If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
The licensing costs and pricing model are based on capacity and the license is easy to upgrade.
The price of Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is reasonable.
The licensing costs and pricing model are based on capacity and the license is easy to upgrade.
The price of Dell EMC PowerProtect Data Manager is reasonable.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
It is very expensive. It's a trust based licensing. So that's an ethical challenge.
This solution is less expensive than Veeam for us, although it depends on the customer because we get a great discount.
It is very expensive. It's a trust based licensing. So that's an ethical challenge.
This solution is less expensive than Veeam for us, although it depends on the customer because we get a great discount.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out.
It's priced properly for the market.
Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out.
It's priced properly for the market.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is ideal for SMBs due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers advanced automation and scalability, making it suitable for larger enterprises. Users might prefer Infrascale for easy deployment, while AWS's integration with other AWS services is appealing.
Our licensing fees are billed every four months.
The licensing is based on how much data you have plus what appliances you need.
Our licensing fees are billed every four months.
The licensing is based on how much data you have plus what appliances you need.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides seamless cloud integration, automated orchestration, and continuous replication, ideal for robust cloud environments. In comparison, NAKIVO Backup & Replication focuses on on-premises solutions, offering integration with diverse virtual environments and affordable licensing for small to medium-sized enterprises.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
Organizations use Barracuda Backup for data protection and recovery due to ease of use, reliability, and comprehensive support. It automates backups, ensures data availability, and integrates seamlessly. Users value quick restoration, real-time backups, ransomware protection, scalable storage, but report issues with slow recovery, limited customization, integration challenges, and tech support responsiveness.
There is a free version for Hosts with 2 VMs.
There is a free version for two VMs. I would advise to study the deployment environment well, prior to committing to order a license per host.
There is a free version for Hosts with 2 VMs.
There is a free version for two VMs. I would advise to study the deployment environment well, prior to committing to order a license per host.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
Organizations utilize Carbonite Server for cloud backups and disaster recovery, protecting VMware, vSphere, and vSAN. Managed services offer it as backup-as-a-service for off-site backups. It provides features like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL Granular Restore, known for efficiency. Needs improvement in SSO integration and dashboard design.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products.
We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive.
It's free. The license is included with other NetApp products.
We see a financial value with SnapCenter because we don't have to license Commvault, which is pretty expensive.
