ITRS Geneos vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ITRS Logo
4,407 views|2,309 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
SolarWinds Logo
5,175 views|3,398 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jun 29, 2023

We performed a comparison between SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and ITRS Geneos based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: ITRS Geneos' setup process is described as complex and time-consuming, in contrast to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor which is considered relatively easy and straightforward. Geneos necessitates more time for the deployment and building the monitoring catalog, whereas SolarWinds is a cloud solution that does not require installation. Upgrades for SolarWinds can be time-consuming, while Geneos may require occasional manual restarts for maintenance.
  • Features: SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provides thorough monitoring of various aspects, such as processes and services, infrastructure dependency mapping, and component and cable monitoring. On the other hand, ITRS Geneos is known for its flexibility, customization, and real-time data monitoring, which are valuable features.
  • Pricing: SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor's cost is determined by the number of devices and modules, while ITRS Geneos has a pricing strategy that includes additional costs for add-ons. SolarWinds is viewed as pricey by certain reviewers, whereas ITRS Geneos is seen as reasonably priced for the banking industry but possibly too expensive for non-banking and non-finance sectors.
  • Service and Support: While SolarWinds has a mix of positive and negative feedback, with some customers praising their service and others criticizing long waiting times and a lack of initial knowledge, ITRS Geneos generally receives positive feedback. Customers appreciate their excellent technical support and effective ticketing system, although some have complained about slow response times and communication gaps.
  • ROI: SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is effective in improving server and application performance, reducing downtime, and increasing productivity. Meanwhile, ITRS Geneos has the ability to detect potential client issues, manage alerts proactively, and eliminate the need for in-house development.

Comparison Results: SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, easy infrastructure dependency mapping, and is easy to use. While ITRS Geneos is highly customizable and provides real-time data monitoring, it lacks features such as code-level monitoring, cloud-based monitoring, and a mobile app. The initial setup for ITRS Geneos can be complex and require direct onsite support for several weeks, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor has an easy initial setup. Overall, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is a valuable tool for improving server and application performance and provides a positive ROI for users, making it the preferred solution.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment.""One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts.""ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers.""The built-in plug-ins allow administrators to easily configure monitoring components for market data systems such as Thomson Reuters Enterprise Platform and SRLabs Wombat (formerly NYSE).""Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue.""The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring.""Geneos automatically sends email notifications when any batch job fails, the database is down or the website is down. It is automatically monitoring everything and reduces manual effort.""This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."

More ITRS Geneos Pros →

"Extremely user friendly: Any IT professional can learn how to admin NPM in a short time.""This product can monitor application environments no matter where they reside and provides capabilities for deep insight into infrastructure.""Solarwinds has an open database that allows you to do serious integrations. It doesn't matter which service desk you have, you can implement and integrate it with SolarWinds.""Features like monitoring and infrastructure dependency mapping are valuable to us.""AppInsight for SQL: Enables us to see the relevant error log entries on the same page as performance parameters.""The application dependency feature identifies issues between applications and servers or within the network where the application is hosted. It highlights related problems, whether related to packet processing or other issues, enabling the creation of alerts and reports accordingly.""The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is its powerful monitoring capabilities.""The more valuable feature of this solution is the Exchange feature."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Pros →

Cons
"I would also like to see suggested guidelines to accomplish a monitoring task. The issue is that ITRS is so flexible that there is more than one way to complete a task, each with benefits and disadvantages.""The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard.""One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production.""ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement.""The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer.""t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers.""Data visualization – real time and historical – is a weakness.""The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

More ITRS Geneos Cons →

"Solarwinds should come up the same monitoring system for other certificate expiration alert apart from SSL.""An additional feature that would improve this solution is the ability to complete root cause analysis.""One area that could benefit from improvement is its performance""There is one feature that is a report writer. And they are currently trying to take it out from being a stand-alone application and integrating to the web. This doesn't give us the flexibility and it doesn't expand what we can get when it comes to reporting. So, putting it on the web is going to make it difficult to get some information. Leaving it where it is now will help us a lot.""Reporting is the only thing with which we currently have challenges. They have this in two ways. There is the report writer, which is the backend, and we also have web reports, which are on the console. So, they have removed the report writer for the backend reports, and we are making use of the web console, but most of the users are not finding it very interesting to use the frontend reports. I would like them to bring back the report writer. That's the key area within it to improve on the reporting. If they can bring back the report writer, then most users will actually be comfortable. I have some customers who are trying to export their report to an Excel format, but it is not possible because they said any report that has been done from the web console cannot be exported to Excel, but most of the customers need to export their reports to Excel. That's one area they need to work on.""PerfStack can be made more effective. I am sure SolarWinds already has a plan for the same in coming versions.""The product needs to reduce its price.""The tool's AppStack needs to improve in the storage monitoring part. It should also include an analytics and recommendation approach. If I have found a fault in a server or application, I would like to know what caused it and how do I recover from it."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."
  • "The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."
  • "Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."
  • "The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."
  • "Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."
  • "It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."
  • "When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."
  • "Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."
  • More ITRS Geneos Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I have always said SolarWinds is very “proud” of their products, meaning they are expensive. I cannot afford to purchase all the licenses I need for all the SolarWinds products."
  • "When planning for the number of licenses to purchase, make sure you understand all of the elements within an application required to really understand performance well. In our case, we quickly came to the conclusion that an unlimited license for SAM was the way to go."
  • "Nagios XI, WhatsUpGold, Uptime Software, PRTG, Manage Engine, and SpiceWorks are the other tools that have lower pricing and licensing costs. However, they can't compete with SolarWinds when it comes to the features and functionality that SolarWinds can provide."
  • "I would advise potential buyers to wait until the end of the quarter, end of year, or other time to place orders. There are actually great deals to be had at those times if your budget cycle can match up."
  • "Pricing and licensing is fair for what you get. It does have a great bang-for-the-buck appeal."
  • "SAM is not per server so the pricing model can be deceiving. If you have an enterprise environment, you will quickly exceed your licensing quickly. You should know this before going in."
  • "Understanding the counts of objects to monitor will determine the licensing need. In terms of pricing, it’s not cheap but it’s not expensive as larger vendors whose products don’t have all the features or integrations."
  • "The product might cost you $30,000 USD to buy, but scaling this solution requires the purchase of additional polling engines at $20,000 USD each."
  • More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.
    Top Answer:The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.
    Top Answer:ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data if… more »
    Top Answer:The price is too high. The tool is overpriced. We don't need all the features. The product must minimize the features and reduce the price. It all comes down to pricing. The customers find it pretty… more »
    Top Answer:The biggest pain point is root cause analysis. It is difficult to analyze, assess, and warn my IT department about what will happen in the next five hours. It is also difficult to use AIOps to reduce… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,407
    Comparisons
    2,309
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    1,486
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    5,175
    Comparisons
    3,398
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    427
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Geneos
    SolarWinds SAM
    Learn More
    Overview

    ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

    Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

    Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

    For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

    SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor (SAM) delivers powerful application and server monitoring capabilities for IT pros, enabling them to diagnose and troubleshoot performance issues faster. Do not let slow applications and downtime impact your end-users and business services. Pinpoint the root cause of application issues across various layers of the IT stack. SolarWinds SAM is affordable and easy to deploy, use, and customize. You can automatically discover your system's environment and start monitoring in about an hour. No professional services or consultation needed.

    Sample Customers
    ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.
    Andr. L. Riis AS, NetSuite
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm92%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Marketing Services Firm3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm76%
    Computer Software Company5%
    University3%
    Comms Service Provider3%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Construction Company13%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm7%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization40%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise88%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ITRS Geneos is ranked 11th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 57 reviews while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is ranked 21st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews. ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor writes "We use this product for base and application monitoring. ". ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana, Prometheus and Datadog, whereas SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is most compared with Azure Monitor, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Prometheus and ServiceNow Discovery. See our ITRS Geneos vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.