AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Druva inSync comparison

"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."

"The most valuable aspect of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is its instant block replication feature. This allows us to perform live block verification and eliminates the need to concern ourselves with recovery point objectives. This capability is particularly advantageous for critical workloads."

"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."

"It offers seamless integration with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate for deploying containerized applications."

"We have never had any issues with scalability."

"The solution is dependent on the network bandwidth. For example, if they have a bandwidth of 10Mbps the solution will run a little heavier. If the bandwidth is good the solution runs well."

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

"The strong points are the stability and scalability of the solution, as well as the convenience of it being cloud-based."

"It has a straightforward installation."

"The recovery aspect of the solution is its most valuable feature."

"The tool has good features. The backup is also accurate."

"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."

"We get control over authentication policies and create an agentless backup by generating a token for that."

"Druva inSync is very easy to use."

"If you are looking for a backup solution, go with Druva because it's quite simple."

"The way they handle the backups is pretty good."

"The solution's network setup and a lot of the control tower setup could be improved."

"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."

"Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."

"An improved AWS pricing model is needed."

"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. ​"

"The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure."

"The one area that needs to improve is the pricing."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"If I could have an accelerator or something to back up the solution on the cloud, that would be helpful. Also, it would be helpful if the accelerator could give me a buffer of a couple of days for any kind of immediate recovery on an offsite."

"The speed could be better."

"The product needs to improve its support."

"It would be good if bare metal backups were possible."

"The support of other cloud services needs to be improved. It has very good cloud support for AWS but not with others."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.​"

"The pricing is thirty-five dollars per year or three dollars per month per user."

"The product is fairly priced, I would rate its pricing five out of ten."

"The price is quite good, It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"The pricing is good."

"It is an expensive product for the middle class or SMB customers in India. A lot of top-level big companies also cannot afford this solution. During the license period, one can download the entire data from the cloud without paying any additional cost. This way the data can be easily recreated from the stored data when a machine is lost or the data is compromised."

"Once you decide to go with this product the cost can be worked out with the vendor."

"Out of all the solutions we evaluated, Druva inSync was the most affordable."

"It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."