We performed a comparison between ITRS Geneos and ServiceNow IT Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."
"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."
"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."
"Geneos automatically sends email notifications when any batch job fails, the database is down or the website is down. It is automatically monitoring everything and reduces manual effort."
"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."
"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"
"I always appreciate Geneos's stability and ease of use."
"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."
"It helps streamline management and processes."
"It is a product that is familiar for a lot of users."
"The scalability of ServiceNow is good."
"Provides everything in one solution."
"I am impressed with the tool's ability to track information in an easy way."
"The solution allows you to subscribe to the features you need and utilize CMDB, ITSM, and discovery on the same platform."
"It is a market leader and is very implementation-friendly. Developers have a clear understanding of how the solution works, and it is mature enough to handle different client needs."
"It is easy to use and simple to learn."
"Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs."
"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app. This is something that probably everyone asks when they see the tool and they see how powerful it is. If there is any mobile app for this or if there is any way this tool can be more easily accessible other than having a big client installed, it would be great. I know you can build dashboards, et cetera, but there is no quick and easy way. I should be able to download an app, log in, and see my status. That will put this product above everything else out there. I believe it's on their roadmap."
"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."
"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."
"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."
"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."
"I would really like to see something from the Geneos side to set up automated reporting from ITRS. We have to send reporting to management every day. To do that we have to check the dashboard and then we have to report whether everything is fine or not. In the future, I want something, some reporting kind of feature in ITRS, where it can collect all the data and mention what is green, what is amber, what is red in a report."
"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."
"The pricing is high."
"Even though they call it low code there are a lot of customizations needed, especially from an ITOM standpoint."
"It should have better integrations with other solutions."
"At times, it got cumbersome from the project management perspective. It could have been because of the way we were using it. I found Microsoft Project to be more extensive and robust than ITOM."
"The solution's licensing model is a bit complicated. It should be simple and easy for people to understand."
"Lacks the ability to do its own monitoring."
"If you are new to using the solution, you will find the setup complex."
"Service Mapping is a time-consuming process. The time and effort versus the benefits are very difficult to articulate to customers."
More ServiceNow IT Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ITRS Geneos is ranked 15th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 57 reviews while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is ranked 8th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 34 reviews. ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow IT Operations Management writes "A very capable solution that includes a valuable, user-friendly workflow management tool". ITRS Geneos is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Grafana, Datadog and BigPanda, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management is most compared with OpsRamp, Moogsoft, Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence), Datadog and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our ITRS Geneos vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.