

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Norton Small Business are strong contenders in disaster recovery and security for small businesses, respectively. AWS shines in scalability and robust data replication, making it ideal for enterprises, while Norton Small Business is favored for its ease of use and device protection for smaller enterprises.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides reliable database replication, cost-efficiency through its pay-as-you-go model, and a stable disaster recovery process with instant block replication. Norton Small Business offers antivirus protection, a secure VPN, and a firewall, ensuring comprehensive device security in small business environments.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance automation and user alerts and improve logging for better usability. Norton Small Business faces criticism for upselling, slow cloud backups, and frequent update notifications requiring better integration with mobile platforms.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is adaptable, supporting various environments with highly rated customer service. Norton Small Business is also versatile in deployment but lacks a formal ticketing system, which may hinder tracking issues over time.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is pricey yet offers high ROI due to efficiency in disaster recovery, though storage costs may add up for small businesses. Norton Small Business appeals with affordable yearly licensing, though upselling affects its cost-effectiveness. Despite this, it remains a valuable investment for many users.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 1.3% |
| Norton Small Business | 0.5% |
| Other | 98.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.