Spiceworks and Splunk AppDynamics compete in the domain of IT management and application performance monitoring tools. Splunk AppDynamics generally holds an advantage due to its comprehensive analytics and diagnostics capabilities, despite its higher cost.
Features: Spiceworks is a free tool effective for SMBs, providing an easy setup for help desk and inventory management, supported by a strong community network. Splunk AppDynamics offers robust application performance monitoring with detailed analytics, deep diagnostics, and business transaction tracking, making it particularly powerful for enterprises.
Room for Improvement: Spiceworks needs to enhance scalability to handle environments beyond 2,000 endpoints and improve its network mapping and reporting features. Splunk AppDynamics should focus on simplifying its monitoring tools and user interface, addressing the complexity of setup, and reconsidering its licensing and pricing models to better align with market standards.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spiceworks is primarily on-premises with strong community support but lacks direct phone support, limiting real-time assistance. Splunk AppDynamics offers flexible deployment across various cloud environments and provides professional support services, appealing to larger enterprises that require more direct and reliable customer support.
Pricing and ROI: Spiceworks offers a compelling ROI by being completely free, making it attractive for budget-conscious SMBs despite scalability limitations. Splunk AppDynamics, while higher priced, offsets its cost with extensive features and professional support aimed at enterprises that prioritize comprehensive monitoring solutions over cost.
According to errors, exceptions, and code-level details related to their application performance on a daily basis, the application development team tries to help with Splunk AppDynamics to reduce errors and exceptions, which helps the end users get application availability and feel more confident.
To understand the magnitude of it, when the company asked to replace Splunk AppDynamics with another tool, I indicated that for the proposed tool, we would need five people to do the analysis that Splunk AppDynamics enables me to do.
It's very hard to find ROI because we are currently focused only on the on-premises applications.
AppDynamics is much more helpful.
We got a contact, an account manager, to work directly with for technical support.
They help us resolve any issues raised by our team relating to operations, application instrumentation, or any other issues.
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I would rate the scalability of Splunk AppDynamics as a nine out of ten.
I assess how Splunk AppDynamics scales with the growing needs of my organization as good, since we are growing and adding more servers.
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
There are no issues or bugs with the 20.4 version; it is very stable with no functionality or operational issues.
I can rate it nine out of ten.
Splunk AppDynamics does not support the complete MELT framework, which includes metrics, events, logging, and tracing for the entire stack.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
A good integration with Splunk would be very interesting, as Splunk is a good product for logs, and that part is currently missing in Splunk AppDynamics.
We completed a three-year deal for Splunk and for AppDynamics, which costs millions of dollars.
Customers have to pay a premium price, however, they receive considerable value from the product.
All these solutions at the moment are cheap, but it is like paying for insurance; you pay insurance to avoid major damage.
Additionally, it is free software.
We have multiple tools, but end users prefer to use Splunk AppDynamics because their portal navigation is very simple and clear.
The real user monitoring and digital experience monitoring effectively track actual user experience with the applications, including page loading, interaction time for both desktop and mobile applications.
The feature that I appreciate in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is the intuitive and user-friendly dynamic mapping it creates for workflows.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk AppDynamics | 2.8% |
| Spiceworks | 0.4% |
| Other | 96.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 55 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
| Large Enterprise | 188 |
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.
AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.
What are the key features of AppDynamics?In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
