We performed a comparison between Figma and Miro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Lucid Software, Figma, Miro and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms."File sharing is easy."
"The way you can create templates is probably most helpful because it gives us a way to very quickly play around and test ideas and different types of layouts."
"Online Collaboration made it easy to brainstorm."
"Integrations with so many other tools make this platform highly useful."
"Sometimes the prototype view menu gets in the way of navigation, especially if the prototype has a menu at the top, and most of the time it does."
"One of the areas for improvement is the onboarding experience. When you first starting using Figma, it can be a little confusing. It would be useful to have some guidance and direction."
"Maybe at some point, Miro should be able to use AI to provide analysis from the brainstorming sessions or files fed into it."
"It should have a desktop version."
Figma is ranked 3rd in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews while Miro is ranked 4th in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews. Figma is rated 10.0, while Miro is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Figma writes "Reliable, easy to share files, and has a simple initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Miro writes "Easy integrations, in-built templates, and lots of training videos". Figma is most compared with MURAL, Lucidchart, Lucidspark and Jamboard, whereas Miro is most compared with Lucidchart, Lucidspark, Jamboard, iObeya and MURAL.
See our list of best Visual Collaboration Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Visual Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
