Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ITRS Geneos Logo

Top 10 ITRS Geneos Alternatives

Vendor: ITRS
4.1 out of 5
1,848 followers
Start review

Top ITRS Geneos Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ITRS Geneos based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

ITRS Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ITRS, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers comprehensive AI-driven capabilities, auto-discovery, and full-stack monitoring. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring for the financial sector. Users favor Dynatrace for advanced analytics, while ITRS Geneos is preferred for specialized financial features and cost-effectiveness in large-scale deployments.
Download Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos Report
Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which is known for more affordable installation fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which is known for more affordable installation fees.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities with easy integration across cloud platforms. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers tailored on-premise monitoring. Both solutions have distinct strengths, making them appealing for different technical needs in various environments. Datadog's cloud versatility contrasts with ITRS Geneos' detailed on-premise control.
Download Datadog vs. ITRS Geneos Report
Datadog setup costs are minimal compared to ITRS Geneos where higher initial investments are required. This difference makes Datadog more appealing for those seeking immediate cost efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog setup costs are minimal compared to ITRS Geneos where higher initial investments are required. This difference makes Datadog more appealing for those seeking immediate cost efficiency.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers cost-effective open-source flexibility and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides robust features, extensive integration options, and advanced analytics. Zabbix is praised for straightforward deployment, while ITRS Geneos excels in thorough customer service and tailored enterprise functionalities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix incurs no initial setup costs, while ITRS Geneos has a higher setup expense. Zabbix is more cost-effective during installation, contrasting with ITRS Geneos, which may burden budgets upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix incurs no initial setup costs, while ITRS Geneos has a higher setup expense. Zabbix is more cost-effective during installation, contrasting with ITRS Geneos, which may burden budgets upfront.
ITRS Geneos Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos is known for real-time monitoring and customizable dashboards, making it suitable for detailed, on-premise monitoring needs. In comparison, New Relic's advanced analytics and broad integrations cater to users needing extensive cloud-based monitoring solutions. ITRS Geneos excels in customer service, while New Relic offers efficient deployment.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. New Relic Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas New Relic's setup cost is lower, appealing to smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, making it suitable for larger enterprises, whereas New Relic's setup cost is lower, appealing to smaller businesses.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers competitive pricing and robust customer support in IT monitoring, praised for real-time performance and customization. In comparison, Azure Monitor’s superior features, including scalability and Azure service integration, justify its higher cost, making it an appealing choice for comprehensive cloud ecosystems.
Download Azure Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly setup options.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers versatile monitoring with stack trace and JVM features, ideal for diverse application layers. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring, specifically tailored for financial services, providing customizable dashboards and robust system integration.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while ITRS Geneos offers a more complex setup, leading to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while ITRS Geneos offers a more complex setup, leading to higher initial expenses.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
ITRS Geneos excels in enterprise-level monitoring, ideal for financial market data and trading systems. In comparison, Grafana stands out with its open-source, customizable visualizations. ITRS Geneos provides robust customer service, while Grafana offers easier deployment and lower costs. Both deliver strong ROI and unique advantages.
Download Grafana vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while Grafana offers a considerably lower expense for initial setup. The significant difference in upfront costs reflects their differing approaches to budget and infrastructure management.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a high setup cost, while Grafana offers a considerably lower expense for initial setup. The significant difference in upfront costs reflects their differing approaches to budget and infrastructure management.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers comprehensive monitoring and reliable performance, ideal for detailed analytics and rapid insights. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in customization and integration, making it suitable for environments requiring large dataset handling and flexible visualization. Each solution meets diverse technical monitoring needs.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ITRS Geneos Report
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, highlighting a significant difference between the two solutions. Elastic Observability's lower setup cost may be attractive for budget-conscious organizations.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring tailored to finance with customizable alerts and seamless integration, making it adaptable for financial services. In comparison, Prometheus Group is valued for open-source scalability and cost-effectiveness, featuring PromQL for metric collection across cloud environments.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Prometheus Group Report
ITRS Geneos offers competitive setup costs, whereas Prometheus Group may have higher initial expenses. Users should consider ITRS Geneos for cost-effective implementation and Prometheus Group for robust features that justify their setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos offers competitive setup costs, whereas Prometheus Group may have higher initial expenses. Users should consider ITRS Geneos for cost-effective implementation and Prometheus Group for robust features that justify their setup investment.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5

ITRS Geneos excels in providing reliable analytics for financial services. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers broader features and ease of use. ITRS Geneos handles large data volumes effectively, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provides user-friendly dashboards and integration with other tools.

Download ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report
ITRS Geneos has a lower initial setup cost, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor requires a higher investment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos has a lower initial setup cost, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor requires a higher investment upfront.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management provides comprehensive monitoring and predictive analytics, focusing on scalability and complexity reduction. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring and customization but can improve in ease of setup and documentation. Both deliver valuable ROI, justifying their costs.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. ITRS Geneos Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which tends to be more expensive upfront. This price difference is significant for organizations considering initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which tends to be more expensive upfront. This price difference is significant for organizations considering initial investment.
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers extensive real-time monitoring ideal for financial institutions, favoring customization but challenging deployment. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in diverse infrastructures with comprehensive dashboards, though it presents higher costs and complex configurations. Each has strengths depending on user priorities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
ITRS Geneos involves substantial costs for initial setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos involves substantial costs for initial setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers more budget-friendly setup options.
ITRS Geneos Logo
Scout APM
5.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
Scout APM
5.0 out of 5

Scout APM is an application performance monitoring solution that simplifies the troubleshooting process by enabling developers to discover and repair performance problems before clients ever notice them. Scout APM uses a developer-based UI with real-time alerting and intuitive tracing logic to identify bottlenecks precisely to the source code. This helps to greatly reduce time and effort needed to debug code and results in greater productivity and improved outcomes.

View comparison
ITRS Geneos Logo
ITRS Geneos Logo
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
3.3 out of 5
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager offers reliable monitoring capabilities and sophisticated alerting, making it a cost-effective choice with strong customer support. In comparison, ITRS Geneos provides advanced configurability and in-depth analytics, justifying its higher price with a faster deployment process and superior value.
Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. ITRS Geneos Report
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher setup costs compared to ITRS Geneos.
ITRS Geneos Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
ITRS Geneos Logo
AlertSite
4.0 out of 5
AlertSite is praised for its intuitive setup and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. In comparison, ITRS Geneos offers detailed analytics and customizability. AlertSite could improve reporting, while ITRS Geneos needs easier navigation. Affordable AlertSite offers quick ROI, whereas ITRS Geneos's advanced features justify its higher cost.
Download AlertSite vs. ITRS Geneos Report
AlertSite has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which may influence total onboarding expenses. While AlertSite offers a more economical start, ITRS Geneos might provide more advanced initial configurations at a higher initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
AlertSite has a lower setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which may influence total onboarding expenses. While AlertSite offers a more economical start, ITRS Geneos might provide more advanced initial configurations at a higher initial cost.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring