CA Unified Communications Monitor vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Broadcom and ITRS are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #103, while ITRS is ranked #63 with an average rating of 6.5. Broadcom holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to ITRS’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

185 Views
133 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

1,134 Views
654 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and ITRS Geneos are competing products in the network monitoring and performance management category. ITRS Geneos appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and adaptability, which many users believe justify its higher cost.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides in-depth analysis of unified communication environments, offers real-time visibility, and includes diagnostics capabilities. ITRS Geneos offers advanced monitoring features across various infrastructure types, extensive customization options, and highly detailed data monitoring.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could benefit from enhanced compatibility with more third-party applications, increased scalability for larger organizations, and improved reporting features. ITRS Geneos could focus on simplifying its installation process, offering more intuitive user interfaces, and reducing the complexity of its integration with existing systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor is generally easier to deploy, with straightforward setup processes and good customer service support. ITRS Geneos, while initially more complex to install, provides robust functionality and dedicated technical support that helps mitigate deployment challenges.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers competitive pricing with a good ROI due to its lower upfront cost, appealing to small to mid-sized businesses. ITRS Geneos, with a higher setup cost, provides substantial long-term ROI through its adaptability and comprehensive features, attracting larger enterprises seeking a feature-rich monitoring solution.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

103rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

72nd

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

42nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"Tons of default modules which are available out of the box"

"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."

"This tool allows one to analyse, integrate and customize as per the systems and allows you to set your own rules."

"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."

"In my experience, being able to monitor our databases is a valuable feature as we can create our own queries and aren't reliant on the in-built ones."

"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."

"I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option."

"One of the best aspects of Geneos is that it has a broad scope and can cover a lot of use cases. You can write your own scripts to monitor really specific things. And the rules that you can put in place can be quite complex for the alerts."

More ITRS Geneos pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"At the moment Geneos is excellent and handling real time monitoring, however not great at doing historical reporting."

"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."

"One thing that could be improved in terms of rapid scaling would be more ability to clone aspects of an implementation. It seems like there are opportunities in this area, where we have repetitive tasks to do when it comes to implementing things on new servers or on new gateways. It would be great if there was an easy way to clone something that had already been done."

"I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself."

"For the last year or two, I've been asking the vendor about the mobile app. This is something that probably everyone asks when they see the tool and they see how powerful it is. If there is any mobile app for this or if there is any way this tool can be more easily accessible other than having a big client installed, it would be great. I know you can build dashboards, et cetera, but there is no quick and easy way. I should be able to download an app, log in, and see my status. That will put this product above everything else out there. I believe it's on their roadmap."

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

More ITRS Geneos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

76%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about ITRS Geneos?

I would say that it is an easy-to-use monitoring tool. Amongst the available monitoring tools, it is a really good option.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

April 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

Geneos

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

April 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ITRS Geneos report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.