AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and IBM Spectrum Protect Plus both offer robust data protection solutions. User feedback indicates AWS has more positive ratings on deployment ease and customization, while IBM excels in feature set and integration.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for its scalability, automated orchestration, and non-disruptive testing. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus stands out for its wide range of integrations, comprehensive backup options, and efficient data recovery. Simplified management and user-centric design put IBM ahead in feature richness.
Room for Improvement: AWS users suggest better cost transparency and more detailed documentation. IBM users want improvements in user experience and reduced complexity in initial setups. Users feel IBM can benefit from streamlining feature configurations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS is noted for its straightforward deployment process and strong customer support. IBM, while having a steeper learning curve, eventually offers a more feature-rich environment. Users report IBM's support is responsive but can be challenging due to product complexity.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is viewed as cost-effective with rapid ROI, though some users cite hidden costs. IBM Spectrum Protect Plus demands higher investment, but users find the comprehensive features and long-term ROI justify the expense. IBM users perceive greater value in the extensive capabilities provided.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Their documentation, runbooks, troubleshooting articles, and support people are good.
IBM Data Protect is the scalable solution, not IBM Spectrum Protect Plus.
The solution does not provide horizontal and vertical scaling.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status.
I used IBM Spectrum Protect Plus, but IBM is now replacing it with IBM Data Protect, which is a giant product now in common development with a well-known company in backup solutions.
It does not offer horizontal and vertical scaling.
They are fairly expensive.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service is a native service, integration is seamless.
The biggest benefit of IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is that it's an agentless backup product which is very easy to configure and use.
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus is a data protection and availability solution for virtual environments that can be deployed in minutes and protect your environment within an hour. It simplifies data protection, whether data is hosted in physical, virtual, software-defined or cloud environments. It can be implemented as a stand-alone solution or integrate with your IBM Spectrum Protect environment to off-load copies for long term storage and data governance with scale and efficiency.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
