Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk AppDynamics Logo

Top 10 Splunk AppDynamics Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk AppDynamics based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, Datadog, and Dynatrace. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk AppDynamics surpasses its competitors by offering advanced real-time analytics, comprehensive infrastructure monitoring, and seamless integration capabilities, ensuring enhanced performance optimization and delivering unparalleled insights into application performance and user experience.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics delivers comprehensive monitoring with deep diagnostics and transaction insights, ideal for detailed application analysis. In comparison, Zabbix emphasizes open-source adaptability and customizable templates, appealing to users seeking cost-effective solutions with flexible technical capabilities.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zabbix Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a more flexible setup cost compared to Zabbix's straightforward one-time setup fee, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a more flexible setup cost compared to Zabbix's straightforward one-time setup fee, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed application insights that aid in diagnosing issues, appealing to those needing in-depth monitoring. In comparison, Datadog excels in infrastructure monitoring with broad integrations, attracting buyers seeking a unified system health view.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, offering a more tailored solution for complex environments while Datadog provides a cost-effective setup with straightforward scalability suitable for smaller organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, offering a more tailored solution for complex environments while Datadog provides a cost-effective setup with straightforward scalability suitable for smaller organizations.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace excels with automated deployment and AI-driven problem-solving, appealing to tech buyers seeking streamlined management. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers robust application mapping and transaction insights, attracting those needing comprehensive feature sets despite higher costs.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Dynatrace offers a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while Splunk AppDynamics tends to have a higher initial setup cost. The difference in setup costs can significantly affect the overall pricing decision for enterprises considering these tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace offers a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while Splunk AppDynamics tends to have a higher initial setup cost. The difference in setup costs can significantly affect the overall pricing decision for enterprises considering these tools.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers superior visibility in Java and .NET environments with strong transaction diagnostics. In comparison, New Relic excels with user-friendly dashboards providing real-time metrics. Splunk AppDynamics suits those needing detailed transaction monitoring, while New Relic appeals to those prioritizing intuitive interfaces.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a complex and costly setup process, while New Relic offers a simpler and more affordable setup experience.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a complex and costly setup process, while New Relic offers a simpler and more affordable setup experience.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides in-depth application performance monitoring with features like stack tracing and alerts. In comparison, Cribl excels in data transformation and routing, offering cost-effective solutions for large data volumes. Splunk AppDynamics is suitable for enterprises, while Cribl caters to data management needs.
Download Cribl vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost due to its extensive features, while Cribl offers a more affordable and straightforward setup. This pricing distinction highlights Cribl's appeal for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost due to its extensive features, while Cribl offers a more affordable and straightforward setup. This pricing distinction highlights Cribl's appeal for budget-conscious users.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides deep application insights ideal for Java and .NET environments. In comparison, Azure Monitor offers broad infrastructure coverage within the Azure ecosystem. A tech buyer may choose AppDynamics for detailed analysis or Azure Monitor for integrated Azure cloud solutions.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Azure Monitor provides a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting differences in ease and cost of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Azure Monitor provides a more complex setup with potentially higher initial expenses, highlighting differences in ease and cost of implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in detailed application performance tracking, suitable for those needing comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Grafana offers flexibility in visualization and integration, ideal for tech buyers seeking an open-source solution with strong customization and data integration capabilities.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Grafana, emphasizing a significant difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Grafana, emphasizing a significant difference in initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers deep application monitoring, ideal for complex environments with comprehensive transaction tracking and JVM monitoring. In comparison, Sentry emphasizes application error management and integration capabilities, focusing on end-user experience and efficient error handling with platforms like AWS Lambda and GitLab.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Sentry offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Differences in setup expenses make Splunk AppDynamics a pricier option compared to the cost-effective approach of Sentry.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a substantial setup cost, whereas Sentry offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. Differences in setup expenses make Splunk AppDynamics a pricier option compared to the cost-effective approach of Sentry.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in transaction metrics and stack trace analysis, appealing to those seeking in-depth performance insights. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers competitive pricing and superior search capabilities, attracting buyers desiring efficient on-premises deployment and cost-effective performance monitoring.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which offers more budget-friendly options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, which offers more budget-friendly options.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides deep application insights, enhancing performance monitoring with features like JVM memory tracking. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor focuses on infrastructure monitoring with proactive alerting. Splunk AppDynamics suits complex applications, while PRTG is ideal for budget-conscious infrastructure monitoring.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost with extensive feature offerings, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup, making it suitable for smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost with extensive feature offerings, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup, making it suitable for smaller budgets.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in detailed metrics and transaction tracking for performance insights. In comparison, Palantir Foundry offers comprehensive data integration and visualization, appealing for large-scale data management. Both present a strategic choice depending on organization size and specific data demands.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup process, reducing initial costs, while Palantir Foundry requires a higher initial investment due to its complex integration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup process, reducing initial costs, while Palantir Foundry requires a higher initial investment due to its complex integration needs.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI excels in network services monitoring with customization via plugins and supports IT markets seeking simplicity and configurability. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive transaction monitoring and performance analytics, appealing to enterprises requiring extensive insights in Java and .NET environments.
Download Nagios XI vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Nagios XI offers a more cost-effective setup, while Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI offers a more cost-effective setup, while Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced features.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.8 out of 5
AppDynamics excels in transaction tracking and monitoring, ideal for Java environments needing detailed application insights. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service offers cost-effective data management and robust search capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing large dataset handling and flexible data retrieval over in-depth performance analysis.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, offering robust features, while Amazon OpenSearch Service presents a cost-effective option with more basic features.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, offering robust features, while Amazon OpenSearch Service presents a cost-effective option with more basic features.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance with detailed data analysis and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Checkmk offers superior infrastructure monitoring with easy network integration. Splunk AppDynamics faces licensing challenges, whereas Checkmk requires better third-party integration and improved onboarding resources.
Download Checkmk vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics often involves higher setup costs compared to Checkmk, making Checkmk a more budget-friendly alternative for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics often involves higher setup costs compared to Checkmk, making Checkmk a more budget-friendly alternative for initial deployment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers in-depth code-level visibility and transaction tracking, appealing to those needing comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, LogicMonitor attracts users with customizable dashboards and robust data visualization, ideal for efficient network monitoring. Both excel in deployment flexibility and customer service.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a high initial setup cost, while LogicMonitor offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a high initial setup cost, while LogicMonitor offers a more cost-effective setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive application tracking and analytics, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, AWS X-Ray focuses on tracing distributed systems, making it suitable for serverless architectures. Each caters differently to integration, customization needs, deployment environments, and budget considerations.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics generally has high setup costs, while AWS X-Ray typically offers a more cost-efficient setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics generally has high setup costs, while AWS X-Ray typically offers a more cost-efficient setup option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels with in-depth application-level insights, offering comprehensive transaction tracing and performance monitoring. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides extensive IT infrastructure visibility with features like discovery and service mapping. Splunk AppDynamics suits app-focused needs, while ServiceNow addresses broader IT management challenges.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a high setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers a more cost-effective setup. Businesses seeking quick deployment might prefer ServiceNow for its lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a high setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers a more cost-effective setup. Businesses seeking quick deployment might prefer ServiceNow for its lower initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels in multi-tenancy with customization and integration, offering granular monitoring solutions. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides real-time transaction monitoring and analytics. ScienceLogic's device-based pricing offers flexibility, while Splunk AppDynamics focuses on application performance with varied licensing models.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ScienceLogic offers straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Splunk AppDynamics involves higher initial setup fees but provides a robust feature set tailored for complex environments.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic offers straightforward setup with competitive costs, while Splunk AppDynamics involves higher initial setup fees but provides a robust feature set tailored for complex environments.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers extensive monitoring and detailed transaction tracking appealing to businesses prioritizing comprehensive visibility. In comparison, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline enhances network data flow insights, making it ideal for tech buyers focusing on network performance and streamlined encryption processes.
Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a flexible setup cost, while Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline typically requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a flexible setup cost, while Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline typically requires a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold attracts tech buyers with its competitive pricing, quick deployment, and strong customer support, ideal for network monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced application performance management and extensive insights, appealing to those needing detailed analytics despite a higher initial cost.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold offers a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice, while Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced capabilities that may justify its higher setup expenses for those needing extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold offers a lower setup cost, making it an economical choice, while Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced capabilities that may justify its higher setup expenses for those needing extensive features.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels with features like transaction tracking, JVM monitoring, and business analytics, ideal for detailed application performance. In comparison, OpsRamp focuses on infrastructure orchestration and AIOps, suitable for simpler interfaces and integrated infrastructure management.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, while OpsRamp provides a more budget-friendly initial setup. Focusing on cost differences reveals OpsRamp as a more cost-effective option when considering setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, while OpsRamp provides a more budget-friendly initial setup. Focusing on cost differences reveals OpsRamp as a more cost-effective option when considering setup expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in code issue detection with deep stack trace capabilities, ideal for Java applications. In comparison, SolarWinds stands out in comprehensive network and server monitoring. Splunk offers premium performance tracking, while SolarWinds provides cost-effective infrastructure visibility. Each caters to specific monitoring needs.
Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers a more affordable and straightforward implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers a more affordable and straightforward implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive JVM performance insights with extensive transaction tracing and business monitoring. In comparison, Coralogix focuses on log analysis and cloud integration, appealing to users who prioritize log analytics. Splunk AppDynamics suits complex needs, while Coralogix offers budget-friendly log management.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs compared to Coralogix, highlighting the affordability of Coralogix for budget-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs compared to Coralogix, highlighting the affordability of Coralogix for budget-conscious businesses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in extensive monitoring across various environments, offering flexibility in deployment. In comparison, ITRS Geneos suits financial industry needs with customized views and real-time monitoring, providing proactive management. Both solutions uphold strong customer service, addressing specific deployment preferences.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost compared to ITRS Geneos, which offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides extensive application-level insights with detailed tracking and analysis across multiple nodes, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers robust monitoring with operational dashboards and real-time data, particularly suited for hybrid cloud performance optimization.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which offers a more cost-effective entry point for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which offers a more cost-effective entry point for users.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in tracking complex applications with insights and predictive analytics. In comparison, IBM SevOne NPM offers robust network management with real-time monitoring. A tech buyer might choose AppDynamics for application insights or SevOne for scalable network management solutions.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a notable setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne NPM typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a notable setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne NPM typically offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed insights and monitoring for complex applications, addressing diverse needs. In comparison, Cisco Intersight provides comprehensive cloud integration and robust infrastructure management, appealing to organizations focused on hybrid environments and less detailed application monitoring.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a moderate setup cost, while Cisco Intersight offers a lower initial expense, highlighting a notable budget-friendly advantage for the latter.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a moderate setup cost, while Cisco Intersight offers a lower initial expense, highlighting a notable budget-friendly advantage for the latter.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight attracts tech buyers with integrated platforms and holistic monitoring for diverse assets. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive application performance features and detailed transaction tracking. Each solution suits distinct requirements, from infrastructure diversity to precise application insights.
Download BMC TrueSight vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
BMC TrueSight typically involves higher setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics has a more straightforward setup with lower initial expenses. TrueSight's advanced features may justify the cost difference compared to the cost-effective initial setup of Splunk AppDynamics.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight typically involves higher setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics has a more straightforward setup with lower initial expenses. TrueSight's advanced features may justify the cost difference compared to the cost-effective initial setup of Splunk AppDynamics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics attracts buyers with strong application performance monitoring and flexible support. In comparison, Honeycomb Enterprise, with advanced event-driven capabilities, appeals to those needing deep data insights and streamlined deployment, making it a compelling option for innovative operational efficiency.
Download Honeycomb Enterprise vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics features higher setup costs compared to Honeycomb Enterprise, which offers a more affordable and streamlined onboarding process. This noticeable pricing difference could be a crucial factor for organizations considering initial implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics features higher setup costs compared to Honeycomb Enterprise, which offers a more affordable and streamlined onboarding process. This noticeable pricing difference could be a crucial factor for organizations considering initial implementation expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive support and streamlined deployment, appealing to organizations needing integrated solutions and faster onboarding. In comparison, OpenTelemetry's open-source framework and flexibility make it ideal for tech buyers seeking customizable observability and cost-effective scalability with technical expertise.
Splunk AppDynamics entails a substantial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry presents a more cost-effective alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics entails a substantial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry presents a more cost-effective alternative.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in deep diagnostic capabilities, making it ideal for detailed transaction monitoring. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite offers cost-effectiveness with seamless public cloud operations, appealing to businesses seeking lower entry costs and operational savings.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud's operations suite. This makes Google Cloud's operations suite a more cost-effective choice when evaluating pricing and initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a significantly higher setup cost compared to Google Cloud's operations suite. This makes Google Cloud's operations suite a more cost-effective choice when evaluating pricing and initial setup expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive application insights and transaction tracking, ideal for detailed performance monitoring across environments. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on network-level monitoring for efficient connectivity and issue resolution, attracting tech buyers seeking network management capabilities.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance provides a more complex and variable pricing structure. These differences highlight the contrast in initial setup expense between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup cost, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance provides a more complex and variable pricing structure. These differences highlight the contrast in initial setup expense between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring with features like auto-baseline applications and dynamic maps. In comparison, LiveNX focuses on real-time network monitoring and visual analytics, emphasizing network topology and troubleshooting, catering to different technical needs and integration preferences.
Download LiveNX vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically has a more complex setup process compared to LiveNX, which offers a more straightforward implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically has a more complex setup process compared to LiveNX, which offers a more straightforward implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive monitoring with transaction tracking and performance insights, ideal for detailed diagnostics. In comparison, BigPanda excels in alert deduplication and correlation, enhancing incident management efficiency. Splunk may seem costly, while BigPanda provides competitive pricing with effective issue resolution.
Download BigPanda vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves substantial initial setup costs, contrasted with more economical setup expenses of BigPanda. While Splunk AppDynamics demands a higher initial investment, BigPanda offers a cost-effective alternative with more budget-friendly setup processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves substantial initial setup costs, contrasted with more economical setup expenses of BigPanda. While Splunk AppDynamics demands a higher initial investment, BigPanda offers a cost-effective alternative with more budget-friendly setup processes.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud attracts budget-conscious buyers with its cost-effective infrastructure monitoring and customer support. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics appeals to those seeking advanced application performance monitoring and AI-driven insights, justifying its higher price for organizations prioritizing detailed analytics and superior functionality.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud offers a flexible setup cost, appealing to those seeking budget-friendly options, while Splunk AppDynamics typically involves a higher initial investment, highlighting its emphasis on comprehensive features and advanced analytics.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud offers a flexible setup cost, appealing to those seeking budget-friendly options, while Splunk AppDynamics typically involves a higher initial investment, highlighting its emphasis on comprehensive features and advanced analytics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Instana Dynamic APM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in deep-dive diagnostics and transaction tracking for comprehensive performance insights. In comparison, Instana Dynamic APM offers granular real-time data collection and automatic instrumentation, appealing for its quick deployment and budget-friendly pricing for simpler monitoring needs.
Download Instana Dynamic APM vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a relatively high initial setup cost, while Instana Dynamic APM offers more manageable setup expenses. Users often consider these cost differences when evaluating their APM solution options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a relatively high initial setup cost, while Instana Dynamic APM offers more manageable setup expenses. Users often consider these cost differences when evaluating their APM solution options.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers application insights with features like transaction tracing and JVM metrics, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Catchpoint excels in global web performance monitoring with robust notifications, making it suitable for enterprises focused on internet performance and synthetic testing.
Download Catchpoint vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant setup cost, while Catchpoint offers a more budget-friendly installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant setup cost, while Catchpoint offers a more budget-friendly installation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise offers comprehensive observability and ease of setup, benefiting IT management in complex environments. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics emphasizes real-time transaction monitoring and diagnostics, ideal for developers focusing on performance insights in Java and .NET environments.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise offers a more cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher initial cost.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive application performance insights, ideal for detailed transaction analysis. In comparison, Moogsoft is valued for its noise reduction and real-time event correlation, streamlining IT environments effectively. Splunk AppDynamics excels in diagnostics, while Moogsoft focuses on operational efficiency.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs than Moogsoft, making it a pricier choice for initial implementation. Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup, attracting those conscious of upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs than Moogsoft, making it a pricier choice for initial implementation. Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly setup, attracting those conscious of upfront expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
AppDynamics provides detailed insights into application performance, making it ideal for monitoring Java and .NET environments. In comparison, vRealize Network Insight enhances network flow visualization, ideal for managing complex network infrastructures. Both solutions offer unique capabilities that cater to different technical needs.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to vRealize Network Insight's more affordable setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to vRealize Network Insight's more affordable setup fees.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management
4.0 out of 5
Broadcom DX APM focuses on detailed transaction monitoring and customizable instrumentation for Java and .NET, making it suitable for deep integration needs. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers end-to-end user transaction tracing, suitable for visualizing bottlenecks and effective database monitoring.
Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Splunk AppDynamics offers more premium features that contribute to a higher initial investment compared to Broadcom.
View comparison
Pricing
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Splunk AppDynamics offers more premium features that contribute to a higher initial investment compared to Broadcom.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Alluvio Aternity excels in desktop and endpoint monitoring, offering comprehensive hardware performance visibility. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics focuses on application performance and business transaction monitoring, making it suitable for complex environments. Both solutions address distinct monitoring needs, providing tailored insights to improve operational efficiency.
Download Alluvio Aternity vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio Aternity offers a simpler setup cost structure, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio Aternity offers a simpler setup cost structure, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced data analytics and real-time monitoring, appealing to those needing deep insights. In comparison, FortiMonitor offers essential network performance monitoring with lower setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious users seeking core monitoring functionalities. Splunk AppDynamics delivers superior analytics at a higher price.
Download FortiMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to FortiMonitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a significant disparity in their pricing approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to FortiMonitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a significant disparity in their pricing approach.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance with in-depth monitoring and dynamic mapping for developers. In comparison, OmniPeek focuses on network performance, offering real-time traffic analysis for administrators. A tech buyer values AppDynamics for application insights and OmniPeek for effective network monitoring.
Download OmniPeek vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive feature set, while OmniPeek offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive feature set, while OmniPeek offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio AppResponse
4.3 out of 5
Alluvio AppResponse appeals with its cost-effective price and network data insights. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers extensive application monitoring with advanced analytics. Alluvio is easy to deploy, while Splunk AppDynamics provides deeper features suitable for comprehensive performance monitoring despite higher costs.
Download Alluvio AppResponse vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio AppResponse involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, offering a more extensive feature integration upfront. Splunk AppDynamics provides a cost-effective entry point with scalable options as needs evolve.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio AppResponse involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, offering a more extensive feature integration upfront. Splunk AppDynamics provides a cost-effective entry point with scalable options as needs evolve.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Applications Manager is favored for its affordable pricing and straightforward support. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics, though more expensive, offers comprehensive features and advanced analytics, making it appealing for its high return on investment. ManageEngine attracts cost-conscious buyers, while Splunk AppDynamics suits those seeking robust capabilities.
Download ManageEngine Applications Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a competitive setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics tends to be higher in comparison. Each solution provides unique features, impacting the initial investment required for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a competitive setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics tends to be higher in comparison. Each solution provides unique features, impacting the initial investment required for deployment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apache SkyWalking
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics is ideal for enterprises needing detailed insights through real-time monitoring and analytics. In comparison, Apache SkyWalking's open-source flexibility and low-cost setup make it suitable for businesses seeking scalable solutions with community-driven support.
Splunk AppDynamics requires higher setup costs, whereas Apache SkyWalking offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires higher setup costs, whereas Apache SkyWalking offers a more budget-friendly setup.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
IT Operations Analytics