AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs MSP360 Backup comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MSP360 are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.6, while MSP360 is ranked #60. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.7% mindshare in BRS, compared to MSP360’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of MSP360 users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 19 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

2,075 Views
934 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MSP360 Backup

Read 15 MSP360 Backup reviews

1,613 Views
1,048 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

MSP360 Backup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and MSP360 Backup compete in the disaster recovery solutions category. MSP360 Backup holds an edge in pricing and long-term ROI due to its robust features.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers seamless integration with AWS services, automated failover for minimal downtime, and secure data handling. MSP360 Backup provides cross-platform capability, integration with diverse cloud services, and versatile backup options.

Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery requires better documentation, an easier initial setup process, and more user-friendly interface. MSP360 Backup needs enhancements in data deduplication, quicker support response times, and improved incremental backup speeds.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is noted for its easy deployment within AWS infrastructure but has documentation issues. MSP360 Backup allows smooth multi-cloud deployment but has slower support response times.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is high-cost with slower ROI for smaller enterprises, whereas MSP360 Backup provides competitive pricing and faster ROI for SMBs.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

25th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

17th

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MSP360 Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

60th

Ranking in Cloud Backup

45th

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

MSP Backup (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MSP360 Backup is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery	0.7%
MSP360 Backup	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Harsh Shrivastava

Senior Software Engineer at Thomson Reuters

Rapid recovery has minimized downtime and protects critical data during frequent outages

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery can be improved through regular drills to ensure that all resources are properly prepared for disasters with scheduled drills. This includes testing and understanding failback, which is crucial for a comprehensive disaster recovery plan. Monitoring and health checks are important to continuously monitor the health of the ongoing replication using the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery console or programmatically. This helps identify any servers that may require attention and ensures that the application is functioning correctly. Creating a CloudFormation template that can create the necessary network resources on demand is useful for disaster recovery. There should be documentation and best practices guidance so that teams can follow best practices for implementation and maintenance of disaster recovery from on-premises using AWS. This includes a written recovery plan as well as regularly updating it with findings and required changes. Within the scope of improvements, there are many possibilities, but it is currently providing some great results. The scope of improvements can include monitoring and health checks as well as documentation with best practices for documentations, and conducting regular drills.

Read full review

CONRAD FORREST

President at MTS Consulting Group, Inc.

The solution provides the ability to backup all types of cloud drives, is inexpensive, and has decent support

MSP360 Backup provides the backup functionality, but we need to provide the storage component. We can use Azure, AWS, or another provider, but we need to choose the storage provider and create a bucket to store our data. The vendor is making changes to improve the functionality of the service and the separation of storage, but I would like to see more integration and a knowledge base of the tool. Currently trying to understand why the storage is separated and how to implement the storage properly is a challenge. Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service. Unlike other solutions such as Kohl which includes everything at one price. MSP360 Backup can be improved by adding inclusive pricing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

"Since deploying AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, we have mostly seen an improvement in uptime, which contributes to reducing downtime."

"I appreciate the automated orchestration of recovery processes in this solution, especially integration with Route 53 and automatically using Route 53 to switch to a different region directly."

"We have never had any issues with scalability."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a robust and reliable solution for disaster recovery needs."

"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex."

"MSP360 Backup's most valuable feature is its backup interface."

"The most valuable feature of MSP360 Backup is its reliability."

"The UI is pretty good. It's very simple. That is one thing that we like about this. It's very user-friendly."

"Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end."

"The solution is easy to access and handles things efficiently."

"It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution."

"Technical support is very good."

More MSP360 Backup pros

Cons

"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."

"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. "

"The failback could be improved. It should be more intuitive."

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."

"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."

"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."

"Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."

"The restore time could improve. When we had an issue the restore time was lengthy."

"The interface feels like it is targeted for end users who typically are looking for an all-in-one integrated push button solution. It would be better if the interface had a beginner mode and an expert mode."

"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."

"The Linux GUI leaves a lot to be desired. It lacks many of the features of the Windows version and is buggy, but it is still usable."

"As for what can be improved, some reports could be simplified so that you know how much backup you have done and what your backup details are. That report is available but it is very tough to get. I would like to know "today I have just uploaded 35 MB, tomorrow I have loaded 10 MB so my trend of backup is increasing.""

"The solution's pricing is very high."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

More MSP360 Backup cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

"The solution is expensive."

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

More MSP360 Backup pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The setup is actually managed by our partner. I have taken a rate of per user. Licensing is completely managed by the partner. I am paying per user and per GB storage cost, while the infrastructure...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

I think insights are an area for improvement. It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery. That...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 17% of the time

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 16% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Acronis Cyber Protect vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 13% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 13% of the time

NinjaOne vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 7% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 6% of the time

BDRShield vs MSP360 Backup

Compared 6% of the time

More MSP360 Backup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

December 2025

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

MSP360 Backup

December 2025

Download MSP360 Backup product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Cloudberry Backup

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MSP360 Backup is a comprehensive data protection solution designed for businesses of all sizes. It offers a wide range of features and capabilities to ensure the safety and security of critical data.

With support for various storage destinations, including local drives, network shares, and cloud storage providers, MSP360 Backup provides flexibility and scalability. It also offers advanced scheduling options, allowing users to automate backups based on specific time intervals or events.

The solution supports both full and incremental backups, minimizing storage requirements and optimizing backup speed. MSP360 Backup also includes built-in encryption and compression, ensuring data privacy and reducing storage costs. Additionally, it offers easy file and folder recovery, allowing users to quickly restore lost or corrupted data.

With its intuitive user interface and robust set of features, MSP360 Backup is a reliable and efficient solution for businesses looking to protect their valuable data.

MSP360

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

StratX

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. MSP360 Backup report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors, best Cloud Backup vendors, and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.