Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Dynatrace and ITRS are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Dynatrace is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9, while ITRS is ranked #34 with an average rating of 5.0. Dynatrace holds a 8.1% mindshare in APM, compared to ITRS’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Dynatrace users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Dynatrace

Read 351 Dynatrace reviews

24,085 Views
16,860 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

4,004 Views
2,723 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Dynatrace

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Dynatrace and ITRS Geneos are leading products in the IT monitoring space. Dynatrace stands out with better pricing and support satisfaction, making it a strong competitor despite ITRS Geneos's feature richness and superior user reviews.

What features are offered by Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace offers AI-driven performance monitoring, comprehensive cloud-native capabilities, and streamlined deployment. ITRS Geneos features deep customizability, real-time monitoring precision, and specialized financial services support.

What areas of improvement can be found in Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace users mention a steep learning curve, desire more flexible customization options, and need better documentation. ITRS Geneos requires an easier initial configuration, a more modern interface, and enhanced integration capabilities.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. ITRS Geneos has complex deployment but is supported by robust customer service, albeit sometimes slower than desired.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Dynatrace in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

Dynatrace pricing is competitive, offering quicker ROI through streamlined operations. ITRS Geneos has higher setup costs but justifies the investment with its powerful, specialized monitoring features.

To learn more, read our detailed Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,085 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dynatrace

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

351

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (11th), Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (2nd), AIOps (3rd)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (68th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (45th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Dynatrace is 8.1%, down from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Dynatrace	8.1%
ITRS Geneos	1.1%
Other	90.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Anand_Kumar

Enterprise Architect at DXC Technology

Provides a comprehensive view by integrating with other monitoring systems

There may be an issue since there are many tools like Splunk involved in network monitoring. From an IP perspective, Dynatrace is performing well. If they want to develop in network monitoring, they can, as it's part of their product line. It's not rocketry, so they can accomplish it. If I, as an SI, look at it from an enterprise perspective, considering the cost from the client, I prefer not to go with multiple systems, as they don't provide a complete 360-degree view. They need to improve on claims about being an enterprise system. The definition of enterprise is loosely used, however, from a holistic security perspective, including infrastructure, network, ports, software, applications, transactions, and databases, there are areas lacking, especially in network monitoring tools.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have drastically reduced the delay taken by the diagnostic phase. As we identify the root cause very rapidly, we can now focus on the solution and communication."

"We can analyse problems more quickly, and detecting problems becomes easier with Dynatrace."

"The User Sessions Query language has definitely been the most helpful with its key user actions and user session properties. Using those together, that has completely transformed how we're able to identify customers and their problems on our site. It has made a very big impact over the year."

"I like the full-stack agents, the Oneagents, and the futures dynamic."

"Improves the ability to isolate issues and determine root cause with the same tool."

"It gives you a great level of detail into whatever the issue is: Using troubleshooting and getting to the root cause."

"For stability, our customers have no complaints."

"Dynatrace offers exceptional features compared to other monitoring tools."

More Dynatrace pros

"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"This solution has helped provide relief to existing Level 2 teams, allowing them to focus efforts on in-depth problem analysis."

"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."

"ITRS can define rules to alert when certain parameters that you monitor breach a threshold. Rules can be configured to fire recovery actions automatically to clear the alert"

"Custom script toolkits"

"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"I would like to see AppMon also integrated in the Dynatrace portal. There are certain features, which I am not saying are not there in Dynatrace, but I am used to in AppMon."

"An additional feature that we could use is the rollover. If we could rollover to different datacenters, then it would satisfy our requirement. I.e., if one datacenter fails, then we could rollover to another datacenter."

"They need to improve on claims about being an enterprise system. The definition of enterprise is loosely used, however, from a holistic security perspective, including infrastructure, network, ports, software, applications, transactions, and databases, there are areas lacking, especially in network monitoring tools."

"There is still a certain amount of technical skills needed to be able to understand what you are seeing on it. You also need a large amount of technical or infrastructure skills to understand how and where to install it."

"The other feature that Dynatrace should have is - from what I see in Dynatrace in our PoC - when you auto-upgrade the agents, the JVM or the application has to be restarted. But if you have something like an "auto-attach" feature, to attach the agent for the running process, it would not require a JVM restart. That would be nicer. That is a killer point."

"The configuration of the alerts, that's been a challenge in AppMon for me, right now. Some of the alerts are too noisy, but that might be my lack of some configuration."

"One thing that would help it tighter integration with DCRUM. It's somewhat difficult to drill down and see everything, but I think that's in the future versions. We just haven't seen that yet."

"Dashboards are too clumsy, so it is good to keep less on dashboards and be easier to find the sections."

More Dynatrace cons

"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."

"There is a part of the rules for monitoring alerts. I want to understand more about how to choose the samples and the requirements for the rules. That is the part that I want to understand better and get better training for."

"The ITA, the post-incident analytics, could be improved."

"They have the Webslinger solution where you can see when something is alerting. It's a little bit cumbersome."

"ITRS have started to make some major changes that we haven't taken on board yet, in the creation of dashboards and more visibility of the metrics that we collect. At the moment, that's something that's lacking, but I know they have addressed it. Still, it’s not that easy to create stuff to help with visibility and dashboarding in Geneos."

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

"Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs."

"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The only limitation with scaling to cloud-native environments is licensing. It all depends on how many DEM units you're willing to license. The more of DEM units that you purchase, the more user data you can collect."

"As compared to New Relic and other providers, it is more expensive, which is its biggest disadvantage. Its biggest advantage is its capability. It is more feature-rich."

"The pricing is a little high, but still cheaper than competitors because Dynatrace at least has pay-as-you-go. Others do not. However, the pricing is confusing. I wish it was more simplified when trying to price out moving to a yearly contract."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was a pretty straightforward process. We had no hiccups."

"I would like to see them improve on their licensing and the cost. It's been a challenge for us because the way they have it broken out right now, you have to buy it by units. It's hard for us to know where to put those units because our company is broken up into all these different business units, so it's been challenging in that sense. I just would like to see them improve that model a little bit."

"There is a license issue where if we increase the memory we have to up the licenses. I was unaware of that going in. I thought it was scalable without all the paperwork behind the scenes. "

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace is excellent."

"The licensing model is confusing in solutioning clients for the number of hosts needed to deploy."

More Dynatrace pricing and cost advice

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	76
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	290

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

The key is to have a holistic view over the complete infrastructure, the ones you have listed are great for APM if you need to monitor applications end to end. I have tested them all and have not f...

See all answers

What cloud monitoring software did you choose and why?

While the environment does matter in the selection of an APM tool, I prefer to use Dynatrace to manage the entire stack. Both production and Dev/Test. I find it to be quite superior to anything els...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Dynatrace

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Dynatrace

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Dynatrace

Compared 2% of the time

More Dynatrace Competitors

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 12% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 6% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace

November 2025

Download Dynatrace product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

October 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

No data available

Geneos

Overview

Dynatrace is an AI-powered software intelligence monitoring platform that accelerates digital transformation and simplifies cloud complexities. Dynatrace is an entirely automated full-stack solution that provides data and answers about the performance of your applications and deep insight into every transaction throughout every application, including the end-user experience. By modernizing and automating enterprise cloud operations, users can deliver an optimal digital experience with higher quality software to customers faster.

Dynatrace offers an all-in-one automated artificial intelligence solution that brings together application performance, cloud and infrastructure, and digital experience monitoring. Dynatrace accelerates performance-driven results through operations, development, and business teams with a shared metrics platform. In addition, users are provided a full-stack monitoring experience with three patented technologies:

Smartscape - visualization mechanism that maps the totality of everything working in your environment and detects any casual dependencies between your applications, processes, websites, services, hosts, cloud infrastructure, and networks.
OneAgent - a technology that analyzes, gathers ,and unifies all business performance metrics throughout every layer of your technology stack.
PurePath Technology - code-level context and timings are captured from the mainframe to the cloud for all end-to-end transactions.

What does Dynatrace offer?

Dynatrace redefines how organizations monitor their digital ecosystems. The solution offers:

Cloud Automation: With AI engine Davis®, users can see the exact reason for problems and facilitate quick auto-remediation and intelligent cloud orchestration.
Application Security: With automated application vulnerability management, users can deliver applications faster and more securely.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Convenient broad visibility across your environments is provided with streamlined, automated infrastructure monitoring.
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM): Optimize your applications, provide better support, and improve user experience with a combination of Real User Monitoring (RUM), Session Replay, and synthetic monitoring throughout your environment.
Applications and Microservices: For complex cloud environments, Dynatrace can automatically provide visibility and root-cause answers. It can also monitor microservices.
Digital Business Analytics: Get AI-powered, real-time answers to analytical business queries with KPIs and metrics that are already flowing through applications.

Reviews from Real Users

Dynatrace is the only solution that provides answers to organizations based on deep insight into each user, transaction, and organization's environment.

Barry P., a managing performance engineer at Medica Health Plans, writes, "With Dynatrace, we have synthetic checks and real-user monitoring of all of our websites, places where members and providers can interact with us over the web. We monitor the response times of those with Dynatrace, and it's all integrated into one place."

A consultant at a tech service company notes, "A feature that's one of the highlights of Dynatrace is the AI. The second most valuable feature is OneAgent. Between infrastructures, applications, operating systems, you can deploy with just a single agent and can practically install and forget about it."

Dynatrace

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

Audi, Best Buy, LinkedIn, CISCO, Intuit, KRONOS, Scottrade, Wells Fargo, ULTA Beauty, Lenovo, Swarovsk, Nike, Whirlpool, American Express

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos

November 2025

Free Report: Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,085 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.