

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetVault Plus are prominent contenders in the disaster recovery and backup solutions market. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery seems to have an edge due to its seamless integration with cloud environments and efficient recovery features.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers seamless integration as a native service, providing continuous block-level replication to ensure up-to-date data synchronization with minimal data loss. Automated orchestration is key, reducing recovery time and operational overhead. Its cloud-based nature also provides extensive insights and alerting features. NetVault Plus, on the other hand, boasts robust backup and restoration capabilities with extensive database support, excelling in managing backups across multiple systems relative to physical infrastructure.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance flexible backup integration, improve cost visibility, and offer more detailed testing and reporting options. Meanwhile, NetVault Plus needs improvements in licensing flexibility and reporting and scheduling features, which can be limiting for large-scale infrastructure requirements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is optimized for cloud and hybrid cloud deployment, catering to modern infrastructures with high-rated customer service that ensures rapid support. NetVault Plus favors on-premises deployment, necessitating physical infrastructure. While customer support is generally helpful, the lack of a formal ticketing system could hinder user experiences.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery employs a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which is cost-efficient and scalable for expanding businesses, gaining substantial ROI through reduced downtime and operational savings. NetVault Plus, considered more expensive, uses component-based licensing for tailored cost management, yet still remains pricier compared to its competitors.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
The customer support is amazing, and it is the best customer support I have ever had.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
The response time is good, but resolving some issues can take time due to dependencies on external devices.
I would rate Quest support as eight.
Technical support is great for NetVault Plus.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 10 out of 10.
Quest NetVault Plus is highly scalable, rated at an eight.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
There have been very few issues reported in the past year, with only one ticket raised, indicating its reliability.
Stability-wise, Quest NetVault is a stable product for me, with the exception of Office 365.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware.
Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting.
I have never been able to have a solid backup of Office 365 using Quest NetVault.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
pricing is fair, and you pay for the use.
The pricing is not expensive, rated around a four in terms of cost.
It could be cheaper.
I cannot say the rate is cheap.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
Quest NetVault Plus supports a wide range of databases such as MSSQL, MySQL, Oracle, and SAP, offering extensive coverage.
The application supports scanning files for malware before backup operations.
The backup and recovery capabilities of NetVault Plus are very important for maintaining my business.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 2.5% |
| NetVault Plus | 1.9% |
| Other | 95.6% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
NetVault Plus provides efficient backup management via web access, supports diverse databases, and simplifies recovery tasks. Its GUI, snapshot backups, malware scanning, and advanced reporting meet diverse IT needs efficiently.
NetVault Plus enhances backup management with its web-based interface, providing seamless access without server login. It supports various databases like MySQL, MS SQL, and Oracle, facilitating streamlined recovery procedures. Utilized in environments such as VMware and Hyper-V, it offers comprehensive data protection, including deduplication and encryption. While it excels in features like snapshot-based backups and malware scanning, users note areas for improvement, such as SQL backup plugins and scheduling options. Compatibility issues, limited storage, and a need for enhanced cloud integration are also noted. Employed extensively across industries such as pharma and retail, it addresses a wide array of IT requirements with large-scale deployments.
What are the key features of NetVault Plus?In industries like pharma and retail, NetVault Plus supports essential backup and recovery tasks. Users prioritize VMware integration and optimal data protection, utilizing tape libraries for reliable data transfer. Its application in diverse sectors ensures comprehensive coverage and security compliance.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.