

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager compete in disaster recovery and data management. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features and compliance capabilities.
Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers comprehensive cloud integration, automatic scaling, and flexible recovery options. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager provides advanced data protection, extensive backup and restore options, and compliance features suitable for complex environments.
Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users suggest improved integration with on-premises systems, better logging mechanisms, and enhanced hybrid capabilities. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager users desire enhanced automation, a more intuitive setup process, and streamlined user interactions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is noted for straightforward deployment in cloud-native environments but has mixed feedback on support responsiveness. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager has a steeper learning curve but benefits from robust support and detailed documentation, making it preferred for extensive deployments.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is appreciated for its pay-as-you-go pricing model, considered cost-effective for scalable environments. Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is seen as a higher upfront investment but offers significant ROI through its comprehensive features, delivering better long-term value for larger enterprises.
However, with AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Service being a native service, integration is seamless, highlighting the return on investment.
The recovery process requires fewer people and much less time, which has saved my organization engineering effort and operational time.
We no longer have to schedule employees on weekends since the system automatically triggers alerts, allowing engineers to respond as needed.
Previously they had somewhere around 100 TB of capacity for the backup for a few VMs on one side. Now, the overall setup is hardly 80 TB, where they use almost 240 TB of production data into that 80 TB.
I would recommend Dell PowerProtect Data Manager to other organizations because it is cost-effective and delivers good performance compared to alternative solutions.
I do find that with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, the ROI is good when compared to other Dell products, but when compared to others in the current market, such as Cohesity or Veeam, it is not as good.
In case of any issue, they are ready to provide support within the defined SLA timeline.
Helping us in troubleshooting each and every step if we face any issues.
Higher tiers offer faster response time and more direct technical help.
Dell provides reliable support for PowerProtect Data Manager, with 24/7 availability and a qualified support team.
My experience with the technical support team of Dell is that they are actually great.
When we had the compliances and any of the backups were getting failed or we identified that some of the backups were frequently failing, the system would alert us.
We can expand it to multiple data centers or different areas such as EMEA and APAC.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is scalable because it can protect and replicate multiple servers and workloads, and it runs on AWS infrastructure.
The scalability is quite good and we were able to scale this service to many of the services that our company uses.
Its capability to back up existing environments can be improved, particularly when it comes to disaster recovery in the cloud.
As per the documentation, that is an easy process, whether you need to scale up or scale out.
If you are okay to purchase the license, they have the feasibility to increase the capacity as well.
It is very good and very reliable.
AWS is not difficult, but the cost associated with replicating data to another region can be significant.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable.
It is extremely reliable and I have never experienced a crash.
Making sure the system is properly understood before deployment and handling upgrades efficiently would improve stability.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Dell PowerProtect Data Manager as quite stable; there are no issues with the workloads I am using.
Our RPO improved from approximately three to four hours to less than one minute.
This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing.
It would be beneficial to get some insights when a disaster happens, including identification and probable solutions to ensure effective recovery.
I would like to see improvements that include bare metal restore capabilities and enhanced data restore features in Dell PowerProtect Data Manager.
This is an enterprise solution and a bit costlier, but it is a solution where people should be looking into if they want to go into one single umbrella and have the centralized backup solution, which integrates with the cloud and can manage their cloud workload as well as the on-premises workload, and can be managed with one dashboard.
Enhancements for microservices and container backups would be beneficial, enabling a more consolidated management platform for modern architectures.
In my case, since the cloud is basically a pay-as-you-go model, we only pay for the replication storage, data transfer, and small staging instances.
Continuous replication minimizes data loss and the cost-efficient staging environment helps reduce infrastructure expenses compared to maintaining a full secondary disaster recovery site.
There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager is cost-effective, as it is licensed per socket rather than by workload.
Overall, pricing does not significantly impact our decision.
compared to some other products, it is a bit more costly.
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports a wide range of source environments, including VMware, Hyper-V, physical servers, and other cloud providers, making it versatile for different IT infrastructures.
The low RPO at a seconds-level replication and a fast recovery with a low RTO provide the most cost-effective way, paying mostly for storage until failover.
Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios.
It provides a seamless backup solution integrated with a dashboard full of capabilities, enhancing recovery point objectives and recovery time objectives.
It satisfies my customers' scalability needs and provides interactive features, allowing efficient integration.
Compared to other products such as Veritas, Dell offers more competitive pricing while other vendors charge significantly more.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Dell PowerProtect Data Manager | 2.4% |
| AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery | 0.8% |
| Other | 96.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager provides efficient backup and recovery for hybrid and multicloud environments. It consolidates VMware, Kubernetes, database, and file system protection through a singular interface.
PowerProtect Data Manager is a software-defined platform that integrates modern backup and recovery capabilities, focusing on enhancing performance metrics like RPO and RTO. It supports operations through automated discovery, policy-driven protection, and intelligent analytics while offering cloud mobility and robust cyber recovery mechanisms. Its architecture is designed to address complex data management needs while providing flexibility, backup efficiency, and capacity management. With capabilities spanning on-premise and cloud options, it delivers a comprehensive approach for data protection.
What key features make Dell PowerProtect Data Manager stand out?Organizations in telecom and enterprise sectors employ Dell PowerProtect Data Manager for backing up and securing data in virtual and cloud-native environments. It supports continuous data protection for VMware and Kubernetes and plays a crucial role in ensuring container stability in platforms like OpenShift. Its native application integrations and disaster recovery through incremental backups make it suitable for larger businesses seeking a reliable data management partner.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.