

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and IBM Storage Protect are both competitors in disaster recovery and data protection, with AWS having a slight edge due to its pricing and support, making it favorable for critical workloads.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is notable for its block-level replication, simple deployment, and cost-effectiveness due to AWS's pricing strategy. Additionally, it integrates seamlessly with AWS services for reliable disaster recovery. IBM Storage Protect excels in incremental forever backups, data deduplication, and extensive scalability across various platforms, making it suitable for large enterprise environments.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could benefit from enhanced automation, more detailed logging, improved customer support response times, and better cost visibility during failover. IBM Storage Protect needs an improved user interface, simplified management, expanded support for virtual environments, and less complex licensing and cloud integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers a cloud-centric approach that aligns well with hybrid environments, boasting proactive customer service and technical support. IBM Storage Protect traditionally supports on-premises deployments but faces challenges with its complex architecture and deployment for new users.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's pay-as-you-go model provides cost savings and a great return on investment, aligned with its robust features. It can be expensive but is economical in terms of operational efficiency. IBM Storage Protect, though costly due to complex licensing, provides significant ROI for large-scale environments and existing IBM customers by offering comprehensive data protection.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
Support from IBM is very good, and they always have knowledgeable people.
Support is good from IBM, although it mainly comes from my local partner.
Some support staff are highly skilled, others are not, leading to longer times to resolve issues.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
TSM is a generic and robust product, which is why I continue using it for my core banking.
It is one of the most scalable platforms, and that is its strong point.
Scalability is great in IBM Spectrum Protect; there are several options available to scale.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
It is not compatible with other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
IBM Storage Protect does not work well with virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V.
There is a need for additional layers of security to fill the gaps, which is why we are using Cobalt Iron.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
We do not see the cost of the licensing.
It's expensive.
IBM Storage Protect is generally an expensive tool.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
The product works efficiently with very large tape libraries, unlike most other products in the market that have problems handling large tape libraries or more than one tape library.
IBM Spectrum Protect has excellent integration capability.
Incremental and differential backup features are built-in, which I frequently utilize on a weekly and daily basis.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM Storage Protect | 1.7% |
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| Other | 97.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 53 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 95 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
IBM Storage Protect offers data protection and management to secure critical business information efficiently. It's designed to be a scalable and flexible solution for data backup, recovery, and archive needs in complex IT environments.
IBM Storage Protect delivers comprehensive data protection by integrating backup, recovery, and archiving functionalities. It supports a range of workloads and infrastructures, from on-premises to cloud environments, facilitating efficient data management. Its platform provides seamless scalability to meet evolving business needs, underpinned by reliable security measures. Organizations leverage its capabilities to ensure business continuity and minimize data loss risks, making it vital in a data-driven world.
What are the key features of IBM Storage Protect?Industries like finance and healthcare implement IBM Storage Protect to safeguard sensitive information against threats. In financial services, it's crucial for maintaining client data confidentiality, while healthcare institutions use it to protect patient records, ensuring both accessibility and compliance with regulations.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.