

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and IBM Spectrum Protect Plus both offer robust data protection solutions. User feedback indicates AWS has more positive ratings on deployment ease and customization, while IBM excels in feature set and integration.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its scalability, automated orchestration, and non-disruptive testing. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus stands out for its wide range of integrations, comprehensive backup options, and efficient data recovery. Simplified management and user-centric design put IBM ahead in feature richness.
Room for Improvement: AWS users suggest better cost transparency and more detailed documentation. IBM users want improvements in user experience and reduced complexity in initial setups. Users feel IBM can benefit from streamlining feature configurations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS is noted for its straightforward deployment process and strong customer support. IBM, while having a steeper learning curve, eventually offers a more feature-rich environment. Users report IBM's support is responsive but can be challenging due to product complexity.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is viewed as cost-effective with rapid ROI, though some users cite hidden costs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus demands higher investment, but users find the comprehensive features and long-term ROI justify the expense. IBM users perceive greater value in the extensive capabilities provided.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
Their documentation, runbooks, troubleshooting articles, and support people are good.
We do not have a good experience with this product.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
The solution does not provide horizontal and vertical scaling.
IBM Data Protect is the scalable solution, not IBM Spectrum Protect Plus.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
I cannot determine what benefit IBM Spectrum Protect Plus brings to the organization because we deployed this solution with one customer, and that customer changed the product after one or two years because the product is not stable and it changes with every version.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
It does not offer horizontal and vertical scaling.
I used IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, but IBM is now replacing it with IBM Data Protect, which is a giant product now in common development with a well-known company in backup solutions.
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus could be made more lightweight and user-friendly in terms of GUI features to make it closer to a perfect score.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
They are fairly expensive.
Pricing is good; it is reasonable and more reasonable than any other vendors.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
The biggest benefit of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is that it's an agentless backup product which is very easy to configure and use.
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is the software we work with, and the new name is IBM Storage Protect.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| IBM Spectrum Protect Plus | 1.1% |
| Other | 98.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is a data protection and availability solution for virtual environments that can be deployed in minutes and protect your environment within an hour. It simplifies data protection, whether data is hosted in physical, virtual, software-defined or cloud environments. It can be implemented as a stand-alone solution or integrate with your IBM Spectrum Protect environment to off-load copies for long term storage and data governance with scale and efficiency.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.