Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 14, 2023
 

Categories and Ranking

Figma
Ranking in Visual Collaboration Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Miro
Ranking in Visual Collaboration Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the Visual Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Figma is 40.9%, up from 32.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Miro is 32.9%, up from 27.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Visual Collaboration Platforms
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Shailin Patel - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 22, 2022
Project sharing solution used to visually present ideas for different features and makes it possible to create templates
There are two primary use cases. It is used to be able to visually present ideas for different features with our existing templates that we already have created inside of Figma. We also use it to create clinical prototypes for user testing The way you can create templates is probably most helpful…
Juraj Hajkovsky - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 3, 2024
Given its efficiency in managing large projects, I did not hesitate to purchase the license
I would like to see enhancements in Miro, especially when working with tables like Excel. Adding more copying, pasting, and formatting functions within tables would be helpful. Additionally, I wish for better picture editing capabilities, such as cropping and changing colours. So far, I haven't encountered any significant limitations while using Miro. Miro can be slow with other online meeting tools like Zoom or Microsoft Teams. Also, other platforms like Microsoft Teams might be more suitable for managing many files and ensuring team access. Miro could improve for complex tasks like dynamic object connections, but these are minor cons compared to its benefits.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"File sharing is easy."
"The way you can create templates is probably most helpful because it gives us a way to very quickly play around and test ideas and different types of layouts."
"As a consultant managing multiple projects, I find Miro's collaboration features highly beneficial."
"Online Collaboration made it easy to brainstorm."
"It is a versatile tool suitable for various tasks, including process modeling."
"Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful."
"Miro significantly enhances brainstorming sessions."
"The solution's UI is very user-friendly, and it is not that hard to define the shapes you are looking for or to import them."
"The product's initial setup phase is simple and straightforward."
 

Cons

"One of the areas for improvement is the onboarding experience. When you first starting using Figma, it can be a little confusing. It would be useful to have some guidance and direction."
"Sometimes the prototype view menu gets in the way of navigation, especially if the prototype has a menu at the top, and most of the time it does."
"It should have a desktop version."
"Maybe at some point, Miro should be able to use AI to provide analysis from the brainstorming sessions or files fed into it."
"The solution could be available on mobile."
"When I imported an image to Miro, my friend saw it differently from what I saw when I changed the size of it."
"I don't see the need to have updates in the product every other month or every other day."
"The product subscription is very expensive. The pricing could be better."
"I would like to see enhancements in Miro, especially when working with tables like Excel."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product costs approximately $300 per user."
"The product's price is low. Monthly and yearly subscriptions are available when it comes to the licensing part of the product."
"The initial cost of Miro was a bit high for me as a small company. However, considering its many benefits and the number of projects I have, it's reasonable and worth the investment."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Visual Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Miro or Figma?
Windows Server integrates well with all Microsoft and many other mainstream solutions. Building a Failover Cluster is comparatively much easier in Windows Server than with other solutions. We reall...
What do you like most about Figma?
The way you can create templates is probably most helpful because it gives us a way to very quickly play around and test ideas and different types of layouts.
What needs improvement with Figma?
One of the areas for improvement is the onboarding experience. When you first starting using Figma, it can be a little confusing. It would be useful to have some guidance and direction.
What do you like most about Miro?
Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful.
What needs improvement with Miro?
When I imported an image to Miro, my friend saw it differently from what I saw when I changed the size of it. I think the tool has some small technical issues that need to be improved.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Uber, Zoom, Deliveroo
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Figma vs. Miro and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.