Flowmon vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Progress Software and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Progress Software is ranked #39 with an average rating of 9.0, while ITRS is ranked #63 with an average rating of 6.5. Progress Software holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

Flowmon

Read 4 Flowmon reviews

900 Views
706 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

1,134 Views
654 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Flowmon

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Flowmon compete in the network monitoring and analytics category. Flowmon is seen to have the upper hand due to its advanced feature offerings, whereas ITRS Geneos is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: ITRS Geneos is valued for real-time data processing, extensive plugin options, and its ability to offer tailored network monitoring experiences. Flowmon is highlighted for advanced security analytics, comprehensive network visibility, and its focus on security-centric environments.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos could improve in expanding its security feature set, refining user interface simplicity, and enhancing integration capabilities. Flowmon might focus on improving customer support accessibility, offering more flexible pricing, and extending customization options for security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos provides a flexible deployment model aligning with existing infrastructures and responsive customer support aiding faster onboarding. Flowmon is praised for its straightforward deployment with minimal disruptions though reaching customer service can be a challenge.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is known for competitive pricing with scalable licensing options that offer a favorable ROI for varied business sizes. Flowmon comes with a higher setup cost justified by enhanced feature sets and robust ROI for security investments.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowmon vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowmon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

39th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (15th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (35th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (42nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Flowmon is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Quick identification of network issues enhances performance monitoring

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly. We need this solution to monitor the network performance. We started using it three…

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."

"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."

"Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly."

"The solution is stable."

"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."

"The ability to logically normalize data gathered from multiple types of sources via pre-built plugins is extremely powerful. This functionality, coupled with the ability to import custom data via the Toolkit plugin allows Geneos to be leveraged to monitor every system in the enterprise."

"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"

"Custom script toolkits"

"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

"It's a very powerful application monitoring tool across the industry. Many free, open-source tools are available. There are also paid tools, but ITRS Geneos is a real-time application monitoring tool where the user can monitor, self-configure, and manage alerts through their console."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."

"The licensing price could be better."

"I do not know the detailed pricing."

"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."

"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"Much of the reporting outside of the user interface is very basic and requires much customization to be useful."

"ITRS Geneos cloud monitoring is very weak and can use improvement."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS. We have to send reporting to management every day. To do that we have to check the dashboard and then we have to report whether everything is fine or not. In the future, I want something, some reporting kind of feature in ITRS, where it can collect all the data and mention what is green, what is amber, what is red in a report."

"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."

"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be better."

"It works with a permanent license, and then you can pay for the support. For the gold support, you need to pay yearly."

"The licensing fee accrues only once, but that of support is annual."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

76%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I don't understand the price. I am in deployment, so I do not know the detailed pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Flowmon

Compared 20% of the time

Vectra AI vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Flowmon

Compared 7% of the time

More Flowmon Competitors

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Flowmon product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

May 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

Flowmon Anomaly Detection System

Geneos

Overview

Flowmon is a professional tool for effective network troubleshooting, performance monitoring, capacity planning, encrypted traffic analysis and cloud monitoring. Instead of just the red/green infrastructure status, it helps NetOps teams to understand user experience while keeping the amount of data noise and analytical work to a minimum. Flowmon is a part of the Kemp product portfolio.

Progress Software

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

SEGA

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Free Report: Flowmon vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowmon vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowmon vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.