QuickBase vs WorkflowGen comparison

Quickbase and WorkflowGen are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Quickbase is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.6, while WorkflowGen is ranked #38. Quickbase holds a 1.3% mindshare in RADS, compared to WorkflowGen’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Quickbase users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WorkflowGen users who would recommend it.

QuickBase

Read 75 QuickBase reviews

1,759 Views
470 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

WorkflowGen

Read 3 WorkflowGen reviews

176 Views
63 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QuickBase

WorkflowGen

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Both QuickBase and WorkflowGen are recognized for providing robust workflow management solutions. However, QuickBase garners higher user satisfaction due to its pricing and ease of use, while WorkflowGen is noted for its advanced features which justify its higher price point.

Features: QuickBase is praised for its customizable forms, drag-and-drop interface, and ease of use, making it user-friendly. WorkflowGen excels with advanced process automation, comprehensive feature set, and integration capabilities, offering sophisticated tools.

Room for Improvement: QuickBase users suggest enhancements in reporting capabilities, mobile app functionality, and user interface refinement. WorkflowGen users point out the need for improvements in the initial setup process, documentation clarity, and user training materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QuickBase is often highlighted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. WorkflowGen offers extensive deployment options but is viewed as more challenging to set up, with mixed experiences in customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Users find QuickBase offers a better price-to-value ratio, appreciating its affordability and faster ROI. WorkflowGen users acknowledge the higher costs but believe the rich features justify the investment, despite a slower ROI. The pricing advantage clearly leans towards QuickBase, making it a preferred option for cost-sensitive buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed QuickBase vs. WorkflowGen Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase vs. WorkflowGen

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

QuickBase

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

17th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)

WorkflowGen

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

38th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

46th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (31st), Business Process Management (BPM) (51st), Process Automation (43rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of QuickBase is 1.3%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WorkflowGen is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Bhavatha Ranjanni S

Data Analyst at Global Value Web

Its extensive scope allows multiple users with diverse professional backgrounds to engage on a single platform

When learning QuickBase, I noticed a shift in its cost structure. It operated on a cost-efficient model tied to the number of users, with invoicing based on applicants. The recent changes have increased costs based on user activity, such as viewing reports or interacting with specific fields. This shift makes QuickBase more expensive to use as activity increases. Lowering these costs could potentially broaden QuickBase's user base, similar to how Microsoft PowerApps operates. The visualization in QuickBase could be enhanced. Due to cost and usage efficiency concerns, our utilization of QuickBase is limited within our company. A few individuals are currently utilizing QuickBase. We need to consider the cost-to-usage ratio and prioritize increasing adoption.

Read full review

Christopher Odonoghue

SAP Solution Lead at Johnson & Johnson

Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable

We use this product for many different reasons related to our business We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do. The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically trigger the workflow. This solution needs to be…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."

"The need for little to no code knowledge has been huge."

"The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier."

"It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments."

"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."

"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."

"It has superb ease of use and no code needed to create and build apps and databases."

"Considering factors like functionality and price, the product proves to be worth the investment."

More QuickBase pros

"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."

Cons

"Its UI needs improvement. They should improve it and make it a little bit more modern. We should also be able to have more real-time information that connects with other software platforms. It has an open API, but it doesn't always connect with some of the other platforms that we would like to utilize. These are probably two of the biggest things for us, and hopefully, they will keep ensuring that in the future, they continually build QuickBase to be a little bit more efficient in that regard."

"Access to more standard default layouts and sample builds would be useful, and access to more training on use and flexibility."

"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."

"The dashboard is not organized."

"The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals."

"There is room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness."

"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."

"It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."

More QuickBase cons

"This solution needs to be more customizable."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is probably about 300 per license per person. There is just the licensing cost. There are no additional costs."

"You have to negotiate the price because it varies based on the number of users you have, as well as how much cloud storage space you need."

"The product is cheap when compared to other products."

"The pricing for QuickBase is pretty straightforward, It is based on a per user/per month licensing fee."

"Quickbase is probably not the cheapest app out there. That said, it is worth its weight in gold. There is no other app that I know of in the market today that can do what Quickbase does."

"The solution is expensive and geared toward enterprise-level clients."

"We felt the pricing and licensing for QuickBase were easy enough to understand, fair and competitive."

"The pricing for the tier my company used included ten seats and the subcontractor, amounting to approximately $18,000 USD per year."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

61%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about QuickBase?

The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?

Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QuickBase?

The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs QuickBase

Compared 27% of the time

ServiceNow vs QuickBase

Compared 20% of the time

OutSystems vs QuickBase

Compared 12% of the time

Mendix vs QuickBase

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs QuickBase

Compared 7% of the time

More QuickBase Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 54% of the time

TIBCO Cloud Live Apps vs WorkflowGen

Compared 46% of the time

More WorkflowGen Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase

June 2025

Download QuickBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

June 2025

Download WorkflowGen product report

Also Known As

Quick Base, TSheets

No data available

Overview

Trusted by more than half of the Fortune 100, QuickBase is a low-code platform for building, customizing, and integrating custom business applications. With more than 6,000 customers and 500,000 active users, QuickBase is the technology of choice for organizations that want to empower business users to solve their own challenges while maintaining the governance and security of an enterprise-quality app development system.

Quickbase

Immediately accelerate business process adaptability with fluid workflow automation. Use the WorkflowGen .NET workflow software's low code environment to maximize the efficiency of process designers and developers.

Automate any type of human and system-based enterprise process within a battle-tested infrastructure.

Customize and integrate your workflow apps to meet your requirements in a highly configurable environment.

Engage process participants with a full-featured workflow portal, native mobile apps, and email approvals, or through seamless integration with your own web apps.

Leverage a solution used by Fortune 500 companies for worldwide business-critical applications.

WorkflowGen

Sample Customers

Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office

Comcast, Deloitte, Mitsui & Co Ltd, Sanofi Pasteur, Textron, XL Group. WorkflowGen accelerates business process adaptability in 70 countries for 500+ organizations and 1,000,000 users.

Buyer's Guide

QuickBase vs. WorkflowGen

June 2025

Free Report: QuickBase vs. WorkflowGen

Find out what your peers are saying about QuickBase vs. WorkflowGen and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our QuickBase vs. WorkflowGen report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.