AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud compete in the robust disaster recovery solutions market. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery appears to have the upper hand with seamless AWS ecosystem integration and cost-effective data protection, while Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud shines with its advanced security features, including ransomware protection.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides instant block replication, continuous data protection, and seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem for cost-effective disaster recovery. Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud offers comprehensive security features, ransomware protection, and versatile backup options, making it a preferred choice for businesses seeking data security.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could improve its logging with more detailed logs, enhance automation for simpler recovery processes, and improve its user interface to reduce operational complexity. Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud needs to enhance online cloud backup performance, improve its documentation, and simplify the management of security permissions and pricing to become more user-friendly.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports diverse environments including on-premises and hybrid cloud setups, receiving praise for its effective and responsive technical support. Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud focuses on cloud environments, offering a wide range of deployment models and commendable customer service, though it lacks a formal ticketing system for better support tracking.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's pay-as-you-go pricing model offers high ROI by minimizing downtime and data loss but is sometimes seen as expensive due to storage costs. Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud offers flexible pricing with various licensing options, providing cost-effective security features, although some consider these options pricey. Users value its comprehensive security and backup capabilities, which justify the investment.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
Their expertise and consulting are very good, especially for Indian business.
CloudGuard is on a WAF, which is a cloud-based Check Point WAF.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
I would like to see more mature XDR and EDR features.
Support could be improved.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
In India, the pricing of Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud is relatively low compared to other competitors.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
AI functionality enhances malware and threat detection by summarizing vulnerabilities, providing engineers with a direct idea about what needs to be covered.
The centralized management dashboard helps with team efficiency as well as handling security tasks.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud | 1.4% |
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 41 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
