystems is straightforward. 

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    OutSystems isn't expensive. It's very similar to the cost of Mendix. If customers have a good relationship with OutSystems or Mendix, they can get a better price. The solutions have a similar pricing model, including licenses for single or multiple users.

    What other advice do I have?

    I rate OutSystems nine out of 10. OutSystems is the market leader in the local area space on the Gartner Magic Quadrant. As a user, I can say OutSystems is on par with Mendix, and the features are similar, so now it depends on the use case. 

    For example, some customers prefer Mendix because they have SAP ecosystems, so they will go with Mendix because it offers native SAP support. Mendix has SAP adapters that are all license-free. These are cost reasons people might choose Mendix. However, there are some cases where an SAP might go for OutSystems because the license is a bit cheaper.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Head of Technology & Governance at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 10
    Allows for quick application building, but with a hefty price tag to match
    Pros and Cons
    • "We have no complaints surrounding both the scalability and stability of this solution."
    • "The technical features are good, but the actual commercialization is out of reach."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use OutSystems to analyze disparate applications that are about to become obsolete.

    As we currently can't afford it, we are still in the testing and evaluating phase.

    What is most valuable?

    You can use this solution to build applications very rapidly. It can also easily be deployed on mobile devices and applications as well.

    What needs improvement?

    The biggest challenge for us is the licensing model and the cost of OutSystems. The apps that we are interested in have a very large user-base and OutSystems drastically ramps those costs up.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have dealt with this solution for roughly 18 months.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We have no complaints surrounding both the scalability and stability of this solution.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We use ServiceNow for CMDB and ITSM related needs; we don't use ServiceNow for application development, so for us, the two aren't comparable. I don't have any experience with SericveNow's capabilities in that space. 

    How was the initial setup?

    Our team had no issues with the technical side of the initial setup. Ultimately, they were able to create prototypes and build apps really quickly. But I think where we failed was with the commercial side of it, in terms of the licenses and the costs surrounding deployment.

    I believe our functional labs were up and running within a couple of days; however, we have not deployed it on a wider scale as we can't afford to.

    What about the implementation team?

    Our in-house team of one or two people took care of everything.

    What other advice do I have?

    OutSystems is a good solution, but it's not cheap. 

    On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of five. The technical features are good, but the actual commercialization is out of reach.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud
    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Master Collator at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 20
    Effective, easy to use and set up, great community support but the technical support an price could be improved
    Pros and Cons
    • "We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications."
    • "We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customized to improve this."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use the product for developing applications.

    How has it helped my organization?

    It improved our output, mostly in the reactive and mobile applications we developed. 

    What is most valuable?

    We used almost all of the features, themes, styling guide, and approach components. They are useful in our applications. 

    What needs improvement?

    Technical support could be better, and out-of-the-box performance could be improved. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using OutSystems for five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    We had some lagging issues under high data loads, and the solution needed to be customised to improve this.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution is scalable.

    How are customer service and support?

    Technical support would get a three out of five, as there is some wait time involved and some solutions were not adequate. This is an area for improvement. 

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We previously used Darknet but switched to OutSystems because it offered some more tools and features.

    How was the initial setup?

    Setup was easy and there are a lot of forums to help, I would rate it five out of five in that respect. 

    What about the implementation team?

    We had an in-house setup, requiring only one person.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    It depends on the use case, but we found the solution to be pretty expensive.

    What other advice do I have?

    Setup is easy, the solution is also easy to learn and there is a lot of community support on forums to help. Aside from the cost, OutSystems has been good for us. I would rate OutSystems a seven out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Hybrid Cloud
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Director of Web Solutions at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
    MSP
    Top 20
    Easy to set up, low maintenance, good support, and it integrates well
    Pros and Cons
    • "The technical support is perfect."
    • "The prices should be lower. It is a little bit too high for a small market."

    What is our primary use case?

    We are a reseller and OutSystems is one of the products that we provide to our customers.

    What is most valuable?

    OutSystems allows you to do things really quickly.

    This product requires very little maintenance, and it is easy to do as compared to traditional programming solutions.

    What needs improvement?

    The prices should be lower. It is a little bit too high for a small market.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I began working with OutSystems in 2014.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The stability of this product has been incredible. I would rate it a ten out of ten in this aspect.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    We are in a small country and although this is a scalable product, that is not usually an issue for us.

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support is perfect.

    I would rate the technical support a ten out of ten.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing is an area that needs to be improved.

    The subscription is billed on a yearly basis.

    What other advice do I have?

    This is a product that I recommend for anybody who is digitalizing things. It's an incredible tool and you can do things very quickly. Certainly, you should look into it if you are going to implement any kind of application. Whether it is field service, internal applications, external websites, or something else that is related to the digitalization of processes, and where you have to interact with many systems for integration purposes, this is a good tool.

    I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free OutSystems Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: September 2022
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free OutSystems Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.