

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetVault Plus are prominent contenders in the disaster recovery and backup solutions market. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery seems to have an edge due to its seamless integration with cloud environments and efficient recovery features.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers seamless integration as a native service, providing continuous block-level replication to ensure up-to-date data synchronization with minimal data loss. Automated orchestration is key, reducing recovery time and operational overhead. Its cloud-based nature also provides extensive insights and alerting features. NetVault Plus, on the other hand, boasts robust backup and restoration capabilities with extensive database support, excelling in managing backups across multiple systems relative to physical infrastructure.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance flexible backup integration, improve cost visibility, and offer more detailed testing and reporting options. Meanwhile, NetVault Plus needs improvements in licensing flexibility and reporting and scheduling features, which can be limiting for large-scale infrastructure requirements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is optimized for cloud and hybrid cloud deployment, catering to modern infrastructures with high-rated customer service that ensures rapid support. NetVault Plus favors on-premises deployment, necessitating physical infrastructure. While customer support is generally helpful, the lack of a formal ticketing system could hinder user experiences.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery employs a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which is cost-efficient and scalable for expanding businesses, gaining substantial ROI through reduced downtime and operational savings. NetVault Plus, considered more expensive, uses component-based licensing for tailored cost management, yet still remains pricier compared to its competitors.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
The response time is good, but resolving some issues can take time due to dependencies on external devices.
I would rate Quest support as eight.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
Quest NetVault Plus is highly scalable, rated at an eight.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
There have been very few issues reported in the past year, with only one ticket raised, indicating its reliability.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware.
Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting.
NetVault Plus doesn't have a support team in my country; having a local contact in Turkey would be very useful for us.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
The pricing is not expensive, rated around a four in terms of cost.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
Quest NetVault Plus supports a wide range of databases such as MSSQL, MySQL, Oracle, and SAP, offering extensive coverage.
The application supports scanning files for malware before backup operations.
The backup and recovery capabilities of NetVault Plus are very important for maintaining my business.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 2.3% |
| NetVault Plus | 1.9% |
| Other | 95.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
NetVault Plus is a dependable backup and recovery solution that efficiently manages and protects data across multiple environments, supporting scalable operations through user-friendly features and extensive compatibility with databases and virtual systems.
NetVault Plus offers a comprehensive approach to data backup and recovery, suitable for large-scale implementations across various industries. With capabilities in snapshot-based backup, swift recovery, and malware scanning, it ensures stable operations. The platform supports numerous databases and virtual machines, providing network access control and timely email updates on job statuses. Users benefit from its straightforward recovery processes and the ability to create backup jobs and tape server restoration. Though improvements are needed in web interface speed, pricing transparency, restore accuracy, and compatibility with newer technologies like MongoDB and Microsoft updates, it remains a significant tool for robust data protection.
What are the core features of NetVault Plus?In specialized industries like pharmacy and retail, NetVault Plus enhances client data management and security log processes, leveraging application snapshotting to protect virtual environments such as Nutanix Xi. It provides robust protection and backup solutions tailored to diverse server versions, including Oracle, SQL, and bare metal recovery scenarios.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.