

CrowdStrike Falcon and Microsoft Defender XDR are competitors in the endpoint protection and detection domain. CrowdStrike Falcon has the upper hand in threat intelligence and remote investigation capabilities, while Microsoft Defender XDR stands out for its advanced threat remediation and integration with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Features: CrowdStrike Falcon offers comprehensive endpoint detection and response, real-time remote investigation, and AI-enhanced threat intelligence. Microsoft Defender XDR features advanced threat remediation, seamless integration within Microsoft 365, and effective behavior-based threat detection.
Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike Falcon needs better reporting capabilities, improved dashboard functionality, and more seamless device integration. Microsoft Defender XDR should enhance its interface design, simplify licensing models, and bolster threat-hunting capabilities and third-party integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both solutions can be deployed across various platforms, but CrowdStrike has greater acceptance in on-premises deployments. CrowdStrike offers proactive customer support through multiple channels, while Microsoft Defender’s support is responsive but sometimes lacks depth in non-premium packages.
Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon's high pricing can be challenging for smaller firms but offers value by reducing workforce needs. Microsoft Defender XDR benefits from economies of scale as part of Microsoft 365 bundles, making it cost-effective when used with other Microsoft products. Both promise significant ROI through operational efficiency and reduced security incidents, with CrowdStrike excelling in reducing manpower and Microsoft offering seamless ecosystem integration.
CrowdStrike Falcon saves time and offers good value for money, especially for enterprise companies, because it can stop breaches.
It's very easy to deploy without many IT admins, saving time.
We can quarantine and isolate a device within minutes.
Microsoft Defender XDR has saved me at least 50% of my time.
It helped stop multiple intrusion points where we would have had millions in lost revenue if the attackers got in.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the technical support as a 10 because they resolve many issues for us.
The CrowdStrike team is very efficient; I would rate them ten out of ten.
They could improve by initiating calls for high-priority cases instead of just opening tickets.
You get stuck in low-level support for way longer than you should, instead of them escalating the issue up the chain.
It's critical to escalate SEV B issues immediately to a domestic engineer.
Once issues are escalated to the second or third layer, the support is much better.
It has adequate coverage and is easy to deploy.
In terms of scalability, I find CrowdStrike to be stable, and I have not encountered any limitations with it.
There's no scalability limitation from CrowdStrike itself, as it just requires agent deployment.
My concern is about the scale of events and alerts being generated, and the product is doing a very good job of only surfacing the important items for us.
Microsoft Defender XDR shows tremendous scalability, much more so than on-premises solutions.
Microsoft Defender XDR scales pretty well.
I have never seen instability in the CrowdStrike tool.
We are following N-1 versions across our environment, which is stable.
The biggest issue occurred when every computer worldwide experienced a blue screen.
The service has remained consistently online, with any issues isolated to specific components, suggesting a well-designed and modular architecture.
The services within our ecosystem have been reliable, meeting their SLAs.
It provides high-fidelity signals.
Simplifying the querying process, such as using double quote queries or directly obtaining logs based on IP addresses or usernames, would be beneficial.
Another concern is CrowdStrike's GUI. It changes annually, making it hard to work and find options.
Threat prevention should be their first priority.
The licensing process needs improvement and clarification.
Improvements are needed in automated response capabilities.
Some inconsistencies exist between blades, which could be improved for a more seamless user and UI experience.
It is expensive compared to SentinelOne, but as the market leader, it is worth it.
The licensing cost and setup costs are affordable.
The solution is a bit expensive.
There are certainly savings when using Microsoft Defender XDR, which can range from 30%, 40%, and even up to 50%.
I would rate the pricing as eight out of ten, indicating it is a reasonable cost for the product.
Microsoft purposefully obfuscates this through marketing ploys to hide costs.
I can investigate by accessing the customer's host based on the RTR environment and utilize host search to know details for the past seven days, including logins, processes, file installations, malicious processes, and network connections.
The real-time analytics aspect of CrowdStrike performs well because we get all logs in real-time, with no delay, allowing us to take action immediately.
Being an EDR solution, it helps us identify attacks in real-time.
With Microsoft threat intelligence information, it detects various types of threats, including insider attacks, malicious content, and data exfiltration.
This allows us to secure our systems in advance and proactively improve security, rather than waiting for incidents to occur.
Once we have it on the security dashboard, we can see a real-time storyline.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 10.4% |
| Microsoft Defender XDR | 5.0% |
| Other | 84.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 62 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 47 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 38 |
CrowdStrike Falcon offers robust endpoint protection and threat detection, leveraging cloud-native architecture and AI-driven capabilities for advanced security. Its design ensures minimal system impact, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking efficient protection solutions.
CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive security features, including endpoint detection and response, real-time threat insights, and advanced AI-driven detection mechanisms. Its cloud-native architecture facilitates effortless scalability and seamless integration with cloud services, securing endpoints, servers, and roaming users. While Falcon delivers strong threat intelligence and automated detection, it faces challenges in operating system compatibility, reports require enhancements, and integration with some technologies is limited. High pricing and occasional false positives are noted areas for improvement, along with expanded support for older systems.
What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?In industries requiring fortified cybersecurity measures, CrowdStrike Falcon is deployed for endpoint protection and incident response. It offers advanced threat defense and integrates well with cloud services, making it a suitable replacement for traditional antivirus solutions. For sectors engaging in forensic investigations and real-time malware defense, Falcon's capabilities align with their security demands, serving industries from healthcare to finance.
Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.
It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.
Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.
Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.