We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward and easy. I would give it a nine out of ten."
"We can scale by increasing the infrastructure which is currently running."
"The solution is stable."
"The integration and design are valuable features."
"It is easy to take a requirement, put it in the code, and deploy it."
"It has an elaborated way to explore the IBM BPM processes."
"I liked its robustness the most. It was a very robust platform in my experience. It seemed like a very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users and hammering at the system."
"Its dashboard is easy to use and very good. It allows us to customize."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Stability wavers. We have some opportunities for improvement in this space, especially as we approach our target volume of a million transactions a day. It is tough, because it is not necessarily the product. It is more around the platform and infrastructure to support it, so the connectivity to the database, web sessions, and reverse proxies in front of that."
"I would like to see the solution be able to interact with other customer software solutions."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"It is a rather thick stack because you have to have WebSphere skills, IBM BPM skills, and an understanding of how the product runs on WebSphere. A lot of this will start to get a lot easier as they put it in containers, which will allow the platform to manage itself in some regards."
"Consider an admin console during deployment. I would like to migrate single instances, not the whole bunch at once."
"The configuration is not that easy, and the initial deployment took three months."
"It is not user-friendly."
"I would say the scalability is very good but it's not perfect. It is much more scalable than it has been in the past but... it does require some work to keep it stable. So that is an area that should be improved."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
Earn 20 points
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 53rd in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our IBM BPM vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.